Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
I have raised the queue lenght a lot, up to 40960, and the behavior
was the same. Ill keep trying and let you know if any success.
No queue depth is going to help you if you receive more data than you
can process.
Pete
I couldn't get Apache 2.2 ab to work on 7.0 at all. The ab from 2.0
worked fine...
Pete
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Paulo Fragoso wrote:
Hi,
We was using one machine with FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE running
apache-worker-2.2.3 + mysql, this server can answer high request from
one client using ab:
On Dec 25, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
In any case it should re-read the kernel table only every 10 minutes
and in the mean time monitor the routing socket to update its copy
of the table. If of course someone is doing a lot of updates on
Why does it have to re-read the tabl
Hi,
What is the preferred way of getting out of an accept in an
multithreaded application? On linux it works that the in-kernel
filedescriptor is closed from the signal handler but that does not seem
to do the trick in FreeBSD 7.1 or 7.2. Is using poll the only option or
preferred anyway?
How about routing domain or forwarding domain?
Pete
Julian Elischer wrote:
So, I'm playing with some multiple routing table support..
the first version is a minimal impact version with very limited
functionality.
It's done that way so I can put it in RELENG_6/7 without breaking ABIs
(I hope
Julian Elischer wrote:
Petri Helenius wrote:
How about routing domain or forwarding domain?
which shortens too
rdom / rd ?
fd would be quite overloaded acronym.
vrf would work for me too. Quite accepted industry term.
Pete
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Any chance the recent root zone changes would make it to 7.0?
Pete
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Pardon the basic question, but is the current patchset "zero copy" or
"one copy"? The paper I saw a link to described a mechanism to eliminate
one of the two copies the traditional bpf approach makes but I haven't
taken a look into the actual code.
Pete
_
ming fu wrote:
Is there a suggestion on how to trigger the watchdog to be called. It
is really time consuming to diagnose this as it takes hours or dates
for the em to lockup once.
Some vendors are kind enough to sell motherboards broken enough for em
to never get interrupts. However the current
ming fu wrote:
Does this one replace the em driver?
It does not. However as far as I understand the semantics of the chips
aren´t that much different so I wonder why another driver instead of
adding to em.
Pete
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http:
James wrote:
uRPF should not emit an ICMP when it drops a -reject route. Even with
ip unreachables, Cisco won't emit ICMP when uRPF is killing a packet. The source
that triggered uRPF drop condition cannot be trusted as it may have spoofed the
packet.
Where would the ICMP go anyway because you
Colin Alston wrote:
What exactly is the point/benefit of such a change?
On related note, it would be nice if the OS bundled dhclient would
report OS version like it does on Windows and Linux. Would make some
operations easier.
Pete
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Andre Oppermann wrote:
BTW: You may be better off using pfil_hooks instead of netgraph for your
tool. You'll save one m_copym and m_freem for each packet.
Is pfil zero copy or one copy by default? If the driver supports it,
does a packet get directly DMA'd in mbufs and passed over the pf which
Pavel V.Zheltobryukhov wrote:
I send Ctrl+C and boot process was continued. But network card doesn't
work. I check cable - it's good. I can't send any ping packet to other
computers. I tried other transmit modes - I switch NIC to 10Mbit half
duplex and 10Mbit full duplex via ifconfig options. No
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Here is a non-critical patch to bring em(4) into line with other
drivers, by using the sysctl tree created for each device by the
bus framework.
Does anyone here have an idea why some platforms (like Thinkpad X31 or
i875 Supermicros) have trouble rebooting with 5.3-BETA w
Kalin Hristov wrote:
It would be very nice
As they say about the MPLS "The feature of the Internet"
Did they change the acronym from "Mostly Pointless Lamp Switching"?
Pete
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
Garrett Wollman wrote:
< said:
Yes, something in that direction, plus: protocols:
IPv4, IPv6, TCP, UDP, ICMP, IPX, etc.
Just about everything as modules.
It is not generally regarded as a good idea to make artificial
boundaries between (e.g.) IP and TCP.
However from the success of the O
Pawel Malachowski wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask people using mpd about performance on particular hardware
setups. I am interested in the numbers of sessions (probably PPTP with weak
encryption) and total bandwith, that can be achieved with, e.g.:
. 300MHz CPU,
. 1GHz CPU,
. 2GHz CPU.
Althoug
Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone working on a port of OpenBGPd, or current version of Quagga
(0.97.3)?
openbgpd compiles fairly painlessly on 5.3. Making it work on 5.2.1 was
definetly more work.
Pete
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists
Alexey Zelkin wrote:
Why not ? Having small and reliable kernel http server able to handle static
content only and limited functionality, would be useful in many cases.
Why?
Pete
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
Julian Elischer wrote:
Petri Helenius wrote:
Alexey Zelkin wrote:
Why not ? Having small and reliable kernel http server able to
handle static
content only and limited functionality, would be useful in many cases.
Why?
able to run without a filesystem, while in single user mode?
Didn&#
Julian Elischer wrote:
if anyone has any ideas on this, let me know :-)
regards julian
p.s. would this be generally useful (assuming it can be achieve without
any overhead when compiled out)?
I would like to fetch the tcpcb contents to userland over an ioctl or so
and additionally have some netst
Danny Braniss wrote:
with tags enabled, iSCSI is much faster, but it also causes a deadlock :-(
this is what i run:
newfs -U /
cd /
restore rf /home/file.dump
What are you using / what's recommended as iSCSI server?
Pete
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Is there a way to send packets from userland process to a specific altq
defined queue?
Pete
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Does somebody have the programming specs for the em chips? Despite of
multiple contacts and promises Intel has been unable to produce them.
Pete
Chris Tracy wrote:
Hi,
I have been attempting to get iperf to generate a line-rate TCP flow
(~989Mbps) across a GigE link but can only get a maximum of
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 05:14:52PM +0200, Lars Erik Gullerud wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It's dead, I think: Cisco's lawyers started making predatory noises
about their "intellectual property".
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:22:48PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Did this recently change since looking at /etc/protocols it does not
seem to be the case for most of them anyway?
Most new protocols come from either some company, DARPA
Is there a way to configure multiple IPv6 address aliases without
knowing the prefix in advance and just specifying the lower 64 bits on
the ifconfig_ lines on rc.conf?
Pete
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
JINMEI Tatuya / çæéå wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:20:07 +0300,
Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Is there a way to configure multiple IPv6 address aliases without
knowing the prefix in advance and just specifying the lower 64 bits on
the ifconfig_ lines on r
Aziz Kezzou wrote:
Hi all,
I worked a bit with netgraph nodes and I find them very amazing and
powerfull... Since my netgraph experience is still quite limited (
they are out of the scope of my project actually) I would like to know
if the following claim is true, I need to be sure because it is
Mike Tancsa wrote:
I like this idea as well, but you need to control how the routes would
come back after the interface comes back up ? This seems more of the
province of a routing daemon like quagga as opposed to a kernel
feature no ?
The connected interface should try to transmit packet
Steve Shorter wrote:
Howdy!
I was wondering how come the listed media types supported
by sk(4) and em(4) is only 1000BaseSX. Even for single mode
1000BaseLX NICs such as sk 9841 and Intel PWLA8490LX, ifconfig
show the media type as 1000BaseSX. Though the NIC appears to operate in
single
Does libthr work on amd64 in RELENG_6?
Pete
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Benjamin Rosenblum wrote:
the em driver in itself is extremly buggy. many people, myself
included, are hitting some major problems with this driver that are
causeing some serious issues. i cant transfer any large files to my
server because the em driver panics and drops the connection for 15
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
I'd be interested in finding out the specific chips with which people are
(not) having success. As em(4) supports an entire family of products,
rather than a single chip, it may be that some chips have quirks or other
gotchas the driver needs to address. It certainly woul
Erik Trulsson wrote:
>
> Just be aware that getifaddrs(3) (which does seem to be a quite useful
> function) is not very portable.
> It appears to be available on recent releases of all the *BSDs, but it
> does not seem to exist on Solaris or Linux.
>
What would be the portable alternative to get
What is the (preferred) way to figure out how much data is waiting
on the receive buffer on a socket? I'm running largish >1M
receive buffers and would like to log a warning message if the
buffers ever get used near-full.
Pete
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
I played around adjusting udp socket buffers for a while and noticed
that if the input buffer is set to a value, packets start getting dropped
when npkt*MTU > SO_RCVBUF so if a socket receives 100 byte packets over
an ethernet interface of 1500 byte MTU and receive buffer of 100k the packets
star
(I'm sending a copy here since I'm running this on FreeBSD and got
no reply so far from the tcpdump folks)
Function pcap_open_live in pcap-bpf.c contains the code snippet below.
To me, this does not make too much sense, because:
- if v is too big to be accommodated (either by configuration or
> 32k is already a bump up from the default of 4k, which at the time that
> was set (and hard coded) probably seemed "good enough". Obviously as
> interfaces have gotten faster, that number has become out of date. Yes
> they SHOULD make it pcap-user tunable, the comment even says so, but until
>
Is there a reason why SO_TIMESTAMP does not work with TCP sockets
but only with RAW and UDP ?
Pete
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> > Is there a reason why SO_TIMESTAMP does not work with TCP sockets
> > but only with RAW and UDP ?
>
> Because it doesn't really make sense?
But it would. It would let me know how long it took the process to get to the
data
I´m currently reading from the socket. (and notify operator to buy mor
My processes writing to SOCK_DGRAM sockets are getting ENOBUFS
while netstat -s counter under the heading of "ip" is incrementing:
7565828 output packets dropped due to no bufs, etc.
but netstat -m shows:
> netstat -m
579/1440/131072 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
578 mbufs all
>
> What rate are you sending these packets at? A standard interface queue
> length is 50 packets, you get ENOBUFS when it's full.
>
This might explain the phenomenan. (packets are going out bursty, with average
hovering at ~500Mbps:ish) I recomplied kernel with IFQ_MAXLEN of 5000
but there seems
>
> Probably means that your outgoing interface queue is filling up.
> ENOBUFS is the only way the kernel has to tell you ``slow down!''.
>
How much should I be able to send to two em interfaces on one
66/64 PCI ?
Pete
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
>
> how large are the packets and how fast is the box ?
Packets go out at an average size of 1024 bytes. The box is dual
P4 Xeon 2400/400 so I think it should qualify as "fast" ? I disabled
hyperthreading to figure out if it was causing problems. I seem to
be able to send packets at a rate in the
> The 900Mbps are similar to what I see here on similar hardware.
What kind of receive performance do you observe? I haven´t got that
far yet.
>
> For your two-interface setup, are the 600Mbps aggregate send rate on
> both interfaces, or do you see 600Mbps per interface? In the latter
600Mbps pe
-
From: "Jim McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Luigi Rizzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Petri Helenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lars Eggert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: RE: ENOBU
>
> just reading the source code, yes, it appears that the card has
> support for delayed rx/tx interrupts -- see RIDV and TIDV definitions
> and usage in sys/dev/em/* . I don't know in what units are the values
> (28 and 128, respectively), but it does appear that tx interrupts are
> delayed a bit
work would be useful here. That would lead to incorrect
timestamps
on the packets, though?
Pete
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@;FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Luigi Rizzo
> > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:56 A
Brian Candler wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:26:50AM -0800, kamal kc wrote:
i modified the bridge.c file and added a routine to
compress/decompress
ip packet. i put my code in bdg_forward(). And ran the
pc in bridge mode.
The modified kernel is deployed in network where the
datarate is
Robert Watson wrote:
I tend to agree, but implemented full queueing support for if_em to
make sure I understood to complexity implications of completely
removing queueing from the ifnet side dispatch. I guess an
interesting question for us is how we decide what the right threshold
is to imp
Increase sendspace an recvspace depending which way your data is going:
net.inet.tcp.sendspace: 57344
net.inet.tcp.recvspace: 256000
TCP window scaling is enabled by default nowadays if I remember correctly.
Pete
Morgan wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying som file transfers across the globe. The RTT is a
> In special cases, the error induced by having interrupts blocked
> causes errors which are much larger than polling alone.
Which conditions block interrupts for longer than, say, a millisecond?
Disk errors / wakeups? Anything occurring in "normal" conditions?
Pete
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Are you sure that this is not caused by spanning tree delay on the ethernet
switch you are probably connected to?
Pete
- Original Message -
From: "Romain Kang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:00 PM
Subject: post-ifconfig delay causes ntpdate
> Whatever the cause, is there some method better than the ping loop
> to determine if IP is actually getting out?
>
Look at the lights on the switch or the card.
Or put an analyzer on the wire.
We use fxp´s extensively and have never seen this.
Pete
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
>
> Less :-) Let me tell you tomorrow, don't have the numbers here right now.
I seem to get about 5-6 packets on an interrupt. Is this tunable? At
50kpps the card generates 10k interrupts a second. Sending generates
way less. This is about 300Mbps so with the average packet size of
750 there shoul
It does not matter if you send using the other link as long as you send
all packets
for the same stream over the same link to avoid reordering. So yes, it does
interoperate.
Pete
Don Bowman wrote:
Examining the source code to ng_fec, in ng_fec_output(), it uses the
IP address to form the hash
The forwarding table points to the channel, not a specific interface on
the channel.
This also allows adding and dropping links on the fly.
Pete
Don Bowman wrote:
From: Petri Helenius [mailto:pete@;he.iki.fi]
It does not matter if you send using the other link as long
as you send
all
I believe the select operation on bpf is not functioning as supposed to.
I´m calling select with 100ms timeout. The bpf interface is listening to
an interface with constant packet rate, so it´s certain that multiple packets
have been received during the select call. However the fd for the bpf
devi
Looking at the numbers, the messages about mbufs being exhausted
do not make sense. Is this a known bug?
Pete
All mbuf clusters exhausted, please see tuning(7).
All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7).
All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7).
> netstat -m
4296/4352/65536 mbufs in use (curren
ate mode on your bpf fd,
> if you want a return before the buffer is full.
>
Immediate mode practically causes the reader to be waken up for every packet,
ending up with huge number of small reads which is highly ineffective.
Pete
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 12:12:26AM +0200, Petri Helenius
ng_ether can be used to capture packets below the ip layer and
not pass them along to upper layers. Additionally you can write
outbound packets to the node.
Pete
- Original Message -
From: "shubha mr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:21 PM
> How about to call ioctl(fd, BIOCSRTIMEOUT, &timeval) ?
> I think select(2) sets the fd for the bpf if the bpf buffer is full,
> or if the bpf buffer is not empty after timed out.
>
This worked for me, thanks. I must have missed it on the documentation
for some reason.
Pete
To Unsubscribe: sen
Just for the sake of it, I tried if the performance of em would be
different
under -CURRENT and it is. Initially when I had:
optionsINVARIANTS #Enable calls of extra sanity
checking
optionsINVARIANT_SUPPORT #Extra sanity checks of internal
structures, required
I seem to get kmem_map too small panics when using large buffers with
bpf. Is there a tunable I should be increasing?
Pete
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I seem to get kmem_map too small panics when using large buffers with
bpf. Is there a tunable I should be increasing?
Yes, increase KVA_PAGES in your kernel config.
I put in KVA_PAGES=1024
with following resu
>
> Read LINT (or NOTES) carefully. You can't set KVA_PAGES to 1024,
> because then your kernel would take up the entire 4 GB virtual
> address space. Since the kernel must fit into 4 GB alongside
> every user process, that leaves you no room for programs. Try a
> more reasonable value like 512
> > With about 150M in use and KVA_PAGES undefined in config (default),
> > both 4.7-STABLE and 5.0-CURRENT panic (1G installed memory).
>
> Yes, the default is 256, IIRC. That corresponds to 1 GB of KVA,
> and you have only 1 GB of physical memory to back it. I take it
> this is a very busy mach
I think the same applies for promiscuous mode, if the interface undergoes
configuration changes while it's in promiscuous mode and the hardware
gets reinitialized it "forgets" about being in that mode. This happens
at least with em.
Pete
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
[Bcc to re@ because it would be good t
David Schultz wrote:
Most kernel memory is not pageable, so swap probably won't help
you. Your `kmem_map too small' error message should report to you
the size of the attempted allocation and the size of kmem_map.
If the map really isn't full, I'm not sure why you would get this
panic, unless yo
Suggestions what would it take to make libpcap included in the FreeBSD
distribution
stop tweaking BPF buffer size by default?
tcpdump.org people have been nonresponsive about changing it there, so I
would suggest
it should be patched in FreeBSD to allow applications to control buffer
size.
Pe
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:25:42PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
Suggestions what would it take to make libpcap included in the FreeBSD
distribution
stop tweaking BPF buffer size by default?
tcpdump.org people have been nonresponsive about changing it there, so I
Guy Helmer wrote:
I use "sysctl debug.dbf_bufsize=131072" on my appliances to increase the
BPF buffer size to something more reasonable without having to directly
modify libpcap.
Hope you're not disappointed to find out that modifying that parameter has
no effect when using applications
This is 4.7-STABLE built on 15 Jan.
I have a nonblocking socket where connect is called. Due to timers also running
in the same process, that eventually returns EINTR. However it seems that
the socket is connected regardless since calling connect again will return
EISCONN.
This seems to be the "
> On the other hand the NetBSD folks don't see it as dead weight
> and systems that may need to talk with core routers that use
> IS-IS end up on other platforms.
>
> Perhaps this is why Arbor uses NetBSD.
>
It should be noted that hardly anything qualifies as "dead weight" on operating
system t
Any ideas if netgraph code is accounted for the "swiN: net" kernel process
or to the interrupt virtual process?
Also ideas what is the usual bottleneck in SMP Xeon system are appreciated,
600Mbps internet traffic seems to generate about 60% (on one of the CPUs) .
This is on -CURRENT.
The numbe
>
> i have yet to see a cisco ios image supporting ipv6 that was usable
> in production environment. and i have tried hard.
This is getting OT but on the subject of repelling users, they´re probably
trying hard to repel their users to the vendor J boxen.
>
> but i will admit to not having seen ap
> > Any comments on the high cpu consumption of mb_free? Or any other places
> > where I should look to improve performance?
>
> What do you mean "high cpu consumption?" The common case of mb_free()
> is this:
According to profiling mb_free takes 18.9% of all time consumed in kernel and is
al
I did some profiling on -CURRENT from a few days back, and I think I haven´t
figured the new tunables out or the code is not doing what it´s supposed to
or I´m asking more than it is supposed to do but it seems that mb_free
is being quite wasteful...
Any pointers to how the new high/low watermark
>
> Yes, it's normal. The commit log clearly states that the new
> watermarks do nothing for now. I have a patch that changes that but I
> haven't committed it yet because I left for vacation last Sunday and I
> only returned early this Monday. Since then, I've been too busy to
> cle
M. Warner Losh wrote:
ISA support is not obsolete. All new PCs still have ISA busses. They
might not have ISA Expansion Bus Slots, but they all[*] still connect
their serial ports, parallel ports, and mouse/keyboard ports via ISA.
Not to mention i8254 which gets to be major pain if ACPI would
I haven't looked that deep into why, but em is quite slow on coming up
compared to
fxp for example. Probably something to do with hardware re-initialization.
Pete
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:57:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a known issue with al
>
> Well, I don't see the problem.
>
> My math says that that's .03% collision rate, which is so deep in the
> noise as to be practically zero. What do you _think_ it should be?
>
Even Mr. Inventor of the ethernet himself regrets calling them collisions because
that term has a bad ring people u
>Changing both sides to full-duplex removes to collisions.
>However: Changing only one side _always_ results in packet-loss!
It´s only when both sides transmit at once. Which is not always.
It happens almost always though.
Pete
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] m
How do I compile/load ipfw kld so that it has "default to accept" which seems to be
required to allow hostnames to be used in firewall configuration loaded at boot time.
Even starting the firewall config with 65000 allow all from any to any
does not seem to allow hostname resolution to work when
>
> You are strongly advised to use IP addresses instead of hostnames in firewall
> rulesets, to avoid DNS spoofing attacks subverting your firewall. Ideally, your
> firewall should function without depending on any external network resources.
>
I know that, I control the domains and additiona
>
> If your firewall needs to perform *any* DNS queries, what happens if the DNS
> server(s) are down or unreachable when the firewall tries to restart? Does it
> fail in a way that you are happy with?
>
That´s an another defect in ipfw client utility, it stops processing rules if
it fails to look
There...
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=i386/52835
Pete
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Petri Helenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, M
Is there planned support for the 82597EX (10 GbE) chipset and if there is a plan,
is that incremental development on the em driver or completely separate piece of
code? At least the linux driver seems to be separate, although the chip semantics
seem very similar of the later 8254X (1 GbE) chips.
Are you aware of the work done in various forums to address this?
For one of the more recent presentations look at
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0306/ward.html
Pete
- Original Message -
From: "Evgeny Dolgopiat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" <[EMAIL
Most common acronym would be Digital Video Broadcasting,
a set of standards defining audio, video, text, teletext, data, etc.
encoding, modulation, encapsulation, etc. over Satellite, Cable
or Terrestial medium.
Only reason why I have a linux-box is to run DVB-S stuff.
Not sure what it would take
r is designed according to the OST
specification so applications like vdr, dvbstream, etc. would work
out of the box.
Pete
> Eugene Vedistchev
>
> Petri Helenius wrote:
> > Most common acronym would be Digital Video Broadcasting,
> > a set of standards defining audio,
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
How could the scheduler decide when to drain the queue ?
It should move packets from zero-bw WFQ pipe the interface FIFO
as soon as possible but should consider weights
(100 packets from one queue then 1 from another and so on).
That would no
Charlie & wrote:
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 08:09, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:18:06PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
E> Does FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE keep per-interface summary for received
E> unicast octets? More precisely, I need to know number of unicast
E> octets received by my
>
> how come no-one knows about netgraph.. the framework designed to do
> exactly this? :-)
> It's only been in use for 6 years..
>
We do this and a lot more with netgraph and love the architechture,
thanks goes for the people who did the architechture.
So this qualifies as "somebody knows" :)
>
> Is anyone working on a driver for the Intel 10Ge card (I think they're
> the only one actually shipping...)? I was looking to give one a try on
> something other than linux :)
>
Since intel provided the 1Ge driver, I would suspect them to come up with
the 10Ge one. The 10Ge part does not se
I´ve seen lost interrupts with 5.1 with em driver and the ata driver seems to suffer
from this also when doing detach/attach. Getting a old kernel module from 5.0 and
recompiling
it for 5.1 does not help with the issue so I suspect a more generic issue with
interrupts.
Pete
- Original Mess
>
> This would add additional delays to the code path for both ingress
> and egress. In a world where gigabit ethernet is becoming the norm,
> every nanosecond counts. I don't think the benefits of your proposal
> would justify the performance loss. At the very least, I'd want the
> extra calls
ipfw seems to have developed a bug lately on 5-CURRENT;
# ipfw add 2042 allow tcp from 0.0.0.0/0 to me
42
02042 allow tcp from me to me dst-port 42
It used to work that 0.0.0.0/0 was "any" instead of "me". Last I checked
the notation is also widely used in netwo
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
