Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
On 31-05-2011 19:45, Max Laier wrote:
On 05/31/2011 07:41 AM, Tom Lusty wrote:
Does anyone know the status of carpdev being ported over to
FreeBSD? I know there was some progress on this back in 2008-09,
but haven't seen anything since. I'm hoping that s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-05-2011 19:45, Max Laier wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 07:41 AM, Tom Lusty wrote:
>> Does anyone know the status of carpdev being ported over to
>> FreeBSD? I know there was some progress on this back in 2008-09,
>> but haven&
On 05/31/2011 07:41 AM, Tom Lusty wrote:
Does anyone know the status of carpdev being ported over to FreeBSD? I know
there was some progress on this back in 2008-09, but haven't seen anything
since. I'm hoping that someone has a more recent update.
I have repeatedly posted p
Hello All,
Does anyone know the status of carpdev being ported over to FreeBSD? I know
there was some progress on this back in 2008-09, but haven't seen anything
since. I'm hoping that someone has a more recent update.
Thanks,
Hello,
According to OpenBSD's PF manual, located here :
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html
It describes a directive that can be passed to CARP , called "carpdev",
which "specifies the physical network interface that belongs to this
redundancy group"
I was curious if anyone knew if there were plans for importing/committing
carpdev with IPv6 support? I have been informed that carp and rtadvd will
not work without this or some equivalent.
I have a firewall I can help test with if necessary.
Cheers,
Geoffrey
On 2009/12/30 08:06, kevin wrote:
I have committed a patch that makes pf w/DSR setup work a week ago but
have not yet MFC'ed it, the patch can be directly applied against
8-STABLE, though.
Would you be able to share the patch with me? I am on 7.2-RELEASE, however.
The patch should work cleanl
>I have committed a patch that makes pf w/DSR setup work a week ago but
>have not yet MFC'ed it, the patch can be directly applied against
>8-STABLE, though.
Would you be able to share the patch with me? I am on 7.2-RELEASE, however.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Kevin
_
+ pf + carp. Not having carpdev is unfortunate -- it limits my
> options with my current network environment :/
Shouldn't be a panic but a very hard hang. (except if you use
CURRENT or have WITNESS turned on). This can be worked around by
disallowing sending ARP broadcast on the bridge
tation on CARP, they allow an ifconfig carp
> directive called 'carpdev', which allows you to manually specify which
> physical interface you want to be associated with the redundancy group.
Unfortunately the current FreeBSD CARP does not support carpdev...
eri@ is working on bringing our
> There is a LOR between CARP and if_bridge, I have a very brute force
> workaround which is not suitable to commit against -HEAD :(
I have experienced a kernel panic when playing around with transparent bridging
+ pf + carp. Not having carpdev is unfortunate -- it limits my options w
Hello,
I am currently evaluating high availability firewalls with carp
(7.2-RELEASE, PF) and have run into a problem that I would hope someone here
can explain for me.
According to OpenBSD's documentation on CARP, they allow an ifconfig carp
directive called 'carpdev', whic
Tom Uffner wrote:
what happened with the effort to port "ifconfig ... carpdev ..." to
FreeBSD?
the last messages mentioning it were posted a bit more than a year ago.
if i remember correctly, there was a patch for IPv4 only. it was considered
Beta test quality and a few people wer
what happened with the effort to port "ifconfig ... carpdev ..." to
FreeBSD?
the last messages mentioning it were posted a bit more than a year ago.
if i remember correctly, there was a patch for IPv4 only. it was considered
Beta test quality and a few people were using it. but since t
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 4/11/08, Alexander Vyrlanovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I mean ifconfig carp0 carpdev iface
> to attach carp pseudo-device to iface.
>
> The goals is to have physical iface and attached carp device
> configured in different IP subnets like OpenBSD can do.
> (f
I mean ifconfig carp0 carpdev iface
to attach carp pseudo-device to iface.
The goals is to have physical iface and attached carp device
configured in different IP subnets like OpenBSD can do.
(for example if ISP assign /30 subnet to me, where only two IPs
can be located)
On 10 апр. 2008, at 18
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 16:10 +0300, Alexander Vyrlanovich wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> Does anybody know about carpdev implementation status on FreeBSD?
>
> Is it safe to use Max's patch from 10 January 2008 in production?
>
I do not know of the specific patch at this moment,
Hi list!
Does anybody know about carpdev implementation status on FreeBSD?
Is it safe to use Max's patch from 10 January 2008 in production?
Thanks,
Alexander Vyrlanovich
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
On 1/13/08, Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/11/08, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thank you. Do you see the states on the backup machine when it is in the
> > backup status mode?
> >
> > pfctl -ss
> >
> > You should see a similar output on the backup machine a
On 1/11/08, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you. Do you see the states on the backup machine when it is in the
> backup status mode?
>
> pfctl -ss
>
> You should see a similar output on the backup machine as the primary.
Yes, the output is the same...
>
>
> BTW: I did not know
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 1/11/08, Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW: I did not know about ifconfig interconnect... Cool stuff!!
This would appear to be as the result of a command such as:
ifconfig em0 name interconnect
And as such you can rename any interface on your sy
On 1/11/08, Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> FW1:/usr/home/ale $ ifconfig pfsync0
> pfsync0: flags=41 metric 0 mtu 1460
> pfsync: syncdev: interconnect syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128
>
> FW1:/usr/home/ale $ ifconfig interconnect
> interconnect: flags=8843
> metric 0 mt
On 1/11/08, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 1/11/08, Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I have one interface on each machine dedicated to pfsync.
>
> Can you show us the output of ifconfig pfsync0 on each host?
FW1:/usr/home/ale $ ifconfig pfsync0
pfsync0:
On 1/11/08, Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I have one interface on each machine dedicated to pfsync.
Can you show us the output of ifconfig pfsync0 on each host?
Scott
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
On 1/11/08, Kian Mohageri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 8:18 PM, Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/11/08, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > That's good to hear, keep us up to date!
> >
> > The neverending history finish here !! haahahah
> >
> > E
On Jan 10, 2008 8:18 PM, Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/11/08, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > That's good to hear, keep us up to date!
>
> The neverending history finish here !! haahahah
>
> Everything work as expected, carp with failover is awesome !! The only
On 1/11/08, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's good to hear, keep us up to date!
The neverending history finish here !! haahahah
Everything work as expected, carp with failover is awesome !! The only
thing that i noted is that the active conections is being broken
during failover (ma
perfect ! (until now). I just tested the running config with
> carp (real network interface without ip address and using ifconfig
> carpdev option to associate carp interface with real network
> interface) if nothing bad happened until tomorrow, I will put another
> machine to test al
e without ip address and using ifconfig
carpdev option to associate carp interface with real network
interface) if nothing bad happened until tomorrow, I will put another
machine to test all carp faillover features and let you know.
Thank you Max for your great work
ot;,
- state, carpr.carpr_vhid, carpr.carpr_advbase,
- carpr.carpr_advskew);
+ printf("\tcarp: %s carpdev %s vhid %d advbase %d advskew %d\n",
+ state, carpr.carpr_carpdev, carpr.carpr_vhid,
+
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2007 7:11 PM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... the neverending story continues :-\
> >
> > I am making progress ... really, really slowly as I'm not at the top
> > of my health (inflammation in my front teeth) and 7.0
On Oct 27, 2007 7:11 PM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... the neverending story continues :-\
>
> I am making progress ... really, really slowly as I'm not at the top of my
> health (inflammation in my front teeth) and 7.0 got in the way, too.
>
> Anyways, here is something for *BETA* tes
state = carp_states[carpr.carpr_state];
- printf("\tcarp: %s vhid %d advbase %d advskew %d\n",
- state, carpr.carpr_vhid, carpr.carpr_advbase,
- carpr.carpr_advskew);
+ printf("\tcarp: %s carpdev %s vhid %d advbase %d advskew %d\n",
+ state, carpr.c
On Friday 12 October 2007, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:55:02AM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> > On Friday 12 October 2007, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> > > On 9/19/07, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > So here you go ... this i
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:55:02AM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> On Friday 12 October 2007, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> > On 9/19/07, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So here you go ... this is the ***ALPHA*** version of carpdev
> > > support. Note th
On Friday 12 October 2007, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> On 9/19/07, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So here you go ... this is the ***ALPHA*** version of carpdev
> > support. Note that there are *a lot* of raw edges, untested areas and
> > missing features s
On 9/19/07, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So here you go ... this is the ***ALPHA*** version of carpdev support.
> Note that there are *a lot* of raw edges, untested areas and missing
> features still, but "it's working"[tm].
>
Hi Max !
An
ed. Also, the
proposed
> > ioctl change is not the preferred way of doing things. If you pass in
> > an interface index, there is no way of making sure that the interface
> > didn't change underneath you - that's why we rather pass the whole
> > string and do
way of making sure that the interface
> didn't change underneath you - that's why we rather pass the whole
> string and do the resolution in the kernel.
So here you go ... this is the ***ALPHA*** version of carpdev support.
Note that there are *a lot* of raw edges, untested areas
On Saturday 15 September 2007, Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
> Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
> > I have implemented at FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE.
> > http://www.nabble.com/file/p12686194/carpdev.diff carpdev.diff
> > Is a working solution, but not 100% failsave.
> > See fixme.
>
> argl.. need some more tweaks.
>
>
ork.
fixed that it add a network, but now kernels cries to receive the arp
at the parent interface and not at the carp interface...
bye,
Ingo
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ifconfig-carpdev-tf4309277.html#a12687223
Sent from the freebsd-pf mailing list arc
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
>
>
>> On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
>> > Someone have news about ifconfig carpdev option implementation on
>> > FreeBSD ?
>
I have implemented at FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE.
http://www.nabble.com/file/p12686
On 8/22/07, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> > Someone have news about ifconfig carpdev option implementation on
> > FreeBSD ?
>
> I'm preoccupied with academia at the moment. I will do it
On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> Someone have news about ifconfig carpdev option implementation on
> FreeBSD ?
I'm preoccupied with academia at the moment. I will do it after September
10th.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PRO
Hi guys !
Someone have news about ifconfig carpdev option implementation on FreeBSD
?
I'm glad to test any patches!
Kind Regards,
Alexandre Biancalana
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
On 7/20/07, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am working on a patch to bring over carpdev functionality sponsored by
pil.sk This will, however, take a bit longer than I initially though it
would.
Any news about it ?
___
freebsd-pf@freeb
On 7/20/07, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am working on a patch to bring over carpdev functionality sponsored by
pil.sk This will, however, take a bit longer than I initially though it
would.
Great !!
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org m
ve, it must send out hello packets on a
particular interface. Under OpenBSD, I believe there is a "carpdev"
option for ifconfig, which allows you to set the interface explicitly.
However, FreeBSD's implementation (at least in 6.x where I'm familiar
with it) is missing that opt
I am working on a patch to bring over carpdev functionality sponsored by
pil.sk This will, however, take a bit longer than I initially though it
would.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X
ackets on a
particular interface. Under OpenBSD, I believe there is a "carpdev"
option for ifconfig, which allows you to set the interface explicitly.
However, FreeBSD's implementation (at least in 6.x where I'm familiar
with it) is missing that option. Instead, the interfa
, it must send out hello packets on a
particular interface. Under OpenBSD, I believe there is a "carpdev"
option for ifconfig, which allows you to set the interface explicitly.
However, FreeBSD's implementation (at least in 6.x where I'm familiar
with it) is missing that option. In
ation you are referring to, but this is
FreeBSD we are talking about. The implementation is not the same.
In order for CARP to be effective, it must send out hello packets on a
particular interface. Under OpenBSD, I believe there is a "carpdev"
option for ifconfig, which allows you to se
On 7/20/07, Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/19/07, Marko Lerota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How can I associate carp interface with physical interface without
ifconfig
>carpdev option and without have more ips available in the same network of
>carp in
252
Default Router: 192.168.1.1
How can I associate carp interface with physical interface without ifconfig
carpdev option and without have more ips available in the same network of
carp interface ?
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
You can easily implement CARP on this.
> Carp documentation describes that carp interface is associated with
> physical interfaces via ip address configuration. How can I associate carp
> interface with physical interface without carpdev ? Exists some patch that
> port this funcionali
rface with physical interface without carpdev ? Exists some patch that
port this funcionality from OpenBSD to 6-STABLE ? When it will be available
?
Thanks for any hints
Alexandre
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
I'm trying to replace several ciscos with a pair of freebsd routers running
carp. The problem I'm having is that I need to be able to tie carp to a
specific vlan interface. My search for carpdev led to 3 messages that didn't
seem to have replies.
Who, if anyone, is actively supp
As far as I know, the carpdev code from OpenBSD has not yet been
ported. I've been wanting to have this in FreeBSD myself for awhile
now, and was planning to spend some time on porting the OpenBSD code
over, but have not had time to get to it yet. If I do get to it
before someone else
Hi,
I see in the OpenBSD documentation that they have a "carpdev" option
to specify which physical interface the redundancy group should run on.
FreeBSD (current 6.2 code) doesn't have that option -- is there
another way to accomplish the same thing?
- ask
--
http:/
I need to add differente subnet ip on the same carp interface
but I need to use carpdev.. but there isn't on 6.1
Do you know when carpdev will be imported on 6-stable?
kind regard
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
ig. The change to support this carpdev option looks like it was
> added about a year and a half ago to OpenBSD, but it has not been merged
> into FreeBSD yet. I would like to have support for this on my routers,
> and I am interested in trying to port these changes over to FreeBSD.
>
&g
ge to support this carpdev option looks like it was
added about a year and a half ago to OpenBSD, but it has not been merged
into FreeBSD yet. I would like to have support for this on my routers,
and I am interested in trying to port these changes over to FreeBSD.
I have two questions, however. First,
amp;w=2
Is a pach against OpenBSD-current that might be appearing in OpenBSD
3.7 that adds the carpdev keyword and binding to a physical interface.
--
Jon Simola
Systems Administrator
ABC Communications
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
Hi All,
I've been testing the release of CARP that's included in 5.4-PRERELEASE
running on top of a vlan interface, and I realized that carpdev is not
an option for ifconfig when bringing up the CARP interface. Just
wondering... If you don't have a place to specify the carp devic
65 matches
Mail list logo
