Julian Elischer wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
If we want to provide a high quality event library for present and
future needs, somebody needs to sit down and write that.
But in either case, an eventlibrary should not be imported, unless
we have code that uses it, and unless we intend to mai
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
If we want to provide a high quality event library for present and
future needs, somebody needs to sit down and write that.
But in either case, an eventlibrary should not be imported, unless
we have code that uses it, and unless we intend to maintain it.
I quote fr
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> ports.
Agreed. While one can argue what the criteria should be for keeping
software in the base, IMO the chief criteria for ADDING software to
the base should be, "Will this be useful to a significant majority of
FreeBSD users?" I don't see how the answer to that question
On 06/06/07 16:29, Max Laier wrote:
> After several attempts to fix user/group rules which ended like the most
> recent one - cited below - with *ZERO* feedback, I won't waste anymore
> effort. Either somebody steps up, does proper testing and reports back,
> or user/group rules go! End of sto
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> After several attempts to fix user/group rules which ended like the most
> recent one - cited below - with *ZERO* feedback, I won't waste anymore
> effort. Either somebody steps up, does proper testing and reports back,
> or user/group rules go! End of s
On 06.06-16:29, Max Laier wrote:
[ ... ]
> and again ... the thread ends here - zero feedback received :-( Does
> anyone care about user/group rules at all? If so - speak up now or I'll
> just disable them with the upcoming update!!!
i'm afraid after loosing two systems to processor and memory
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:04:34PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> Hi Tillman,
>
> On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> > I think you might have missed some posts :-) I successfully built with
> > that patch and reported it:
>
> ahh ... you dropped -pf@ and myself from the CC-list. -cur
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:29:12PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> After several attempts to fix user/group rules which ended like the most
> recent one - cited below - with *ZERO* feedback, I won't waste anymore
> effort. Either somebody steps up, does proper testing and reports back,
> or user/grou
On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Chris Marlatt wrote:
> Max Laier wrote:
> > and again ... the thread ends here - zero feedback received :-( Does
> > anyone care about user/group rules at all? If so - speak up now or
> > I'll just disable them with the upcoming update!!!
>
> Unfortunately I can't claim
Hi Tillman,
On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> I think you might have missed some posts :-) I successfully built with
> that patch and reported it:
ahh ... you dropped -pf@ and myself from the CC-list. -current is just
too noisy to spot replys. Thanks for the info and sorry fo
Max Laier wrote:
and again ... the thread ends here - zero feedback received :-( Does
anyone care about user/group rules at all? If so - speak up now or I'll
just disable them with the upcoming update!!!
Unfortunately I can't claim to be seeing this symptom, but I do use
user/group rules
After several attempts to fix user/group rules which ended like the most
recent one - cited below - with *ZERO* feedback, I won't waste anymore
effort. Either somebody steps up, does proper testing and reports back,
or user/group rules go! End of story!
This is not personal against Tillman -
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:53:52AM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> On Monday 04 June 2007, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> > Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Anything else?
> >
> > ftp-proxy(8) and tftp-proxy(8) would be nice...
>
> ... I'm at it. Could you maybe lend a hand with importing lib
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= wr
ites:
>> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Convenient and portable, but buggy as hell - we used it in Varnish to
>> > begin with but had to ditch it due to a combination of design flaws and
>> > bugs.
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Max Laier wrote:
On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anything else?
ftp-proxy(8) and tftp-proxy(8) would be nice...
... I'm at
Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Convenient and portable, but buggy as hell - we used it in Varnish to
> > begin with but had to ditch it due to a combination of design flaws and
> > bugs. It also suffers from creeping featuritis - the lat
On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Anything else?
> > >
> > > ftp-proxy(8) and tftp-proxy(8) would be nice...
> >
> > ... I'm at it. Co
On Friday 01 June 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> [ moving this to the more specific list ]
> ...
> Anything else?
Contrary to earlier remarks, I'll do an almost complete import of pf as
per OpenBSD 4.1, not supported features will be disabled. These include
routing: tags, multipath, etc. and pfsync i
Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Anything else?
> > ftp-proxy(8) and tftp-proxy(8) would be nice...
> ... I'm at it. Could you maybe lend a hand with importing libevent[1]
> which is a requiremen
On Monday 04 June 2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anything else?
>
> ftp-proxy(8) and tftp-proxy(8) would be nice...
... I'm at it. Could you maybe lend a hand with importing libevent[1]
which is a requirement for ftp-proxy now? It should make a good
David,
On 06/06/07 01:44, David DeSimone wrote:
> Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> pass in on bla0 from any to bla0
>
>> which will all require pf to get the interface's IP address and all
>> will fail if that interface does not yet exist...
>
> Ah, here you are correct, but the reasons are
21 matches
Mail list logo
