*So **please DON'T make me a joker in front of all these big bosses. *
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:10 PM, bycn82 <byc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > *Hi Sato,* > > *I am also in this email list, If you have any question, You can ask,I > just double checked whether I made mistake or not, and I only found "**To > be honest, my rewrite version of ipfw2 is nothing special but it runs on > this great system". So **please make me a joker in front of all these big > bosses. * > > *Compare to the ipfw in FreeBSD, there are few differences. not a big > deal.* > *1. modular* > *2. lock-less* > *3. old version* > > *Regards,* > *Bycn82* > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Sato Kentney <satokent...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> hi >> ok. i will test it. >> but he said it is faster >> >> 2014-12-15 15:26 GMT+08:00 Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it>: >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Sato Kentney <satokent...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > hi, >> > > his ipfw2 is ok for test now. >> > > http://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/12/11/15220.html >> > > i meet some problem in testing so asking qesstion in drafonflybsd's >> email >> > > list. >> > > and i want to know is it correct that the ipfw2 is faster than ipfw in >> > > freebsd? it is what he said. >> > >> > i don't think he ever said that, and in any case the code seems to be >> > taken straight from the 2002 freebsd version so i highly doubt there >> > is any speed difference (let alone a measurable one with packets >> > going through the kernel stack; to see an actual performance difference >> > you'd need to run the code through netmap or some high speed framework) >> > >> > see http://code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/ >> > >> > cheers >> > luigi >> > >> > > sure i will test it by myself. >> > > thanks >> > > >> > > On 25 November 2014 at 09:17, bycn82 <byc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> *that ipfw2 means "ipfw too", because it is originally from FreeBSD >> and >> > >> totally not new create things, IMHO* >> > >> >> > >> *BTW Sato, I think the in-kernel NAT is almost there, I tested the >> basic >> > >> NAT and it works in my lab environment.* >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Sato Kentney <satokent...@gmail.com >> > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> i agree, >> > >>> i am not good in english as networking administor from Tokyo. >> > >>> but when i read the page, i see that the main idea is so call >> "modular >> > >>> design" and there is a long way to catch up the freebsd's ipfw >> > >>> >> > >>> anyway, i dont think it can compare to freebsd's ipfw, as Smith said >> > their >> > >>> ipfw is the version without in-kernel NAT and tables .all these >> > important >> > >>> features >> > >>> >> > >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Ian Smith <smi...@nimnet.asn.au> >> > wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:48:13 +0800, Sato Kentney wrote: >> > >>> > >> > >>> > > I saw a email in dragonflybsd email list, someone is doing >> this! >> > >>> > > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/ >> > >>> > >> > >>> > We've had 'ipfw2' for a very long while. I couldn't help >> wondering >> > why >> > >>> > DF wouldn't just import our many years of development and >> experience >> > >>> > rather than using bycn82's 'rewrite'? .. but DF already has ipfw2: >> > >>> > >> > >>> > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=ipfw§ion=ANY >> > >>> > >> > >>> > man page dated October 2008. Before tables, in-kernel NAT, later >> > >>> > dummynet updates and no doubt more. So why not start from there? >> > >>> > >> > >>> > cheers, Ian >> > >>> > >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> -- >> > >>> ありがとう >> > >>> 佐藤柯德 >> > >>> Sato K. >> > >>> _______________________________________________ >> > >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> > >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > -- >> > > ありがとう >> > > 佐藤柯德 >> > > Sato K. >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org >> " >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- >> > Prof. Luigi RIZZO, ri...@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. >> dell'Informazione >> > http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa >> > TEL +39-050-2211611 . via Diotisalvi 2 >> > Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy) >> > >> -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- >> > >> >> >> -- >> ありがとう >> 佐藤柯德 >> Sato K. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
