The following reply was made to PR kern/114095; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?=
To: Gleb Smirnoff
Cc: nerijus.ambra...@ktu.lt, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/114095: [carp] carp+pf delay with high state limit
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2
The following reply was made to PR kern/114095; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: Ermal Lu?i
Cc: nerijus.ambra...@ktu.lt, freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/114095: [carp] carp+pf delay with high state limit
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:13:48 +0400
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:47:31PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
E> > This is a surprise for me that this feature had been removed!
E> >
E> > It used to be in stable/6:
E> >
E> > http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/ident?v=FREEBSD60;i=carp_suppress_preempt
E> >
E> > And I always treated that variable in CARP as s
2011/10/17 Gleb Smirnoff :
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 02:18:38PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
> E> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 4:20 PM, wrote:
> E> > Synopsis: [carp] carp+pf delay with high state limit
> E> >
> E> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> E> > State-Changed-By: glebius
> E> > State-Changed
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" writes:
Hello Bjoern,
> of this, and yes, the pf in FreeBSD still lacks it.
Ok. Thanks a lot for the answer.
Regards
Éric Masson
--
ça reste finalement une décision personnelle, sans contraintes
externes, puisqu'il n'y a rien à prouver dans ce domaine aux
variables exogè
Damien Fleuriot writes:
Hi Damien,
> I totally did not understand whatever you're trying to say.
> En d'autres termes, j'ai rien compris.
Pas grave ;)
> What do you call "inside nat" ?
The ability to trigger nat via incoming packets (useful in a nat before
vpn scenario), just like libalias do
On 17. Oct 2011, at 14:09 , Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> On 10/17/11 2:50 PM, Eric Masson wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does the PF 4.5 port present in -current & 9-STABLE support inside NAT
>> please (somewhat like the reverse nat available with libalias) ?
>>
>> Kind Regards
>>
>> Éric Masson
>>
>
>
On 10/17/11 2:50 PM, Eric Masson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does the PF 4.5 port present in -current & 9-STABLE support inside NAT
> please (somewhat like the reverse nat available with libalias) ?
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Éric Masson
>
I totally did not understand whatever you're trying to say.
En d'aut
The following reply was made to PR kern/114095; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: Ermal Lu?i
Cc: nerijus.ambra...@ktu.lt, freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/114095: [carp] carp+pf delay with high state limit
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:17:42 +0400
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 02:18:38PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
E> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 4:20 PM, wrote:
E> > Synopsis: [carp] carp+pf delay with high state limit
E> >
E> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
E> > State-Changed-By: glebius
E> > State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 14:20:00 UTC 2011
E> >
Hello,
Does the PF 4.5 port present in -current & 9-STABLE support inside NAT
please (somewhat like the reverse nat available with libalias) ?
Kind Regards
Éric Masson
--
Je n'ai pas envie de perdre mon temps à leur APD à la con. Mais j'ai
besoin du certificat qu'y est délivré, pour passer l
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 4:20 PM, wrote:
> Synopsis: [carp] carp+pf delay with high state limit
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: glebius
> State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 14:20:00 UTC 2011
> State-Changed-Why:
> Not a bug. This is a feature. pfsync(4) suppresses carp(4)
>
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
13 matches
Mail list logo
