attack conditions
(which justifies this selfish plug).
HTH,
Alex.
[1] http://www.web-polygraph.org/
[2]
http://www.web-polygraph.org/docs/reference/pgl/types.html#type:docs/reference/pgl/types/addr
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Why can some NIC use polling and others not ?
eg I went to turn on polling on my BCM5782 Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit
Ethernet Card. And bge(4) doesn't mention anything about polling.
Is it a hardware feature of the NIC ?
- aW
0n Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:13:51PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy w
Ahhnice !
Please send a HEADSUP when done.
Thanks
- aW
0n Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 07:38:15PM +1030, Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 03:54:17PM +1030, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> Why can some NIC use polling and others not ?
>
0n Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 05:52:30PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Nice, needs some cleanup though. Once you have cleaned it up you can run
> it either through me or [EMAIL PROTECTED] He is more of a IPv6 fan than I
am (in my
> book IPv6 is broken by design^TM).
Why ?
- aW
0n Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 09:47:00PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Andre, I know your dislikes about Cisco, and I share it too. Idea
> of maintaining separate filter lists for each interface is handy, no
> matter that it is like in Cisco. Before writing this mail I have a lot
> o
0n Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 03:16:27AM -0500, James wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 03:03:49PM -0800, Mike Hunter wrote:
> > On Dec 17, "Brooks Davis" wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:22:02PM +0200, Donatas wrote:
> > > > hello,
> > > > i'd like to
0n Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 02:50:09PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>> now a dingo branch, named "dingo". The dingo branch contains
>> all of src, not just sys, as I suspect there are userland bits
>> we'll want to do. I know I'll be doing userland things.
0n Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:34:03PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>DeltaT SEQ-SRTR:SEQ_ENDpacket#
>--
>346853 2856:2920(64)1
>370821 2920:4368(1448) 2
>004410 8712:10160(1448) 6
>007848 12608:1405
Hi all,
I would like to find some network simulation software that is similar but
better than NIST Net [http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/nistnet/].
Can anyone recommend any network simulation software that "is a
general-purpose tool for emulating performance dynamics in IP
networks".
Cheers
- aW
___
0n Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:23:29AM +1030, Brooks Davis wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:14:48AM +1030, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to find some network simulation software that is similar
>but
>> be
esses
are firewalled), but it's also a terrible waste of real IPs.
Can anyone point me if I have incorrect PF config, or PF just work
poorly with gre?
Alex.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
t for natting GRE is creation
of two rules (forward and back) for GRE packet, just like it does for ICMP.
I'm not a firewall writer, but as far as I understand general procedural
programming, it cannot be THAT complicated.
Alex.
___
f
t for natting GRE is creation
of two rules (forward and back) for GRE packet, just like it does for ICMP.
I'm not a firewall writer, but as far as I understand general procedural
programming, it cannot be THAT complicated.
Alex.
___
f
Giovanni P. Tirloni wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
compunction wrote:
GRE needs to pass bidirectional. You will need a binat to make it
work. I have not found a firewall that will allow GRE to work with a
many to one nat.
The most painful thing is that pf's nat works fo
rface (XL710) isn't
>even able to keep up with 2 Gbit/s, never mind 20 Gbit/s. Can anyone
>explain what happened -- was this code simply never integrated, or did
>it get blown away in some later Intel vendor import?
Curious, how are you verify
Hello
Is SO_BINDANY supported in FreeBSD 10.3? If not, do any patches exists?
Alex
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
.ipfw/L8lzLmG05WE
... poke me to write up some documentation. :)
-adrian
On 12 August 2016 at 08:29, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/08/2016 8:00 PM, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello
Is SO_BINDANY supported in FreeBSD 10.3? If not, do any patches exists?
I'm certain that it is, somehow, but I'll
g the promiscuous mode on the ether/vlan interfaces)?
--
Alex Dupre
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Alex Dupre wrote:
> Yes, it seems a bit overkill. I've tried a few other configurations like
> changing the mac address of the vlan interface and enabling promiscuous
> mode on the ether interface, without success.
I solved the issue, I had to enable promiscuous mode on both the
eth
Hi,
My name is Alex Miller and I am from the Database and Lists Management
Company. I wanted to check if you are in practice of purchasing updated
database?
We can help you in reaching C-level decision makers, Business decision
makers, Healthcare Professionals and many more across the Globe
o open a bug report might be here:
https://github.com/kostikbel/rere/issues
--
Alex Dupre
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, C. Stephen Gunn wrote:
> For example, you would no longer simply ``ifconfig xl'', but
> associate a netgraph link-layer node on top of the xl interface,
> and a netgraph interface node on top of the link-layer node, which
> would function (mostly) like xl does now.
Interesting
ergance, and proprietization. Hey, I don't even
> currently run Net/OpenBSD. ;-)
There's nothing that would prevent OpenBSD people from taking netgraph and
implementing it. I run OpenBSD, and threw the idea a few times on their
mailing lists, and response was less than enthus
Actually answer to original question is here:
http://synscan.nss.nu/programs.php
I am not sure if it works on fbsd, last time I looked at it, it had a few
linuxisms hardcoded...
-alex
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Renaud Waldura wrote:
> An amusing trick to populate the ARP table is to ping
global pids, process migration, etc). Their latest version is
for linux, though previous one was for BSD/OS...
-alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
them together.
Depending on your test environment and purposes, netperf throughput
results may be very misleading.
$0.02,
Alex.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
want to compare first
(i.e., decide what your primary metrics are; why you are running these
tests) and only then design the test and choose an appropriate
benchmark.
Alex.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
collisions (or
a packet that its trying to send gets consecutively 'backed-off' too many
times) and decides that interface is borken and it's best to shut it
down ;)
> _ has anything changed in the rl driver after 4.1-RELEASE?
mediaopt half-duplex still doesn't work on rl i
it didn't work right. Maybe 3COM is doing something entirely
> different.
Prolly. FEC is cisco-specific thingy, like ISL...
-alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
me interface?
Thanks a lot,
Alex.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
n
case studies.
Thanks,
Alex.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
posted to this list long time ago) that optimizes the
lookup for incoming packets:
http://polygraph.ircache.net/Tips/FreeBSD-3.3/ip_addr_hash.patch
You are right that an unpatched kernel cannot handle more than ~500
aliases efficiently:
http://www.ircache.net/~wessels/Junk/aliases/
Alex.
To Un
ter building a new kernel
- you forgot to reboot after installing a new kernel
- you built a kernel with a config file different from
the config file you modified.
Alex.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
te2' which does support it, by having
multiple routing tables, and a ruleset that decides which routing table to
use based on packet details.
With policy routing, you indeed will be able to multihome, without any
cooperation of your upstream (assuming strict filters on their ingress
interfaces) an
te: On local network, you'll be essentially having two logical
networks (different IPs, subnet, etc) on the same wire. Its not clean, but
its perfectly supported.
Now, assume you have IPs 11.1.1.* from ISP B, and 11.1.2.* from ISP B. You
configure both IPs to machines on your 'local' n
haring (nameservers for domain are usually
queried randomly) and reliability (if one connection is down, everything
still works, because the other "half" of nameserver is still running and
giving out IPs on the correct interface).
--
--
Alex Pilosov| http://www.acecape.com/dsl
CT
cy) and dynamically routing telnet packets
over the modem connection. Or, traffic engineering: routing packets from a
certain blocks over a certain interface, etc.
-alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
compile on more
than one platform).
Alex.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
chines, some of which I do
> not administer). Could you suggest a better solution?
I'm hacking on a 'magic box' solution, which will essentially listen for
ARP packets from box A to box B, reply with its own MAC, and then forward
ethernet packets back onto the same wire, rewri
box at the far end is doing NAT for
> the machines behind it, too. So we'd get two layers of NAT. Slow.
Not really. When you are not rewriting packets, what's to slow you down?
And by requirements, packets from A to B _do_ have to go through central
site.
-alex
To Unsubscribe:
In cisco terminology, 'tcp intercept' is what the 'ip and tcp reassembly'
part of ipnat does (without port/address rewriting). For example, a router
in the middle which is doing the intercept will have to buffer/reassemble
tcp stream and only forward packets after they are confirmed good.
Example
ase, cc: to my e-mail, 'cos i have not enough time to looking through
all freebsd's maillists.
Thanks in advance!
--
WBR, Alex Markov.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
ding
two sockets to one address (200.47.36.254:1000 in your case) cannot be
allowed because it is unclear which of the two sockets should recieve
packets destined to 200.47.36.254:1000. There may be other reasons.
Alex.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd
g
off load from CPU? Don't hesitate to tell me I'm stupid and this has
nothing to do with TCP/IP :)
Oh, and what's a jumbogram?
Can someone clarify this with one or two sentences to a man with a
negligible Ethernet knowledge?
Thanks!
--
Alex Kapranoff,
clearly states that "The implication of this is that, for correct
operation on 802.3/Ethernet, all devices have to be capable of correctly
handling tagged frames of less than 68 octets in length (C.4.4.3)."
But it still would be nice for it to interoperate with cisco by
implementing
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > But doesn't the switch have to assume that the VLAN will be attached to
> > some non-trunked ports, in which case the packets must be an appropriate
> > length.
>
> The minimum length needs to be enforced at the output interface.
> (A
Hello,
I update the driver to accept IPv6 address.
When I configure interface for both IPv4 and IPv6, everything is good (I
can
ping), but when I'm using only IPv6, the remote machine not replying to my
request.
Is it some configuration problem? Or something else?
Alex
To Unsubs
No, two machine configured back to back.
Do you have any idea?
Thank ypu
Alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
.
Btw, when I set ipv6_forwarding to 1, I was able to ping6.
But more interesting, when I next time boot this machine (ipv6_forwarding
set to 0 by default), I was still able to ping6.
So, what is happened?
Thank you.
Alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-n
Are you running out of ephemeral ports? See net.inet.ip.portrange
sysctl or do your own port management.
Alex.
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Nguyen-Tuong Long Le wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a software that simulates web clients and servers to create
> network congestion (for the purp
quot;man ip".
Alex.
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
> >
> > Are you running out of ephemeral ports? See net.inet.ip.portrange
> > sysctl or do your own port management.
> >
> > Alex.
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Nguyen-Tuong Lon
erned? A public semi-formal commitment
or encouragement from FreeBSD core group may be in order to raise
support from the community. Otherwise, folks may worry that these big
changes, once implemented, will get stuck in the commit queue forever.
Thanks,
Alex.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL P
never sufficient, of course.
Disclaimer: I beat the crap out of machines for a living. This
probably makes me biased (but Terry is probably biased the other way
around since it is "his" box that is being beaten). This also makes me
exposed to real-world cases where beating has been very us
Multiple reasons:
a) MAC addresses can be spoofed. (and are only 48 bit long). Session ID is
64 bit.
b) A real reason is that you can have multiple PPPoE sessions to different
ISPs from same MAC addr.m
-alex
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Tony Williams wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a questi
xy test through the
networking gear (a baseline experiment testing hubs/switches for
bottlenecks), and I want to test "transparent proxies" (clients think
they send requests directly to servers).
Thank you,
Alex.
P.S. So far, all attempts to make this work have failed. Even jail
environ
to the proxy), their transparent
(aka TCP hijacking) proxies (does not work because client packets are
addressed to servers and do not leave the appliance), and their
networking gear (does not work for the same reason).
Thank you,
Alex.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with &qu
rest of our
setup.
Thank you,
Alex.
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have two Ethernet NICs inside a PC. I want TCP/IP packets to
> leave one NIC, go on the wire, and eventually arrive at the other NIC.
> I do not want the kernel to be smart a
.
Good luck,
Alex.
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to filter some kind of traffic - mp3, .avi and so on for the my
> network users. I'd try to find some info on that, but with no success.
> Is there some kind of acl or other rule that can h
ly
find some performance measurements as well or ask on Soekris mailing
list: http://www.soekris.com/
I am not associated with Soekris; we are just happy customers.
Alex.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
box.foo.com
solarisbox.foo.com -> internal GNAT firewall -> otherbox.foo.com
windowsbox.foo.com -> internal GNAT firewall -> otherbox.foo.com
linuxbox.foo.com -> internal GNAT firewall -> otherbox.foo.com
No blocks are seen on the firewall.
Any ideas/pointers/
Mike Silbersack wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Alex Dyas wrote:
>
>
>>The only clue I've managed to find as to what is going on is in a tcpdump
>>of
>>the session (attached). The trigger for the lock up seems to be a
>>messages
>>from the Otherbox ma
getifaddrs(3)
where available (./configure can detect that, of course) and delve
into ioctl() and other OS-specific methods where getifaddrs(3) is not
supported. Stockpile some pain relieve medication first.
$0.02,
Alex.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
C address, not media options, but it
probably does not matter.
HTH,
Alex.
--
| HTTP performance - Web Polygraph benchmark
www.measurement-factory.com | HTTP compliance+ - Co-Advisor test suite
| all of the above - PolyBox appliance
To Unsu
Hello,i have the following problem,compiled yaph-0.91 from ports
(FreeBSD 5.4 with a required libgnugetopt-1.2),the program works for a
while till it I receive Segmentation fault core dumped message.I would be
grateful
for any advice.
___
freebsd-net@f
s I am not subscribed to this list.
Thanks, Alex J Burke.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
3% user, 0.0% nice, 6.4% system, 14.1% interrupt, 78.2%
idle
Mem: 87M Active, 673M Inact, 195M Wired, 33M Cache, 111M Buf, 8324K Free
Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free
top shows quite little load on system.
Alex.
(FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE)
___
freebsd-
Tobias P. Santos wrote:
Hello!
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to set up FreeBSD-based router, and got troubles with
bandwidth limiting. My queues drops lots of packets.
[23:38] gw:~ # ipfw pipe 200 config bw 30mbit/s queue 100
You should use 30Mbit/s (with capital M).
I hope someone can help.
Alex.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello!
mpd (fresh) on FreeBSD 6.1p12 sometimes hangs system, totally, to reset.
Tried two completely different boxes, so it cannot be a hardware problem.
I'm updating to 6.2 now, but have little hope. What can I turn on in
kernel to fix it or at least to make computer reboot?
Richard Tector wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
mpd (fresh) on FreeBSD 6.1p12 sometimes hangs system, totally, to
reset. Tried two completely different boxes, so it cannot be a
hardware problem.
I'm updating to 6.2 now, but have little hope. What can I turn on in
kernel to fix
Richard Tector wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Richard Tector wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
mpd (fresh) on FreeBSD 6.1p12 sometimes hangs system, totally, to
reset. Tried two completely different boxes, so it cannot be a
hardware problem.
Which version of mpd are you using? Have you tried
Max Laier wrote:
[ Removing -stable from CC ]
On Monday 19 February 2007 15:57, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
mpd (fresh) on FreeBSD 6.1p12 sometimes hangs system, totally, to
reset. Tried two completely different boxes, so it cannot be a hardware
problem.
I'm updating to 6.2 now, but have l
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Alex Povolotsky пишет:
mpd (fresh) on FreeBSD 6.1p12 sometimes hangs system, totally, to
reset. Tried two completely different boxes, so it cannot be a
hardware problem.
It's easy to reproduce? Can you try make debug-friendly kernel?
RELATIVELY easy. It happens
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 11:35 AM 2/20/2007, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Thanks a lot, I've added invariants and witness; if it won't yield
any information, I'll try more.
So far, this cursed thing is working with some load for 2 hours,
that's much. It does NOT, surely NOT try
Hello!
Is there anybody here who can say "I'm running mpd with 400 pptp
connections, and it works without a flaw"?
I mean 400 ACTIVE connections.
If yes, I'll ask lots of questions. If no, I'll have to look for other
pptp server. Cannot affor
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Is there anybody here who can say "I'm running mpd with 400 pptp
connections, and it works without a flaw"?
I am running >100 mpd servers, and they work without a flaw.
I mean 400 ACTIVE connections.
And I have >10k PPPoE
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hmm... May I ask you to show your dmesg, kernel config and mpd
configs? I have heard several rumors about system lockup with mpd.
I have heard only one and that person answered me that problem was
solved by avoiding of routing loop, when tunnel
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
And, again, please show me your mpd.conf
Attached.
Thanks a lot; watchdog is armed, WITNESS and INVARIANTS on, running...
Alex.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
And, again, please show me your mpd.conf
Attached.
Thanks, it seems to be more or less stable; however, throughput is quite
little, lots of packets lost and "No buffer space available" on attempt
to ping VPN addresses (only VPN i
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Thanks, it seems to be more or less stable; however, throughput is
quite little, lots of packets lost and "No buffer space available" on
attempt to ping VPN addresses (only VPN is affected).
Have you tried to disable PPTP windowing in
7;ll look at average uptime. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1, mpd 4.1
Alex.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
nat, no dialonemand; disabling tcpmssfix will most likely
render system useless, I'll disable all compression and encryption today
and look.
Alex.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-n
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
After disabling windowing and setting net.graph's, mpd4 refuses to work
and no ng interfaces ever created
lowering both tunables to 128000 solved the problem, will look more.
Oops! I have missed
kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=1048576
, which is req
Hello!
Does anyone have any positive experience with Intel WiFi adapter on
Lenovo R60 with FreeBSD 6.X?
Native driver or ndis, does not matter.
Alex.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To
Max Laier wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007 07:38, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Does anyone have any positive experience with Intel WiFi adapter on
Lenovo R60 with FreeBSD 6.X?
That would be the 3945abg part, right? In that case you want the driver
from here: http://www.clearchain.com/wiki
dresses" limit(?), and the man page does
not seem to mention it. Will getifaddrs() fail if there are more than
12 aliases? If yes, anybody care to explain why?
Thank you,
Alex.
--
| HTTP performance - Web Polygraph benchmark
www.measurement-factory.com |
anyone have an better ideas? Is there currently any plans to update the
network stack to handle this properly?
Thanks,
Alex Hoff
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
the desired behavior of a multicast(and broadcast) pkt traveling
through a bridge? Change it to count it going in *and* out? Or is there some
reason, that I dont know about, for the current stat counting heuristics?
Thanks,
Alex Hoff
___
[EMAIL
To: Alex Hoff
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Multicast stats and bridging
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:03:12PM -0500, Alex Hoff wrote:
> What is the desired behavior of a multicast(and broadcast) pkt traveling
> through a bridge? Change it to count it going in *and* out?
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> Versions: Racoon(8) from ports racoon-20030826a. FreeBSD kernel
> 4.8-RELEASE-p13. Running with net.key.prefered_oldsa=1, but flipping
> to 0 does not seem to make a difference.
I've never quite seen the point of this option; surely using the old SA
ju
ale updated this revision to Diff 32487.
ale added a comment.
The updated patch fixes the reported issue on multiple PADO replies after the
session has been already established.
REPOSITORY
rS FreeBSD src repository
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9270?vs=27059&id=3
ale added a comment.
I'd like to see this in the next 11.2-RELEASE. @eugen_grosbein.net can you
please commit it and MFH?
REPOSITORY
rS FreeBSD src repository
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9270
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreference
ale created this revision.
ale added reviewers: network, julian.
ale added subscribers: freebsd-net-list, mandree.
ale set the repository for this revision to rS FreeBSD src repository.
Herald added a subscriber: imp.
Herald added a reviewer: manpages.
REVISION SUMMARY
Add support for user-suppl
ale updated this revision to Diff 24314.
ale added a comment.
This revision now requires review to proceed.
Fixed typos and improved man page.
REPOSITORY
rS FreeBSD src repository
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9270?vs=24264&id=24314
REVISION DETAIL
https://revi
ale marked 2 inline comments as done.
REPOSITORY
rS FreeBSD src repository
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9270
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: ale, #network, #manpages, julian
Cc: mandree, imp, freebsd-net-list
_
ale retitled this revision from "Add support for user-supplied Host-Uniq tag in
Netgraph PPPoE" to "Add support for user-supplied Host-Uniq tag and handle PADM
messages in Netgraph PPPoE".
ale updated the summary for this revision.
ale updated the test plan for this revision.
ale added a subscrib
ale added a comment.
Thanks for your comment, I'll improve the man page.
INLINE COMMENTS
> wblock wrote in ng_pppoe.4:108
> "host uniq" should be capitalized or otherwise identified with markup. Since
> it's used below, just be consistent and say `Host-Uniq`.
Are you fine with lower case "
ale updated this revision to Diff 25977.
ale added a comment.
This revision now requires review to proceed.
Man page improvements
REPOSITORY
rS FreeBSD src repository
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9270?vs=25849&id=25977
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.o
ale marked 14 inline comments as done.
REPOSITORY
rS FreeBSD src repository
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9270
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: ale, julian, #manpages, mav, #network, adrian
Cc: wblock, mav, poolroom_gmail.co
ale added a comment.
This revision now requires review to proceed.
Who is going to commit it in the src tree and merge in 11 branch?
REPOSITORY
rS FreeBSD src repository
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9270
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/email
101 - 200 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
