Unfortunately can't use a beta in the current environment and require stateful filtering, on this occasion looks like we will be using OpenBSD, but looking forward to FreeBSD6.0 Release.
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 16:51, Max Laier wrote: > On Friday 12 August 2005 17:45, Rod wrote: > > Found my answer : > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-pf/2005-April/000984.html > > > > >FreeBSD has no support for pf in its bridge code. > > >Neither has it IPv6 support. > > This is not true. As Scott suggested try if_bridge in 6.0 which has both > IPv6 > and full pf support. Additionally, pf is supported by the old bridge just > use the same settings you would use for ipf. The old bridge does not allow > for stateful filtering however. The same is true for ipf and ipfw with the > old bridge code. > > > On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 16:02, Rod wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Does anyone know if their is a setting similar to that of ipf and ipfw > > > for setting bridged devices to use a firewall in sysctl e.g. > > > > > > for ipfw: > > > > > > net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw=1 > > > > > > for ipf > > > > > > net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw=1 > > > > > > Guessed at net.link.ether.bridge.pf=1 but no such luck. Is this at all > > > possible with PF on freebsd? > > > > > > kind regards > > > > > > Rod
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
