Doug Barton wrote at 13:45 -0800 on Jan 12, 2008:
> I have actually advocated in the past that ALL ports should have version
> numbers, and that we then create virtual ports (symlinks, whatever) that
> point to whatever is the "current" version of that software. Different
> developers dislike that idea for different reasons, but my opinion is
> still that from the user perspective this would make life a lot easier.
I do this for a site-wide nfs shared installed apps dir at work
(ignoring the many edge cases, it's basically this: install to
PREFIX=/site/dist/${PKGNAME} and make sym links to /site/bin,
/site/lib). It's not particularly easy given the current ports
propensity to have everything in /usr/local, but I find it worthwhile.
It does make life easier (for both users and admins) for at least a
few reasons:
- multiple versions of the same port can co-exist (sometimes until a
newer one is proven to work)
- live upgrades don't affect people that may be running an older
version of a port since the old port is still around (and
just re-pointing a sym link to the new version doesn't make
an existing running instance of a program fail).
- updates are generally transparent to users
- having a common shared nfs dir means only having to install
a port once and all machines instantly get access.
I have my own hacks to the port tree to accomodate this strategy. And
no, I won't publish them as they are quite hacky in places, but if
there were moves in the direction you describe (not likely as far as I
can see due to resistance of the kind you described - and it's not a
particularly small task to support something like this officially), I
could chime in about how I've been doing it for the last 10 years.
Ports based on pkg-config have made this much easier, and for those
ports I almost don't have to do anything special at all except set
PREFIX to point somewhere other than /usr/local.
It's had some bumps in the road over the years, but it mostly just
works now.
I must say it's been much nicer now that the pointyhat checks for
ports that don't handle PREFIX properly. 10 years ago that was a much
more prevalent problem.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
