Hello, On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 02:31:05PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +-le 14/08/2006 20:26 +0800, Gea-Suan Lin a dit : > | Hello, > | > | I disagree this opinion. DESTDIR should be considered previous events > | like importing SHA-256, @dirrmtry, and using USE_LDCONFIG to retire > | INSTALLS_SHLIB, ... etc. > | > | When upgrading or bug-fixing with respecting DESTDIR, the pr should > | not be splited into two parts. > | > | On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:59:02AM +0000, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > |> Synopsis: [PATCH] ftp/p5-Net-FTPServer: Respect DESTDIR > |> > |> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > |> State-Changed-By: mat > |> State-Changed-When: Mon Aug 14 10:51:42 UTC 2006 > |> State-Changed-Why: > |> Committed in two parts, the DESTDIR, then the other things. I think that > |> when doing a DESTDIR change, you should not change anything not directly > |> related to it, to keep things simple. > |> > |> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=101840 > > Hum, all the previous things, SHA/dirrmtry, etc were done as big sweeps > separately, not with other things in them. > Unless I don't understand what you're saying, we have the same opinion. > > -- > Mathieu Arnold
What I mention is not these one-shot commits but the PRs between the time of introducing SHA256/@dirrmtry and large scale commits. Importing SHA256 checksum was in 2005/11/08. After that, there were many people sending upgrading/fixing PRs with adding SHA256 at same time. Then in 2006/1/22, all ports were done. So I think DESTDIR is same. -- * Gea-Suan Lin (public key: Using https://keyserver.pgp.com/ to search) * If you cannot convince them, confuse them. -- Harry S Truman _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
