Getting involved

2012-09-10 Thread Walt Elam
All, I would like to get involved with PF development for FreeBSD. I use it at home and have a background in C programming. How do I go about getting involved? I've got an extra machine or two that I could do testing with, so if you could share your setups for testing bugfixes and whatnot

Re: Getting Involved

2012-01-27 Thread Ermal Luçi
penBSD kinda ipfw(4) used to be in the old days on FreeBSD. > > From: owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org] On Behalf > Of Peter Jeremy [peterjer...@acm.org] > Sent: 27 January 2012 10:55 > To: Walt Elam > Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org

Re: Getting Involved

2012-01-26 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 27. Jan 2012, at 03:09 , Walt Elam wrote: > Peter, thanks for your incredible detailed reply. That's exactly what I was > looking for. > > I figure I would download all of the OpenBSD code, but does anyone have > any pointers as to what parts of OpenBSD have the pf code? I suppose I > could

RE: Getting Involved

2012-01-26 Thread Greg Hennessy
[SNIP] I suppose I could e-mail the original PF list to figure that out though. [SNIP] Pack your flak jacket and kevlar cricket box ;-) ___ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any

Re: Getting Involved

2012-01-26 Thread Walt Elam
he wrong end of the stick on my part though. > > From: owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org] On > Behalf Of Peter Jeremy [peterjer...@acm.org] > Sent: 27 January 2012 10:55 > To: Walt Elam > Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Getting Inv

RE: Getting Involved

2012-01-26 Thread Greg Hennessy
eebsd...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Peter Jeremy [peterjer...@acm.org] Sent: 27 January 2012 10:55 To: Walt Elam Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting Involved [SNIP] The whole problem is that the new syntax is not backward compatible with the old syntax. There has recently been a fairly

Re: Getting Involved

2012-01-26 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2012-Jan-23 00:42:13 -0500, Walt Elam wrote: >I searched a bit this weekend and couldn't figure out where exactly to >download the code for OpenBSDs PF. Unlike things like OpenSSH, PF was not developed and is not available as a standalone, portable package. The only way to get the code is to

Re: Getting Involved

2012-01-23 Thread Damien Fleuriot
ported over that accepts the new rule syntax since it becomes >> increasingly harder to find documentation, help, and tutorials for the >> older syntax. >> >> If anyone could point me in the right direction for getting involved, that >> would be great. >&g

Re: Getting Involved

2012-01-23 Thread Ermal Luçi
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Greg Hennessy wrote: > > > > > There is one catch. > > FreeBSD does not want to break compatibility of old syntax and that is > why > > i did not port the latest version of pf(4). > > Shades of the versioning/maintenance issues surrounding putting Perl in > the ba

Re: Getting Involved

2012-01-23 Thread Ermal Luçi
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > On 21. Jan 2012, at 23:26 , Greg Hennessy wrote: > > >>> > >> There is one catch. > >> FreeBSD does not want to break compatibility of old syntax and that is > why > >> i did not port the latest version of

Re: Getting Involved

2012-01-22 Thread Walt Elam
I didn't intend to stir things up, too much. But was just hoping to get involved in helping get something ported over to use the new syntax. I was thinking exactly what someone else posted earlier, where there could be something placed in rc.conf to indicated what syntax you wanted to use. I searc

Re: Getting Involved

2012-01-21 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 21. Jan 2012, at 23:26 , Greg Hennessy wrote: >>> >> There is one catch. >> FreeBSD does not want to break compatibility of old syntax and that is why >> i did not port the latest version of pf(4). > > Shades of the versioning/maintenance issues surrounding putting Perl in the > base way ba

RE: Getting Involved

2012-01-21 Thread Greg Hennessy
> > > There is one catch. > FreeBSD does not want to break compatibility of old syntax and that is why > i did not port the latest version of pf(4). Shades of the versioning/maintenance issues surrounding putting Perl in the base way back in the day. > What is there now makes it 'trivial' to go

Re: Getting Involved

2012-01-21 Thread Ermal Luçi
t becomes > increasingly harder to find documentation, help, and tutorials for the > older syntax. > > If anyone could point me in the right direction for getting involved, that > would be great. > > There is one catch. FreeBSD does not want to break compatibility of old syntax and that is

Re: Getting Involved

2012-01-20 Thread Виталий Владимирович
--- Original message --- From: "Walt Elam" To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Date: 21 January 2012, 00:27:34 Subject: Getting Involved > I would like to help with the development of the PF port for FreeBSD but am > not quite sure how to get involved. More specifically,

Getting Involved

2012-01-20 Thread Walt Elam
older syntax. If anyone could point me in the right direction for getting involved, that would be great. Thanks, -Walt ___ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to