Ragnar Lönn wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@PC ---++--- port 1
--- Access unit port 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@PC ---+---VLAN SWITCH +--- port 2 --- Access unit
port 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@PC ---++--- port 3
--- Access unit port 3
That came out a b
Hello all,
Does anyone know if virtual network stack support (as implemented at
http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/vimage/) is on the roadmap for future FreeBSD
releases?
Regards,
/Ragnar
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Julian Elischer wrote:
Ragnar Lonn wrote:
Hello all,
Does anyone know if virtual network stack support (as implemented at
http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/vimage/) is on the roadmap for future
FreeBSD releases?
that depends on who you are talking to :-)
the problems are not with the concept of virtual
Hi,
I have a couple of D-link gigabit-ethernet cards that I'd like to run on
FreeBSD 4.11
but it seems the driver only exists for FreeBSD 5.x.
I saw that a certain Barry Bouwsma (who happens to be an old
acquaintance of mine),
had made an attempt at porting the re(4) driver to FreeBSD 4 but I do
.aspx?series=16&Software=True
Regards, John Mok
Ragnar Lonn wrote:
Hi,
I have a couple of D-link gigabit-ethernet cards that I'd like to run
on FreeBSD 4.11
but it seems the driver only exists for FreeBSD 5.x.
I saw that a certain Barry Bouwsma (who happens to be an old
acquai
Hello,
I've been using vimage on FreeBSD 4.11 along with Netgraph to setup a system
that simulates many physical client machines for the purpose of testing
broadband
Internet access hardware. I have hundreds of vimages, each with its own
ngeth0
network interface connected via Netgraph to a real
Julian Elischer wrote:
Ragnar Lonn wrote:
Hello,
I've been using vimage on FreeBSD 4.11 along with Netgraph to setup a
system
that simulates many physical client machines for the purpose of
testing broadband
Internet access hardware. I have hundreds of vimages, each with its
own n
Julian Elischer wrote:
Being able to remove interfaces would be really great. Then I could
create extra logging interfaces in each vimage and not worry about
the cleanup nightmare afterwards. Right now, I have a lot of script
code just to find and reuse old ngeth interfaces sitting around in the
Yet another complex question regarding vimage/netgraph :-)
I'm trying to use the ppp program to do PPPoE on an ngeth interface
without much
luck. I'm using the following Netgraph tree setup:
upper---link0
[fxp0] [ng_bridge] link2---ds [ng_vlan] vlan101--- ether
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lee S Clark wrote:
- dhclient's interactions with either em(4) or some part of vlan(4) is flakey
at best. occasionally all 3 vlan interfaces will obtain an IP, in other
instances there is no traffic placed on the wire at all. typically one vlan
int will get an IP the other two will not. i
This is in 5.x, right? I can't find this code in 4.11 at least.
Does that mean that ngeth VLAN support is broken in 5.x (without the patch)?
Regards,
/Ragnar
Yuriy N. Shkandybin wrote:
I've invistigated that m_head mbuf doesn't have M_VLANTAG when
performing VLAN_OUTPUT()
next diff for /u
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 02:37:41PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 02:41:05PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
As our ifconfig(8) is growing more options for special interface
types, inconsistencies sneak into their syntax. In particular,
-vlandev takes a
Ceri Davies wrote:
I only call it "wrong" as it didn't agree with Archie's article or my
expectations, hence the quotes - I realise that it's subjective.
It just seems to me that packets leaving left2right would go to right,
as the name implies. I don't really mind either way, it's simply that
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Ragnar Lonn wrote this message on Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 18:58 +0200:
Ceri Davies wrote:
I only call it "wrong" as it didn't agree with Archie's article or my
expectations, hence the quotes - I realise that it's subjective.
It just
Hi all,
I've run into the above problem with Netgraph on a FreeBSD 4.11 system.
I know there
are sysctl's (net.graph.recvspace and net.graph.maxdgram) you can set in
5.x but how
can I get around this problem on a 4.x machine where these sysctl
variables dont exist?
Regards,
/Ragnar
_
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:52:49AM +0200, Ragnar Lonn wrote:
Hi all,
I've run into the above problem with Netgraph on a FreeBSD 4.11 system.
I know there
are sysctl's (net.graph.recvspace and net.graph.maxdgram) you can set in
5.x but how
can I get a
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Although the memory overhead is not noticable on modern i386 and amd64
PCs I don't think that we should waste so much memory. We should keep
in mind the existence of embedded architectures with little memory.
In most cases people use 10 - 30 VLANs. I suggest to use a hash,
Hi all,
Running FreeBSD 4.11, we have noticed that some operations done on one
physical
network interface seems to cause packet drops on other interfaces on the
system.
For example, starting a dhclient process on interface em0 will cause a
few packets to
get dropped on the active interface e
I don't know what tcp.inflight does but I know that this type of application
protocol, that expects a reply before sending the next piece of data, will
always be completely dependent upon roundtrip times for its throughput -
the roundtrip time for the exchange "transmit-reply" will limit the
possi
Ivan Voras wrote:
I understand this bottleneck, and know (at least in theory :) ) how it
could be solved, but my problems are not directly related to that:
- For small (but consistent in size) packet sizes, I get randomly
varying round-trip times, and much lower packets-per-second ratio then
Julian Elischer wrote:
I'm looking at a problem where I want onemachine to really look like 2.
this means I want to have 2 separate routing tables if possible.
I know I could do it with eas if I could user Marco Zec's vimage patches
but I need to have a path forward to 6.x and beyond
An answer
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Why do you need two routing tables? Do you run different routing daemons
in the jails? Do you have different default gateways for the jails? Just
trying to understand your requirements and usage of this feature.
Well, I can tell you about our requirements, if you'r
22 matches
Mail list logo
