Re: FreeVRRPD problem

2004-06-27 Thread Sebastien Petit
Hi Bruno, Perhaps rls interfaces doesn't support monitored circuits. Try to add this option : monitoredcircuits = no If this does not work, try to set useVMAC to no and sendgratuitousarp to yes. Regards, Sebastien. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Bruno Afonso" <[EMAIL PR

Re: FreeVRRPd project status

2005-04-29 Thread Sebastien Petit
Hello markus, FreeVRRPd project is not dead, it's just a hosting problem, server that host www and cvs will be probably available tonight, I have found a new free hosting. I tried to send a patch for freebsd ports end 2004 for FreeVRRPd 0.8.8 without success, probably a resolving problem from m

SIOCGIFMEDIA problems

2005-05-13 Thread Sebastien Petit
Hi -net hackers, A little question about SIOCGIFMEDIA ioctl: Somebody reports me that some interfaces (bge / em but anothers perhaps) seem to discard packet(s) during SIOCGIFMEDIA ioctl, Is it true and why ? Regards, Sebastien. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: SIOCGIFMEDIA problems

2005-05-13 Thread Sebastien Petit
On Fri, 13 May 2005 08:33:32 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At Fri, 13 May 2005 11:10:13 +0200, > Sebastien Petit wrote: > > > > Hi -net hackers, > > > > A little question about SIOCGIFMEDIA ioctl: > > > > Somebody reports me that some interfaces (

Re: SIOCGIFMEDIA problems

2005-05-16 Thread Sebastien Petit
On Mon, 16 May 2005 11:43:09 +0200 Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 07:17:05PM +0200, Sebastien Petit wrote: > > [...] > > as a side note, you may wish to use the kqueue(2) framework to watch > at link stat c

perhaps an updating local route problem when you delete an IPv4 alias

2001-03-07 Thread Sebastien Petit
at ifconfig must delete this route if it exist ? PS: problem does not appear when host A don't try to communicate with his IPv4 alias. Cheers. -- Sebastien Petit [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

New network projects for FreeBSD

2001-12-02 Thread Sebastien Petit
and a man page. Is there a possibility to implement this patch (based on Luigi Rizzo ipfw code) on the FreeBSD /usr/src/sys tree ? you can download the distro at : http://conan.lip6.fr/~spe/download/ethfw-1.1-freebsd-4.4.tar.gz Regards, Sebastien Petit -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send

Ethernet Firewall for FreeBSD-4.4

2001-12-03 Thread Sebastien Petit
/src/sys tree ? you can download the distro at : http://conan.lip6.fr/~spe/download/ethfw-1.1-freebsd-4.4.tar.gz There is a Load Balancer with divert sockets too (don't work yet with SSL and UDP) and a VRRP daemon on this url too. Regards, Sebastien Petit -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubs

Re: Ethernet Firewall for FreeBSD-4.4

2001-12-03 Thread Sebastien Petit
On Monday 03 December 2001 21:28, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > Sebastien, > this is a personal point of view, and I know that people think > differently, but I believe it would be a lot more interesting if > you would design ethfw as an add-on for ipfw as opposed to a separate > thing. Not only it would r

Re: Ethernet Firewall for FreeBSD-4.4

2001-12-12 Thread Sebastien Petit
nd dummynet. I would be spending > way too much money on test gear if I didn't have these) Yes, you're right. On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:06:35PM +0100, Sebastien Petit wrote: > On Monday 03 December 2001 21:28, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > Sebastien, > > this is a personal

Timeouts on dynamic ipfw rules

2002-01-25 Thread Sebastien Petit
Hi,   Is there a way to set per keep-state rule timeout ? I want to have a little ack timeout for connection to mysql  database tcp 3306 but a long ack timeout for other rules. if not perhaps this syntax can be implemented on ipfw code, for example: ipfw add ... keepstate setup timeout-ack

Re: HUT Project

2002-04-03 Thread Sebastien Petit
On Wednesday 03 April 2002 03:09, Crist J. Clark wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 06:52:26PM -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote: > > Correct. The master and backup settings and/will override the RFC. Can > > anyone suggest a few ways that this could all be improved at the kernel > > level? > > I think i

Re: HUT Project

2002-04-03 Thread Sebastien Petit
- Original Message - From: "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sebastien Petit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Scott Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Barney Wolff'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Se

Re: HUT Project

2002-04-04 Thread Sebastien Petit
On Thursday 04 April 2002 09:53, Crist J. Clark wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 09:12:40AM +0200, Sebastien Petit wrote: > [snip] > > > with the RFC2338, FreeBSD must respond to ARP query on 10.0.1.1 and > > 172.16.2.1 with 00:00:5E:01:01 MAC address and not with the real

Netgraph question

2002-04-09 Thread Sebastien Petit
Hi,   Actually I rewrote loadd (a load balancing daemon) for running with netgraph. In the original version, loadd use Divert sockets with ipfw for taking incoming/outgoing traffic. What node I must use for doing the same thing ? I try to use ng_ether but if I do that, People that run pppoe

Re: Netgraph question

2002-04-09 Thread Sebastien Petit
HOOKNAME, buf, bytesread); } } } Thanks, Sebastien. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sebastien Petit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:35

Re: Netgraph question

2002-04-09 Thread Sebastien Petit
> Sebastien Petit writes: > > Actually I rewrote loadd (a load balancing daemon) for running with netgraph. In the original version, loadd use Divert sockets with ipfw for taking incoming/outgoing traffic. > > What node I must use for doing the same thing ? > > I try to use

Re: Netgraph question

2002-04-09 Thread Sebastien Petit
On Tuesday 09 April 2002 22:29, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Sebastien Petit wrote: > > Ok julian, > > > > So I must write loadd with ng_ether for the moment and wait for ng_etf > > include in FreeBSD 4.x. > > I can modify my code after if ng_etf

Re: Netgraph question

2002-04-09 Thread Sebastien Petit
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 00:42, Lars Eggert wrote: > Sebastien Petit wrote: > > With tcpdump I see bad cksum 0!, so I think I must recompute ip checksum > > before resending the packet. > > The xl interface offloads checksumming to the NIC now, which is why you > see

Re: Netgraph question

2002-04-09 Thread Sebastien Petit
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 01:01, you wrote: > Sebastien Petit wrote: > > And I apologize for my duplicate thread about this... > > None needed - I wasn't trying to imply that the thread back then was > about the netgraph issue you described and you had missed it (it was

Problem using ng_ether

2002-06-14 Thread Sebastien Petit
Hi, I've a problem with ng_ether and xl0 driver, when I connect upper <-> lower directly, packets have ip sum to 0 and a wrong tcp and udp cksum. I try to use my test code on rl0 driver, and it work fine. Julian or Archie, can you say me if I must recompute ip/tcp/udp checksum for all packets

Re: Problem using ng_ether

2002-06-15 Thread Sebastien Petit
I'm using actually FreeBSD-4.5-RELEASE-p5, This kernel doesn't have the patch ? Sebastien. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I guess we need to figure out a way make the activation of > > the netgraph hooks automatically disa

Re: Problem using ng_ether

2002-06-15 Thread Sebastien Petit
Apparently, my kernel contains the fix already: [spe@artik /usr/src/sys/netgraph]$ grep "if_hwassist" ng_ether.c priv->hwassist = ifp->if_hwassist; priv->ifp->if_hwassist = 0; priv->ifp->if_hwassist = priv->hwassist; /* restore h/w csum */ So, Why I've pro

Re: Problem using ng_ether

2002-06-18 Thread Sebastien Petit
On Tuesday 18 June 2002 05:54, you wrote: > In article <001f01c21493$b0612620$010110ac@SPEWIN>, > > Sebastien Petit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Apparently, my kernel contains the fix already: > > [spe@artik /usr/src/sys/netgraph]$ grep "if_hwassist"

Re: vrrp problems

2003-07-06 Thread Sebastien Petit
Hi, As I can see on your configuration, you must uncomment the line #[VRID] of the second section if you want to activate the second vrid. I think that it's the problem. Freevrrpd is in development for the moment so you must use the last revision of it (0.8.7 actually). Regards, Sebastien. --

Re: vrrp problems

2003-07-06 Thread Sebastien Petit
Thank you, Regards, Sebastien. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Monday 07 July 2003 05:36, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > ** Reply to note from Sebastien Petit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 6 Jul > 2003 21:07:49 +0200 > > > As I can see on your configuration, you must uncomment the line #[VR

IPSec and setsockopt MULTICAST_IF interaction

2004-03-21 Thread Sebastien Petit
Hi Team, I want to use IPsec engine with AH Security Association and SPD on multicast destination adress. When I comment the setsockopt MULTICAST_IF option, all work fine and destination packets to the multicast adress have AH added before IP Header. But when I use the setsockopt MULTICAST_IF,

SOCK_RAW sockets and IPPROTO_AH

2004-04-05 Thread Sebastien Petit
Hi, Is there a way to receive AH packets in userland with a SOCK_RAW socket ? ie: socket(AF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_AH) ? I found that this socket call doesn't work under FreeBSD. On OpenBSD, it works but a recvfrom/read doesn't return any AH packets when it was received on an interface. Is ther

Re: SOCK_RAW sockets and IPPROTO_AH

2004-04-06 Thread Sebastien Petit
r on the kernel. What are you think about it ? Regards, Sebastien. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeVRRPd project http://www.b0l.org/ - Original Message - From: )> To: "Sebastien Petit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April

Re: freevrrp problem

2004-05-12 Thread Sebastien Petit
Hi Tom, There is a problem with freevrrpd and em drivers. em driver go down,wait 2 seconds, and become up again when an SIOCIFLLADDR is used. So a flapping problem will appear. The last revision in CVS resolve this problem and a new parameter called carrier_timeout (see the man with the new revisi