>
>
>
> -
> This message sent via VFEmail.net
> http://www.vfemail.net
> $14.95 Lifetime accounts - 1GB disk, No bandwidth quotas!
>
> ___
> freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
> http
ir),
+ hdr->ifname,
+ hdr->label);
+#endif
+
}
u_int
Petersen, Mark yazmis:
Great, I would love to try a patch for 7.0. Do you have a patch for wireshark/
tshark/mergecap as well by any chance? Have you submitted these patches to Ope
nBSD people? A
2336/0(match): pass in on em0: label 70:
(tos 0x0, ttl 128, id 1054, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: TCP (6),
length: 48) 192.168.6.2.4252 > 1.2.3.4.443: S, cksum 0x1480 (correct),
3376786061:3376786061(0) win 65535
Thanks,
N. Ersen SISECI
http://www.enderunix.org
Petersen, Mark yazmış:
>
the default rule is block, i
will notice this situation.
Ersen.
Daniel Hartmeier yazmış:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:20:34PM +0200, N. Ersen SISECI wrote:
>
>
>> I changed PF's default rule in kernel (pf_ioctl.h). And than i restarted
>> my server.
>>
>
fier is given, otherwise they are
still subject to /block/ and /pass/ rules.
But, i think it's not working as desribed above.
Nat's pass option depends the PF's default rule in the kernel.
Is there anything i missed or wrong?
Thanks.
N. Ersen SISECI
http://w
ep track of incoming interface as well as the outgoing
interface...
Thanx for your help
N. Ersen SISECI
http://www.enderunix.org
Daniel Hartmeier yazm?s,:
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 01:36:52PM +0300, N. Ersen SISECI wrote:
> >
> >
>
>> >> My first rule i
t; 10.0.0.2.22: S, cksum 0xc573
N. Ersen SISECI
http://www.enderunix.org
EnderUNIX SDT @ Turkey
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
t; 10.0.0.2.22: S, cksum 0xc573
N. Ersen SISECI
http://www.enderunix.org
EnderUNIX SDT @ Turkey
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
use tcpdump to display logs entries from pflog0 interface,
tcpdump has to be patched also. Since the above patch changes a struct in
pflog, without patching tcpdump log packets appear truncated.
I tested both of patches in FreeBSD 5.4 and FreeBSD 6.0.
I attached the both of patches.
Sin
Hi,
Is it possible to someone to tell me which OpenBSD PF version is used
in 5.4, 5.5, 6.0 and 6.1?
For example,
FreeBSD 5.4 -> OpenBSD 3.6
FreeBSD 5.5 -> ??
FreeBSD 6.0 -> ??
FreeBSD 6.1 -> ??
Thank you.
N. Ersen SISECI
EnderUNIX SDT @ Turkey
http://www.e
Which pf version
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
:00.982095 bge0 @0:3 p 10.1.2.3,57221 ->
192.168.90.12,22 PR tcp len 20 64 -S K-S K-F OUT log-tag 110
Thanks,
N. Ersen SISECI
http://www.enderunix.org
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscr
12 matches
Mail list logo