On Mon, 26-Mar-2007 at 17:07:47 +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:58:20AM +0200, Volker wrote:
> > Andrew, Andre & all,
> >
> > I've checked it out once more (with a corrected setup) and now have
> > been able to block traffic on enc0 in both directions (no matter if
> > t
> Hi,
>
> I just want to know how to handle properly packets which pass
> through the firewall...
That depends on what you're trying to do exactly.
>
> I can handle for all packets coming to all interface of my
> firewall and the same with outgoing packets by using in/out
> with statement
Hi,
I just want to know how to handle properly packets which pass through
the firewall...
I can handle for all packets coming to all interface of my firewall and
the same with outgoing packets by using in/out with statement "on
$interface"
But what about forwarding packets ?
With iptables
we ca
On 03/26/07 08:47, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> On Mon, 26-Mar-2007 at 02:58:20 +0200, Volker wrote:
>> Andrew, Andre & all,
>>
>> I've checked it out once more (with a corrected setup) and now have
>> been able to block traffic on enc0 in both directions (no matter if
>> the tunnel endpoint is final d
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
o kern/82271 pf [pf] cbq scheduler cause bad latency
o kern/92949 pf [pf] PF + ALTQ problems
Synopsis: tagged parameter on nat not working
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-pf
Responsible-Changed-By: remko
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 26 09:11:58 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer group, although this might not be fixed in the
5_branch since (from
