I think you meant "reply-all" :-) On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:53 AM, chintu hetam <rometor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As far as i know, flow director is Intel terminology it addresses both RSS > and RFS. I think FreeBSD implementation is RFS. > > Luigi, you touched upon SW de-multiplexer, i would like to know why it's > necessary. > let say i have 82599 ixgbe driver (RSS enabled)configured with 5 tuple > hash. My application reads from netmap queue 0-7(1-8), i know for sure that > each hash will be filtered to specific hw queue(0-7), is it safe to assume > netmap will provide packets in same order. > > Michio, reason i asked for performance values > http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1106/1106.0443.pdf > I would like to test the accuracy of RFS,RSS and others in netmap mode.. > > Thanks > Hardik > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:59 AM, hiren panchasara < > hiren.panchas...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:27 PM, chintu hetam <rometor...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hiren, >>> >>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/scaling.txt must >>> read to understand nuances of each of this features. None of this >>> techniques are used for mostly none other than performance reasons. >>> >> >> Thanks for the link. >> So, RFS (Receive Flow Steering) is equivalent to "flow director" >> mentioned in FreeBSD's ixgbe drivers? >> >>> >>> Michio, personally i am interested to know performance results in netmap >>> mode with RFS patch you just mentioned. >>> >> Takuya/Luigi might have some numbers. >> >> Thanks, >> Hiren >> >> <skip> >> >> > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
