On 1/21/12 5:41 PM, Ermal Luçi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Walt Elam <wre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I would like to help with the development of the PF port for FreeBSD but am >> not quite sure how to get involved. More specifically, I would like to help >> get something ported over that accepts the new rule syntax since it becomes >> increasingly harder to find documentation, help, and tutorials for the >> older syntax. >> >> If anyone could point me in the right direction for getting involved, that >> would be great. >> >> > There is one catch. > FreeBSD does not want to break compatibility of old syntax and that is why > i did not port the latest version of pf(4). > > What is there now makes it 'trivial' to go to the latest pf(4) version in > Open but there needs to be a layer of translation > for the old syntax to new syntax. > > That is te only reason its not been done. >
While we're at it, are there any plans for being able to include files to the main PF conf ? Currently, we're emulating this using anchors, but plain includes would be nicer. The way I see it here, in our own environment, we'd have a first include with our interface definitions, another with options and so on... _______________________________________________ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
