On Feb 11, 2013 10:44 PM, "h bagade" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I want to know if there is a way to find out if an interface address is
> assigned by dhcp or statically? For example, any distinctive flag or
> something like that on ifconfig output! or any other way except processing
> dhclient leases
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:02 AM, rathish mudaliar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I request you to kindly add me to your mailing list.
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
This is where you can go and subscribe.
cheers,
Hiren
>
>
> Regards
> Rathish.R
> _
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 14:07 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
>> Running 9.2 in production load mail servers. We're hitting the
>> "watchdog" message and crashing with the stable/9 version. We're
>> reverting the change from 2 weeks ago and seeing if i
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:36 AM, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>
> On Aug 21, 2013, at 1:00 , Mark Johnston wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > I've ported the ip, tcp and udp DTrace providers to FreeBSD, following
> > the Solaris documentation here:
> >
> > https://wikis.oracle.com/display/DTrace/ip+Provid
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Yuri wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 22:00, Mark Johnston wrote:
>>
>> The patch is here:
>>
>>
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~markj/patches/network-providers/network-providers-1.diff
>>
>> It depends on r254468. To use it, just recompile the kernel (assuming
>
>
> Your patc
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:25 AM, hiren panchasara <
hiren.panchas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:36 AM, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 21, 2013, at 1:00 , Mark Johnston wrote:
>>
>> > Hello!
>> >
>>
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On 9/6/13 12:10 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
>> tunable_mbinit() in kern_mbuf.c looks like this:
>>
>> 119 /*
>> 120 * The default limit for all mbuf related memory is 1/2 of all
>
tunable_mbinit() in kern_mbuf.c looks like this:
119 /*
120 * The default limit for all mbuf related memory is 1/2 of all
121 * available kernel memory (physical or kmem).
122 * At most it can be 3/4 of available kernel memory.
123 */
124 realmem
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On 9/6/13 12:36 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>> On 9/6/13 12:10 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
>>>
>>> tunable_mbinit() in
We are seeing an interesting thing on a mips board with 32MB ram.
We run out of mbuf very easily and looking at numbers it seems we are only
getting 6mb of maxmbufmem.
# sysctl -a | grep hw | grep mem
hw.physmem: 33554432
hw.usermem: 21774336
hw.realmem: 33554432
#
# sysctl -a | grep maxmbuf
on loader.conf instead of actually
auto tuning.
Thanks,
Hiren
>
> So my guess as to why this is the case: cut and paste worked, so nobody
changed it after that.
>
> # Still need to reads hiren's email to comprehend it...
>
> Warner
>
>
> >
> >
> > -ad
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 12:21 -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
> > On Sep 6, 2013 8:26 PM, "Warner Losh" wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sep 6, 2013, at 7:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > >
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 7 September 2013 12:56, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
>
>> I think the part of this that strikes me as strange is calling 20% of
>> physical memory used for network buffers a "very low value". It seems
>> outrageously high to me. I'd be pissed i
$ sysctl hw.igb
hw.igb.rxd: 4096
hw.igb.txd: 4096
hw.igb.enable_aim: 1
hw.igb.enable_msix: 1
hw.igb.max_interrupt_rate: 8000
hw.igb.buf_ring_size: 4096
hw.igb.header_split: 0
hw.igb.num_queues: 1
hw.igb.rx_process_limit: 100
$ sysctl hw.ix
sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.ix': No such file or directory
I t
I am new to netmap so thought of confirming my understanding.
I was trying to associate ixgbe interface with netmap and blast pkts to it
using tools/tools/netmap/pkg-gen.c
My setup looks like this:
FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA1 #2: Sun Sep 22 18:08:18 UTC 2013
-bash-4.2$ sysctl hw.physmem
hw.physmem: 5150
Any comments?
cheers,
Hiren
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:01 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
> $ sysctl hw.igb
> hw.igb.rxd: 4096
> hw.igb.txd: 4096
> hw.igb.enable_aim: 1
> hw.igb.enable_msix: 1
> hw.igb.max_interrupt_rate: 8000
> hw.igb.buf_ring_size: 4096
>
I am providing line rate traffic (via pkg-gen.c) to my 10gig ix interface.
Now on receiving side, is there a way to sub-divide the traffic into
multiple workloads using netmap?
For example, can I get two 5G flows from 10Gbps traffic?
cheers,
Hiren
___
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:07 AM, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
> >
> > I am providing line rate traffic (via pkg-gen.c) to my 10gig ix
> interface.
> >
> > Now on receiving side, is there a way to sub-div
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:53 AM, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:07 AM, hiren panchasara
>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Michio Honda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The handiest way to try flexible flow distribution is using Flow Director.
> I've confirmed that the patch posted to this list two years ago works with
> netmap/ixgbe.
>
> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Adding-Flow-Director-sys
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:27 PM, chintu hetam wrote:
> Hiren,
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/scaling.txt must read
> to understand nuances of each of this features. None of this techniques are
> used for mostly none other than performance reasons.
>
Thanks for the link.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:38 AM, hiren panchasara <
hiren.panchas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Michio Honda wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The handiest way to try flexible flow distribution is using Flow Director.
>> I'v
packets in same order.
>
> Michio, reason i asked for performance values
> http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1106/1106.0443.pdf
> I would like to test the accuracy of RFS,RSS and others in netmap mode..
>
> Thanks
> Hardik
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:59 AM, hire
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> 2013/9/27 Adrian Chadd
>
>> On 27 September 2013 00:43, hiren panchasara
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Takuya,
>>>
>>> I see a lot of responses/comments on proposed changes. Was anything
&g
>> - support perfect filter
>> But, at least it can configure signature filter manually.
>>
>> Usage is as follows:
>> Usage: ixgbetool [operation]
>> add_sig_filter
>> del_sig_filter
>>
>>
>> 2013/9/28 hiren panchasara
>>
+ jfv
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> please cc jfv and get them into his driver. :)
>
> -a
>
>
> On 24 September 2013 23:53, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
>> Any comments?
>>
>> cheers,
>> Hiren
>>
>> On
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is originally part of "ixgbetool" patch, but I think it can be discuss
> separately:
>
> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Adding-Flow-Director-sysctls-to-ixgbe-4-was-netmap-traffic-distribution-tp5847066p5847789.html
>
> I i
vents"
(I believe, "do not change the number of free" part is given when addition
is failing)
from
"Number of packets that missed matched any flow director filter"
to
"Number of packets that didn't match any flow director filter"
>
> 2013/10/1 hiren
Thanks Luigi.
Coming back to this thread to actually understand what's going on.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> > On this box, I have 2 interfaces igb0 (10.73.149.28) and ix1
> (10.73.149.17)
> > and this is how I am using this binary:
> >
> > -bash-4.2$ sudo ./pkt-ge
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:18 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
> Thanks Luigi.
>
> Coming back to this thread to actually understand what's going on.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> >
>> > On this box, I have 2 interfac
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:18 PM, hiren panchasara <
> hiren.panchas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks Luigi.
>>
>> Coming back to this thread to actually understand what's goin
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:15 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, hiren panchasara <
> hiren.panchas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:18 PM, hiren panchasara <
>> hiren.panchas...@
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:15 PM, hiren panchasara <
> hiren.panchas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, hiren panchasara <
>> hiren.panchas...@gm
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:34 AM, hiren panchasara <
> hiren.panchas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks Luigi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Coming back to this thread to actually
I am going to commit this change in the weekend.
Let me know if there are any objections.
Thanks,
Hiren
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:51 AM, hiren panchasara wrote:
> + jfv
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> please cc jfv and get them into hi
Thanks.
Committed via: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=256069
Cheers,
Hiren
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@fr
unable params
>> - IPv6 support on signature filter
>> - signature filter list
>> - support perfect filter
>> But, at least it can configure signature filter manually.
>>
>> Usage is as follows:
>> Usage: ixgbetool [operation]
>> add_sig_filt
Jack,
I am also seeing similar panics at $work on a couple weeks old STABLE-9.
Can you please look into this issue?
cheers,
Hiren
1) HP DL360e Gen8, 2 x Xeon E5-2430 2.20GHz
panic: buf=0xfe002810d700 already enqueue at 995 prod=997 cons=995
cpuid = 17
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wra
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 08/15/13 02:44, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>> On 14.08.2013 04:36, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>>> Hi Andre,
>>>
>>> [RE team is BCCed so they're aware of this discussion]
>>>
>>> On 07/06/13 00:58, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Author: andre
>>>
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> I lost the battle of wills on this topic and 10.0 shipped with IW10
> enabled by default :(
>
> As for having it configurable, it is a trivial patch which perhaps,
> Hiren, you might be willing to take a stab at? I obviously did not
> man
I am thinking of committing following change that includes port number
in "Listen queue overflow" messages.
New message would look something like:
sonewconn: pcb 0xf8001b155760: Listen queue overflow on port
13120: 1 already in queue awaiting acceptance (454 occurrences)
I've recently ran int
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:05:23PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> On 3/18/14, 8:33 PM, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>> >On Mar 7, 2014, at 1:23 , hiren panchasara
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >>I
Host A:1 talks to Host B:2 (1 and 2 being ports) and
it gets logged in tcp's hostcache.
Now if a new connection happens between A:10001 and Host B:2, the
initcwnd (initial congestion window) would not look at the CWND from
hostcache but will always use what we've set as tp->snd
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Robert Huff wrote:
> Hello:
> Is this the correct place to ask?
Yes.
Cheers,
Hiren
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Midori Kato wrote:
> Hi FreeBSD developpers,
>
> I'm Midori Kato. I'm working on the DCTCP implementation in the FreeBSD with
> Lars Eggert. I mail you because I would like to ask you a code review and
> testing. The attached patch is not good enough to test our c
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Midori Kato wrote:
> Hi FreeBSD developpers,
>
> I'm Midori Kato. I'm working on the DCTCP implementation in the FreeBSD with
> Lars Eggert. I mail you because I would like to ask you a code review and
> testing. The attached patch is not good enough to test our c
pkt_handler() function. We can probably pass that to
cc_encpkg_handler() while calling it from tcp_do_segment().
I'll make that change and see how it goes.
cheers,
Hiren
>
> Regards,
> -- Midori
>
>
> (4/3/14, 10:24 AM), hiren panchasara wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Mar
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Özkan KIRIK wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use suricata on FreeBSD 10 amd64.
> FreeBSD behaves as a VLAN router and NAT Box.
>
> Traffic is about 400Mbps.
> When i diverted traffic to suricata, swi: netisr 0 thread gets %100 cpu.
> other netisr threads are %0. And
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi! Cool! can you file a FreeBSD PR with this?
I'm testing this patch right now.
I will make sure it doesn't get lost. :-)
cheers,
Hiren
>
>
> -a
>
>
> On 2 April 2014 04:48, Midori Kato wrote:
>> Hi FreeBSD developers,
>>
>> I'm Midori Kat
(Note: This may seem more like a rant than an actual problem report.)
I am on a stable-10ish box with igb0. Workload is mainly inbound nfs
traffic. About 2K connections at any point in time.
device igb # Intel PRO/1000 PCIE Server Gigabit Family
hw.igb.rxd: 4096
hw.igb.txd: 4
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since folks are playing with Midori's DCTCP patch, I wanted to make sure that
> you were also aware of the patches that Aris did for PRR and NewCWV...
>>
>>
Lars,
There are no actual patches attached here. (Or the mailing-list dro
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:16 PM, hiren panchasara
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> since folks are playing with Midori's DCTCP patch, I wanted to make sure
>> that you were also aware of the patches
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Patrick Kelsey wrote:
>
> The output of netstat -Q shows IP dispatch is set to default, which is
> direct (NETISR_DISPATCH_DIRECT). That means each IP packet will be
> processed on the same CPU that the Ethernet processing for that packet was
> performed on, so C
The following reply was made to PR kern/184311; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: hiren panchasara
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, benjamin.st...@ub.uni-tuebingen.de
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/184311: [bge] [panic] kernel panic with bge(4) on SunFire
X2100
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 13:08:14 -0700
I
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> I assume that your pf(4) is enabled during these tests, you have
> "scrub" statements in the ruleset and removing "scrub" will restore
> the expected behaviour on 10.x?
I can confirm that I see exactly what you are saying on a stable/10
The following reply was made to PR kern/190102; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: hiren panchasara
To: Eygene Ryabinkin
Cc: FreeBSD GNATS followup ,
"freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
Subject: Re: kern/190102: [tcp] net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin=1 no longer works on
FreeBSD 10+ [regres
- bugs (as this is not related to it)
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> clearing FIN bit for SYN packets was
> the standard behaviour of pf since approximately at least 10 years,
>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/vendor-sys/pf/dist/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf_norm.c?view=
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:14 PM, hiren panchasara
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi! Cool! can you file a FreeBSD PR with this?
>
> I'm testing this patch right now.
>
> I will make sure it doesn't get lost. :-)
Commi
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, June 1, 2014, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:14 PM, hiren panchasara
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> >
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 12:31 AM, hiren panchasara
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:14 PM, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> Hi! Cool! can you file a FreeBSD PR with this?
>>
>> I'm testing this patc
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 6/8/2014 9:07 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
>> I wish to MFC this change and following actual dctcp changes (which
>> I'll commit to -head in coming weeks) to 10.
>>
>> Let me know if there is any objecti
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-net.
>
> It looks like, that some TCP connections could benefit from LEDBAT
> (RFC-6871) cognestion control algorithm (not all, of course, it should not
> be default).
>
> Also, it looks like Apple implements one
>
>
Reviving an old thread where Steve found this problem: A call to
getpeername on a connected tcp socket returns ENOTCONN with no prior
errors being reported by previous socket calls.
Please look at
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2011-January/027647.html
for more details.
Here is a
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 16:21 -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>> Reviving an old thread where Steve found this problem: A call to
>> getpeername on a connected tcp socket returns ENOTCONN with no prior
>> errors being report
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Bryan Venteicher
wrote:
> Awhile back, DragonlyFlyBSD added a netbw option to systat that I've ported
> to FreeBSD and found handy at various times:
>
>netbw Display aggregate and per-connection TCP receive and transmit
> rates. Only
+ freebsd-net@,
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
wrote:
> Bezüglich Jan Mikkelsen's Nachricht vom 24.06.2014 04:49 (localtime):
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’m bringing 9.3-RC1 into our local Perforce depot and moving our local
>> patches to 9.2 forward.
>>
>> I noticed that r256920 (changin
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:36 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, July 07, 2014 12:58:53 pm hiren panchasara wrote:
>> + freebsd-net@,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
>> wrote:
>> > Bezüglich Jan Mikkelsen's Nachricht v
+ Alexander
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Kajetan Staszkiewicz
wrote:
> The time has come to upgrade my routers to FreeBSD 9.3.
>
> While going through list of patches I had on 9.1, I've noticed that r248070
> got
> into 9.3 but r250764 did not. Why is that?
Probably just missed it.
cheers,
Return values in sendto() manpage says:
[ENOBUFS] The system was unable to allocate an internal buffer.
The operation may succeed when buffers become avail-
able.
[ENOBUFS] The output queue for a network interface was ful
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> So the UDP transmit path is udp_usrreqs->pru_send() == udp_send() ->
> udp_output() -> ip_output()
>
> udp_output() does do a M_PREPEND() which can return ENOBUFS. ip_output
> can also return ENOBUFS.
>
> it doesn't look like the sock
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov
wrote:
> On 15.07.2014 21:03, hiren panchasara wrote:
>>
>> + Alexander
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Kajetan Staszkiewicz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The time has come to upgrade my route
Is this the correct mailer for such questions?
-- Forwarded message --
From: hiren panchasara
Date: Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:47 AM
Subject: bridge interface type
To: freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org
I created bridge1 this way:
$ sudo ifconfig bridge create
Password:
bridge1
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Here is a patch that changes it but I do not know what may break.
>
Thanks a lot Andrew. So, someone might be relying on interface type of
bridge being IFT_ETHER?
Who can confirm if this is a good patch?
>
> Index: if_bridge.c
> ==
What is the difference between following 2 structs?
/src/sys/net/if_var.h: struct ifaddr (from the comments seems like it
contains a particular address (of probably many) information for an
interface.)
/src/include/ifaddrs.h: struct ifaddrs
Thanks in advance,
Hiren
__
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> struct ifaddr is the in-kernel representation of the interface address.
> In kernel each network interface consists of a linked list of interface
> addresses, described by ifaddr structures.
> See man ifnet(9): http://man.freebsd.org/ifne
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 6 March 2012 11:08, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Sergey Kandaurov
> wrote:
> >>
> >> struct ifaddr is the in-kernel representation of the i
Do we store network interfaces configuration information in any file that
survives reboots? (as Linux does it in /etc/network/interfaces)
Only thing I could find was when an interface needs address from DHCP,
rc.conf says ifconfig_em0="DHCP".
I know getifaddrs() can get you list of interfaces but
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
> In /etc/rc.conf
>
> See the man page for rc.conf for a more detailed use.
> See the small example bellow:
>
> ifconfig_re0="inet 192.168.0.30/24 up"
> defaultrouter="192.168.0.254"
>
> These are the very basics ;)
>
Thanks Damien.
I lo
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Juli Mallett wrote:
> In general, interfaces do
> not come from the configuration files like rc.conf, however the way
> that those interfaces are set up on boot is configured by files like
> rc.conf.
>
Thanks Juli.
So, does it mean that looking at getifaddrs() i
Looking at man rc.conf,
network_interfaces
(str) Set to the list of network interfaces to configure on
this host or “AUTO” (the default) for all current
interfaces.
Setting the network_interfaces variable to anything other
th
Can someone please help? :-)
On Mar 12, 2012 9:04 AM, "hiren panchasara"
wrote:
> Looking at man rc.conf,
>
> network_interfaces
> (str) Set to the list of network interfaces to configure
> on
> this host or “AUTO” (the default)
Thanks Chuck for getting back. I have a question inlined:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2012, at 10:18 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
> >> What difference does it make when I have each (separately) in my
> rc.conf:
> >>
> >>
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 14.03.2012 13:19, hiren panchasara пишет:
> > Thanks Chuck for getting back. I have a question inlined:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >
> >> On Mar 13, 2012,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Yuri wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 10:54, Glen Barber wrote:
>
>> Ok. Thanks for letting us know.
>>
>
> Now wpa_supplicant starts and is operational, however '/etc/rc.d/netif
> start' always issues this warning:
> Starting wpa_supplicant
> /etc/rc.d/wpa_supplicant: WA
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Michael Tuexen
wrote:
>
> On 09 Aug 2014, at 20:42, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
>> Niu Zhixiong wrote this message on Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 20:34 +0800:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Last month, I send problems related to FTP/TCP in a high RTT environment.
>>> After that, I
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Vlad Zolotarov
wrote:
> Hi, I have the most strange question about the TCP Rx window auto sizing
> implementation in a FreeBSD networking stack.
> When I looked at the FreeBSD code (hash
> 9abce0e567c9a5a0520cdd94d5c633c7baf9a184) I noticed that
> the mentioned abo
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Michael Tuexen
wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2014, at 21:40, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2014-8-11, at 21:27, Michael Tuexen
>> wrote:
>>> On 11 Aug 2014, at 14:12, Eggert, Lars wrote:
544/57/8194 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
>>
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:20 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 06, 2014 5:25:38 pm Jeremiah Lott wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We've been seeing a problem where a tcp connection is stuck in a zero
>> window condition and even though the client has opened more window space,
>> our FreeBSD box
I was looking for one and found
https://wiki.freebsd.org/SummerOfCode2008#TCP.2FIP_regression_test_suite_.28tcptest.29
which is a good start but needs a lot of love (work).
Please share if you are aware of any covering basic scenarios.
cheers,
Hiren
___
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Joseph Ward wrote:
> I found a workaround that is acceptable.
>
> First, I want to thank Hiren Panchasara for recommending the work-around
> that I hadn't thought about trying.
>
> For the archives and anyone struggling with the same issue:
working with
> Robert for the connection groups work a couple years or so back.
Thanks Anu.
It looks pretty good but I am looking for something more on open source side.
cheers,
Hiren
>
> Regards,
> -Anu
>
> On 8/11/14, 5:07 PM, "hiren panchasara" wrote:
>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> On 2014-8-28, at 10:31, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>> 73/3831/3091 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
>
> I just noticed that these are already there just after boot, and then also
> don't seem to be increasing anymore (or onl
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 11:32 +1000, Nigel Williams wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We recently released a new tech report "Design Overview of Multipath TCP
>> version 0.4 for FreeBSD-11" [1]. The report provides some details on
>> various aspects of the impl
Jack/ Eric,
When do you guys plan to bring this in the tree?
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?DwnldID=15815
cheers,
Hiren
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, se
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
> sorry for cross-posting, I'm forwarding this as it seems that part of
> the problem is also related to:
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2014-September/039664.html
Umm, this looks like a different problem than the subject of t
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 10:24:13AM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
>> > sorry for cross-posting, I'm forwarding this as it seems that part of
>> >
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:36:49PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 10:24:13AM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>> >> On Thu,
I am not aware of any work but adding -net to get more "networking" eyeballs.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Monday, October 20, 2014 a las 09:25:28AM +0200, Matthias Apitz
> escribió:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there any work started or in progress to implement TCP
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Eric Joyner wrote:
> So, what are the two fields on the media line for?
>
> AFAICT, it looks like the first field is the media the user wants to use
> (so the driver typically sets it to Ethernet autoselect by default?), and
> the
> second field is for the media th
I see this message on july 2014 time-frame -CURRENT. I tried to
disable IPv6 in rc.conf via ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="NO" without
success.
Has this been fixed? Or any workarounds?
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
