Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> What I propose is:
> - Change variable naming scheme.
> All *BASE and *DIR vars should be reverted to their original meanings
> (i.e. local paths). Instead, INSTALL_ vars should be introduced:
> INSTALL_LOCALBASE=${DESTDIR}/${LOCALBASE}
> INSTALL_X11BASE=${DESTDIR}/${X11BA
So now that Dmitry sounded a sober thought, I'll give a one
of my own.
I would rather see PREFIX respect DESTDIR and go through
all the pains of respecting PREFIX. This way we reach a
double cause:
* ensure PREFIX is respected (this will reveal thousands of
erring ports, but it will be worth it)
On 8/15/06, Dmitry Marakasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* I don't think DESTDIR compatibility can be tested automatically, so
this would make freebsd user's life easier (user will be sure that after he
installs ports into [jail|other freebsd installation mounted via
nfs|locally] being set c
Synopsis: Update Port: net/nph fix to pkg-install script.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: shaun
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Aug 15 01:47:20 UTC 2006
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Re-assign; Missing a '-bugs'.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr
Hi!
I'm now exploring new DESTDIR-related stuff, and I find it far from
being useable. More of that, DESTDIR-related changes seem dangerous
to me.
As far as I understand, for port to support DESTDIR, it's files
should be installed into ${DESTDIR}/${PREFIX}/foo (aka ${TARGETDIR}/foo),
but all path
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 09:19:00PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> All I see is the following update with the text "update to version 9.3.7,
> approved by: maintainer timeout" by danfe (there were no PRs with libticables
> in the Synopsis):
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/comms/libtic
Synopsis: Update Port: net/nph fix to pkg-install script.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: pirzyk->freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: pirzyk
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Aug 14 18:35:48 UTC 2006
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Reasign to the freebsd-ports group so they can commit the change.
http://ww
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 02:31:05PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +-le 14/08/2006 20:26 +0800, Gea-Suan Lin a dit :
> | Hello,
> |
> | I disagree this opinion. DESTDIR should be considered previous events
> | like importing SHA-256, @dirrmtry, and using USE_LDCONFIG to retire
> | INSTALLS
+-le 14/08/2006 20:26 +0800, Gea-Suan Lin a dit :
| Hello,
|
| I disagree this opinion. DESTDIR should be considered previous events
| like importing SHA-256, @dirrmtry, and using USE_LDCONFIG to retire
| INSTALLS_SHLIB, ... etc.
|
| When upgrading or bug-fixing with respecting DESTDIR, the pr s
Hello,
I disagree this opinion. DESTDIR should be considered previous events
like importing SHA-256, @dirrmtry, and using USE_LDCONFIG to retire
INSTALLS_SHLIB, ... etc.
When upgrading or bug-fixing with respecting DESTDIR, the pr should
not be splited into two parts.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10
Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ .
A list by MAINTAINER is
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/
so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In
addition, the li
Hello!
From http://wikitest.freebsd.org/DESTDIR - use ${LOCALBASE} is always
ok. But use ${LOCALBASE} with "port test" fails, as it use
PREFIX=/tmp/portname and ${LOCALBASE} is /usr/local indeed. Have I
missed something?
--
With respect,
Boris
___
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has bee
13 matches
Mail list logo
