2011/10/17 Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org>: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 02:18:38PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote: > E> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 4:20 PM, <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote: > E> > Synopsis: [carp] carp+pf delay with high state limit > E> > > E> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > E> > State-Changed-By: glebius > E> > State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 14:20:00 UTC 2011 > E> > State-Changed-Why: > E> > Not a bug. This is a feature. pfsync(4) suppresses carp(4) > E> > preemption until new recently booted node downloads full > E> > table of pf(4) states from its peer. > E> > E> This is not true on FreeBSD. > E> The issue might be from other reasons. > > This is a surprise for me that this feature had been removed! > > It used to be in stable/6: > > http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/ident?v=FREEBSD60;i=carp_suppress_preempt > > And I always treated that variable in CARP as shared with pf. Why did > they removed this feature from pfsync? >
OpenBSD has it but FreeBSD is SMP capable and global vars without synchronization do not work well. To support that you have to add cross-dependencies and synchronization between the two. Not only synchronization though even some housekeeping around.... I will probably give a look at this again after 9.0. > P.S. Since PR is about 6.2-RELEASE, then I have closed it correctly. > > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. > -- Ermal _______________________________________________ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
