On 5/19/14 21:00, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 19.05.2014 11:51, Bill Yuan wrote:
Hi Alex,
Hello Bill!
You guys are chatting here! I agree with you, the table is the place
should
be enhanced, and I am working in this way as described below
1. Support more types.
ip : cidr
ipv4 : sa
n/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
It will be nice to have this feature,
but since the `ipfw table list` is existing,
so I think this can be implemented outside the ipfw.
(personal op
at functions "out-of-the-box".
> Doing "test" function is quite easy. I'll probably do this after finishing
> new tables code merge.
>> I'm risking to be annoying, but there is a good (from customers point of
>> view) example of tables manipulation in
Hi Sato,
My fix is a temp solution, and actually you can just update the source code to
the latest version or use others. According to what I know, developer Alex is
currently working/enhancing the "ipfw table" feature. I think you will like the
new features.
Best Regar
command will be considered as “1 Byte per second”
root@FB10Head:~ # ipfw pipe 1 show
1: 8.000 bit/s 0 ms burst 0
q131073 50 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 65537 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail
sched 65537 type FIFO flags 0x0 0 buckets 0
bandwidth | device
Bandwidth, support 4 measurements,(Kbit/s, Mbit/s, KByte/s,
MByte/s) all others are officially not recommended.
With this document, Some mistakes can be prevented . for example this one:
>ipfw pipe 1 config bw 1BIT/s
Best Regards,
Bycn82
F
Ok, anyway, ignore it. :)
From: bycn82 [mailto:byc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 May, 2014 1:09
To: Alexander V. Chernikov; Luigi Rizzo
Cc: FreeBSD Net
Subject: RE: a defect in ipfw dummynet
Hi ,
After I think it twice, I think the code and the document are OK, But the
problem is from the
Sure your generic binary match could be a welcome
addition to ipfw. But its usefulness is extremely
limited in practice, as it only lets you match stuff
in fixed position of a packet, and it is not even good
to do other relatively simple things such as skip
options and the like.
Sure. W
-Original Message-
From: 'Luigi Rizzo' [mailto:ri...@iet.unipi.it]
Sent: 29 May, 2014 21:10
To: bycn82
Cc: 'FreeBSD Net'
Subject: Re: propose a new generic purpose rule option for ipfw
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:45:26PM +0800, bycn82 wrote:
...
>
> Su
:~ # ipfw table 1 list
1.2.3.4/32 0
root@FB10Head:~ #
Currently still cleaning the table handling function, and did not add the lock
in the kernel functions when changing the `mapping chain`.
Regards,
bycn82
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander V. Chernikov [mailto:melif...@i
accept that every object has
an integer ID.
Hi Alex,
Why not clean the ipfw_table_handler() function using the switch/case? Like in
my patch, It can be easier to understand the code.
Best Regards,
bycn82
> -Original Message-
> From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:ri...@iet.unipi.it]
> Sent
---Original Message-
> From: 'Luigi Rizzo' [mailto:ri...@iet.unipi.it]
> Sent: 05 June, 2014 23:54
> To: bycn82
> Cc: 'Alexander V. Chernikov'; 'FreeBSD Net'
> Subject: Re: [CFT]: ipfw named tables / different tabletypes
>
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 1
ce is biggest issue.
Any comments?
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:48:58PM +0800, bycn82 wrote:
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: 'Luigi Rizzo' [mailto:ri...@iet.unipi.it]
> > Sent: 29
Hi,
Yes, according to your pcap files,it is because of the window size.
more information here http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1323.txt
and share the result of "sysctl net.inet.tcp"
Regards,
bycn82
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:ow
eebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
Good job, Waiting for your code :)
Regards,
Bycn82
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
remove the "out" because "xmit" will check the "out interface".
Regards,
Bycn82
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org]
On Behalf Of Raimundo Santos
Sent: Tuesday, 28 October, 2014 3:32 PM
To: freebsd-net@f
ock 5"
otherwise, it will jump to N, because call the cases are nice in running
numbers,
but when the cases are messy, it will by just like lots of if/else
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Erich Dollansky <
erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 22
PM, Alfred Perlstein
wrote:
> Please run compiler with -O2 -S to get the assembly to see what will
> actually happen.
>
> thanks,
> -Alfred
>
>
> On 10/29/14 9:24 PM, bycn82 wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> According to my understanding in Java programming, the compiler
bsd email list, someone is doing this!
> > > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/
> >
> > We've had 'ipfw2' for a very long while. I couldn't help wondering why
> > DF wouldn't just import our many years of development and experience
>
ont of all these big
bosses. *
*Compare to the ipfw in FreeBSD, there are few differences. not a big deal.*
*1. modular*
*2. lock-less*
*3. old version*
*Regards,*
*Bycn82*
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Sato Kentney wrote:
>
> hi
> ok. i will test it.
> but he said it is faster
>
*So **please DON'T make me a joker in front of all these big bosses. *
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:10 PM, bycn82 wrote:
>
> *Hi Sato,*
>
> *I am also in this email list, If you have any question, You can ask,I
> just double checked whether I made mistake or not, and I only fou
*cool, I like this, it got some points.*
*though the email is too long to be read.*
On 3 February 2015 at 14:44, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 2/3/15 3:17 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>
>>
>> I propose two new actions: state-allow and state-deny.
>>
>> They imply "keep-state" and create new
*Cool, But maybe not all people are following this topic, so can you please
simplify it by answering below question in order to allow more people to
know what is going on here.*
*What kind of problem you are facing and how does your patch resolve it?*
On 4 February 2015 at 17:24, Lev Serebryako
23 matches
Mail list logo
