On 1/18/06, Keith Bottner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having trouble allowing clients that are inside the PacketFilter
> firewall to retrieve data from external FTP sites. Connection works fine but
> a simple ls on the remote server returns a "Connection closed by remote
> host." My pf.conf i
I am having trouble allowing clients that are inside the PacketFilter
firewall to retrieve data from external FTP sites. Connection works fine but
a simple ls on the remote server returns a "Connection closed by remote
host." My pf.conf is below, any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 13:42, Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
> Moving to private only.
>
> >> Is it even possible in PF?
> >
> > I have no idea ;-)
>
> I don't think it is.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing
Works for FreeBSD 6x ... 5x with some restrictions.
--
/"\ Best regar
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Hennessy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Josh Finlay'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Sten Daniel Sørsdal'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:30 PM
Subject: RE: Multiple DSL lines, load sharing / shaping
>
>> I should also mention that eac
> I should also mention that each downloaded part would come
> from a different IP address
>
> so part 1 would be from IP1
> part 2 from IP2
> part 3 from IP3, etc etc
>
> All downloading concurrently, each part utilizing the 512kbps
> of each line...
> Then being possible to utilize the over
Moving to private only.
>> Is it even possible in PF?
>
> I have no idea ;-)
I don't think it is.
>
>> Are you talking about a webserver on your end and IP1 meaning an user
>> from the internet? Or the other way around?
>
> No sorry the other way around. IP1 is one of our lines, and by web
>
Is it even possible in PF?
I have no idea ;-)
Are you talking about a webserver on your end and IP1 meaning an user
from the internet? Or the other way around?
No sorry the other way around. IP1 is one of our lines, and by web server I
mean any webserver on the internet.
And are you usin
Josh Finlay wrote:
> Hi Sten,
>
> Ahh.. well that will be something for me to look into then. Give me a
> starting point anyway.
>
> Don't suppose you've had experience doing it in PF? ;-)
Is it even possible in PF?
> Now here is what I don't get
> We have 5x512=2560kbps (note: each line has a
I should also mention that each downloaded part would come from a different
IP address
so part 1 would be from IP1
part 2 from IP2
part 3 from IP3, etc etc
All downloading concurrently, each part utilizing the 512kbps of each
line...
Then being possible to utilize the overall bandwidth of all
Hi Sten,
Ahh.. well that will be something for me to look into then. Give me a
starting point anyway.
Don't suppose you've had experience doing it in PF? ;-)
Now here is what I don't get
We have 5x512=2560kbps (note: each line has a seperate IP address, same
provider though).
We want to dow
On 1/17/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And yet pf doesn't care about interfaces that don't exist if your
> syntax is correct.
> Note that I had
> to comment out the set loginterface which can't possibly work if tun0
> doesn't exist.
so pretty much it won't load at start time if
Josh Finlay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Took a good look at that link, sounds like it might do the trick.
>
> However I am curious about something...
> We have 5x 512kbps SDSL lines.
> Totalling 2560kbps.
> Is there any possible way to "bind" these lines together to make use of
> a full 2560kbps at once? Be
Hi,
Took a good look at that link, sounds like it might do the trick.
However I am curious about something...
We have 5x 512kbps SDSL lines.
Totalling 2560kbps.
Is there any possible way to "bind" these lines together to make use of a
full 2560kbps at once? Because with the round-robin method,
13 matches
Mail list logo
