Robert Noland wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:01 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Ok chaps, I think I have it.
This involves no recursive calls of make. Furthermore the
dependencies
it creates are the real dependencies on your system, not what ports
thinks it should be, because it gets
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:01 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Ok chaps, I think I have it.
>
> This involves no recursive calls of make. Furthermore the
> dependencies
> it creates are the real dependencies on your system, not what ports
> thinks it should be, because it gets all the inf
Ok chaps, I think I have it.
This involves no recursive calls of make. Furthermore the dependencies
it creates are the real dependencies on your system, not what ports
thinks it should be, because it gets all the information from
/var/db/pkg. On my system it takes a second or two to register
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 07:59:11
-0500):
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue,
15 May 2007 16:53:35 -0500):
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting "Ulrich Spoerlein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 18:28:55
> +0200):
> > > The problem not discussed so far is: some ports may not have all first
> > > order dependencies. So anyone wanting to change this should install a
> > > tinderbox and start testin
Quoting "Ulrich Spoerlein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 18:28:55
+0200):
> > The problem not discussed so far is: some ports may not have all first
> > order dependencies. So anyone wanting to change this should install a
> > tinderbox and start testing fixing those ports.
>
> Hmmm, thi
On 5/16/07, Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting "J. Porter Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 16 May 2007
06:25:32 -0500):
> What I don't like about the flattening of the dependencies is
> that there seems to be information loss; that is, I can't figure
> out why one port (e
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 07:59:11
-0500):
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue,
> > 15 May 2007 16:53:35 -0500):
> >
> >> Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> >>> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >
>
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Basically I think we are stuck on making "make package-depends" go any
faster.
However I do think that the modifications I made to pkg_create go a
very
significant way to solv
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 23:59:23 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> You expect dependencies in LOCALBASE and install into PREFIX.
Shouldn't you install into ${DESTDIR}${PREFIX} or ${TARGETDIR} ?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
Tijl Coosemans píše v st 16. 05. 2007 v 15:44 +0200:
> On Tuesday 15 May 2007 23:59:23 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > You expect dependencies in LOCALBASE and install into PREFIX.
>
> Shouldn't you install into ${DESTDIR}${PREFIX} or ${TARGETDIR} ?
Hell no :)
That plan got scraped.
--
Pav Lucistnik
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
On 5/15/07, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> I also need to quickly look up origin -> pkgname and would suggest
> placing this in the INDEX file. Then you have the foundation in
place to
> be able to run 'make vim-7.1.2.tbz'
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue,
15 May 2007 16:53:35 -0500):
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
2. Sorting the dependencies in pkg_create. My fix now cuts this
out completely. Thus there is no need to chang
Quoting "J. Porter Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 16 May 2007
06:25:32 -0500):
What I don't like about the flattening of the dependencies is
that there seems to be information loss; that is, I can't figure
out why one port (e.g., gweled) requires another port (e.g.,
cdrtools). Is there
What I don't like about the flattening of the dependencies is
that there seems to be information loss; that is, I can't figure
out why one port (e.g., gweled) requires another port (e.g.,
cdrtools). Is there any tool to unflatten the dependencies?
--
J. Porter Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_
On 5/16/07, Matthew D. Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:13:41AM +0200 I heard the voice of
Ulrich Spoerlein, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> True, true. And as pointed out above, if you don't build the INDEX
> with your current pkg options, it is useless anyway.
Oh, worse.
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:13:41AM +0200 I heard the voice of
Ulrich Spoerlein, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> True, true. And as pointed out above, if you don't build the INDEX
> with your current pkg options, it is useless anyway.
Oh, worse. If you don't build INDEX with your current _installed
sy
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from
Tue, 15 May 2007 16:53:35 -0500):
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
2. Sorting the dependencies in pkg_create. My fix now cuts this
out completely. Thus there is no need to change the structure of
/var
Hi All
Any news when the ports are being unfrozen ?
Portaudit is now detecting a few problems
Surly it is beneficial to keep the ports current with security updates
during a freeze ?
Cheers
Craig B
This email has been handled by
On 5/15/07, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> I also need to quickly look up origin -> pkgname and would suggest
> placing this in the INDEX file. Then you have the foundation in place to
> be able to run 'make vim-7.1.2.tbz' in, say, /usr/ports/ and it
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 08:48:59PM -0700, Andriy Babiy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to try making the port, but faced a problem:
>
> The requested URL /spca50x/Download/gspcav1-20070110.tar.gz was not found
> on this server.
> Apache/ProXad [Apr 14 2007 12:48:55] Server at mxhaard.free.fr
>
> This
21 matches
Mail list logo
