Re: Bridge and PF

2005-08-12 Thread Max Laier
On Saturday 13 August 2005 00:40, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi, > > > This is not true. As Scott suggested try if_bridge in 6.0 which has both > > IPv6 > > and full pf support. Additionally, pf is supported by the old bridge > > just use the same settings you would use for ipf. The old bridge does

Re: Bridge and PF

2005-08-12 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi, > This is not true. As Scott suggested try if_bridge in 6.0 which has both > IPv6 > and full pf support. Additionally, pf is supported by the old bridge just > use the same settings you would use for ipf. The old bridge does not allow > for stateful filtering however. The same is true f

a problem about mpd,error 619

2005-08-12 Thread uainfo.net
My PC(vpn client OS:win2k) 80.73.10.xx || || NAT firewall 80.73.0.233 || || (^) (Internet ) ^ || || VPN server(freebsd 4.8+ipf+mpd) 212.42.77.xx || || LAN 192.168.0.

Newbie (Round II) ALTQ & pf

2005-08-12 Thread Kenneth Kalmer
Guys Thanks for the replies on my previous post for links on pf and altq, it really helped and I'm still reading up on some of the docs, very interesting stuff. I've got a Linux-based gateway that I'd like to try and replace with a FreeBSD one, currently I use the following features in iptables/i

Re: Bridge and PF

2005-08-12 Thread Rod
Unfortunately can't use a beta in the current environment and require stateful filtering, on this occasion looks like we will be using OpenBSD, but looking forward to FreeBSD6.0 Release. On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 16:51, Max Laier wrote: > On Friday 12 August 2005 17:45, Rod wrote: > > Found my answer

Fwd: kern/84801: kernel hangs with pf and route-to

2005-08-12 Thread Sergey Lapin
Copying to list, maybe someon be of any help. -- Forwarded message -- From: Sergey Lapin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Aug 12, 2005 8:03 PM Subject: Re: kern/84801: kernel hangs with pf and route-to To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here come data from debugger. login: ~KDB: enter: Line break

Re: Bridge and PF

2005-08-12 Thread Max Laier
On Friday 12 August 2005 17:45, Rod wrote: > Found my answer : > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-pf/2005-April/000984.html > > >FreeBSD has no support for pf in its bridge code. > >Neither has it IPv6 support. This is not true. As Scott suggested try if_bridge in 6.0 which has bo

Re: Bridge and PF

2005-08-12 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 8/12/05, Rod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Found my answer : > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-pf/2005-April/000984.html > > >FreeBSD has no support for pf in its bridge code. > >Neither has it IPv6 support. If your using FreeBSD 6 check out the new if_bridge facilities that d

Re: Bridge and PF

2005-08-12 Thread Rod
Found my answer : http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-pf/2005-April/000984.html >FreeBSD has no support for pf in its bridge code. >Neither has it IPv6 support. On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 16:02, Rod wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know if their is a setting similar to that of ipf and ipfw

Bridge and PF

2005-08-12 Thread Rod
Hi, Does anyone know if their is a setting similar to that of ipf and ipfw for setting bridged devices to use a firewall in sysctl e.g. for ipfw: net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw=1 for ipf net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw=1 Guessed at net.link.ether.bridge.pf=1 but no such luck. Is this at all possible w