I haven't looked that deep into why, but em is quite slow on coming up compared to
fxp for example. Probably something to do with hardware re-initialization.
Pete
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:57:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,Yes, I can reproduce this too, no gratuitous ARP is sent.
Is there a known issue with alias IPs on em interfaces not sending out
gratuitous arps ?
The situation is as follows: I am running a custom redundancy daemon that migrates the IP address of a server from one interface to another in case the active network path fails. Till now I was experimenting with two fxp interfaces and everything worked perfectly. i.e. when the ip address moved over (using a perl script to run ifconfig commands) it sent out grat. arps for each of its alias IPs. This allowed the router to update its Arp table and talk to the newly active interface.
Now when I try running the code with em (gigabit Ethernet over copper) NICs, I simply do not see the gratuitous arps come out of the new interface.
I am at a loss to understand what has changed. Could it be that the line DOWN -> UP time of the em interface is longer thereby causing a loss of ARPs ? Any suggestions ?
Cheers,
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
