On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:01:46 -0500
mgrooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone currently looking at the IPsec NAT-T patches? I posted a similar
> question several months ago around the FAST_IPSEC + IPv6 integration time
> frame. Maybe now that things have settled a bit, this work can be reviewe
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:18:31 -0700
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paolo Pisati wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:02:29PM +0300, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> >> While I have not done extensive testing, preliminary tests are encouraging
> >> and it seems to work, so I thought I'd anno
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:13:00 -0800
Freddie Cash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On December 4, 2008 11:58 pm Antonio Tommasi wrote:
> > Hi to all,
> > i want to install a virtual machine on my FreeBSD 7.0 box. Can you tell
> > me which is the better sofware to do this?
Antonio,
you would have receive
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:34:11 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.meijome.net/files/freebsd/test_hk_dl/fbsd_NL_test_from_au.cap
> the same file, which I uploaded to a FBSD in NL (as mentioned above). Ping
> time
> is about 320 ms to this box from home
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 02:21:13 +0800
Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for reply.
>
> Nicolas Gieczewski wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 May 2007 22:06:39 +0800, Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Recently, I have leased a rack in Asianetcom and some bandwidth.
> >> However, the speed for m
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:06:16 +0100
Joe Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kern.ipc.nmbclusters
FWIW, this one in particular ( controls mbuf clusters) will made a huge
difference back in the FBSD 4 days on very heavily used websites. I've had them
tuned up to the order of almost 100K - over that
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:10:22 +0900
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please let myself of bz@ know of any issues. I'm attempting a build
> of a fresh tree now.
Great , thanks for all the time and effort invested :)
One question, is NAT Traversal supported now on -STABLE without the patches
that are f
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:58:05 + (UTC)
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Norberto Meijome wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:10:22 +0900
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Please let myself of bz@ know of an
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:28:15 + (UTC)
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Norberto Meijome wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:58:05 + (UTC)
> > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:31:05 +0200
VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://vanhu.free.fr/FreeBSD/patch-natt-freebsd6-.diff
> applies to STABLE, and currently does not needs update. It may apply
> to -CURRENT, but won't compile cleanly.
great, thanks Yvan , will try soon.
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:34:55 +0800
blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the main enhancement for the commit?
Hi Susan,
please check the archives of net@ for several emails discussing this.
>
> Tracing back the discussion, It is all about NAT-T?
no, I only just brought this up.
>
> How is
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:07:37 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Eric L. Anderson wrote:
>
> > What is the limit of NFS mounts a FreeBSD server can make and how do you
> > modify this limit?
> >
> > The only reference I could find to this question on th
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:47:28 +0900
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A very slightly off topic question for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does anyone know of
> a
> web site that collects and indexes canonical packet traces for network
> protocols? I'm looking for a good storehouse of traces to use in
> testing.
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Weiguang Shi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> moat.nlanr.org has a huge collection of traces, with dst and src IP addresses
> anonymized.
>
?! it seems someone hijacked nlanr.org's domain :
Domain ID:D128379310-LROR
Domain Name:NLANR.ORG
Created On:06-Sep-2
hi all,
is there any already existing Netgraph node that would allow me to replace
bytes in the data part of a packet? I'm talking about generic "foo" for "BAR"
replacement, though different lengths would be good too.
or maybe other tool can do this too?
thanks!
B
_
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:54:43 +0300
Alexander Motin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > is there any already existing Netgraph node that would allow me to replace
> > bytes in the data part of a packet? I'm talking about generic
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:19:47 +0300
"Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ports/netsed + pf/ipf (for transparent proxying)
>Of course, the overhead is big.
great, thanks , that may do - i may only need it for a proof of concept at this
time.
cheers,
B
_
{Beto|N
Hello everyone, I need your help / insight here :)
My setup, 2 VMs, XP (WinXP) and BSD (FreeBSD 6.2)
[XP ,172.16.82.81 ] --- [172.16.82.81,em1 BSD A.B.C.D,em0] --- The Interweb
[Other_servers_galore]
A.B.C.D is a public IP.
[Other_servers_galore] represents all and any servers XP wants
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:33:53 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:27:29PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
>
> > rdr on $int_if proto tcp from 172.16.82.81 to any -> 127.0.0.1 port 10101
> > netsed tcp 10101 0 0 s/FOO/BAR
>
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:33:53 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> b) Instead of replacing the destination address in pf with rdr, try
> leaving it as it is, but use route-to (lo0) to get the packet routed to
> the loopback interface. This would require netsed to listen on
> INADDR_A
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:27:29 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone, I need your help / insight here :)
Mel (fbsd.questions at rachie.is-a-geek.net ) has very kindly and cleverly
provided a neat solution for this problem. It was posted to Question@, and i
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:54:49 -0400
Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Honestly, FreeBSD routing code is pretty poor as far as a modern router
> goes. If you throw enough CPU at it you can brute force your way through
> plenty of things, but in the context of modern commercial rou
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:10:06 -0700
"Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ever run into a non-existent 'olive'?
Hi Kevin,
I dont understand :)
> Or even a J series Juniper?
> Juniper put together a very impressive software based routing system
> that is FreeBSD based.
Yes, I know of this,
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:32:22 -0600
Brett Glass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This company hasn't been using a RADIUS server. They have an Active
> Directory server (yuck!), but I don't know if it would be useful
> for this purpose.
As much as it's a MS solution, why reinvent the wheel / kill you
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 23:32:37 +0200
Guido van Rooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps a bit off-topic, but I'm looking for a cheap vlan switch.
> Anyone with a suggestion?
the Netgear GS724T is a 'web smart' ( :D ) 24 port gigabit switch. about 600
AUD from memory. you can find cheaper ones if y
Hi all,
My setup :
--
FreeBSD hostname 4.10-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.10-PRERELEASE #2: Wed Apr 28
09:40:43 EST 2004
fxp0 : link to the outside world
fxp1 : link to LAN
fxp2 : link to DMZ
ipf firewall
ipnat for LAN and rdr for services.
--
I'm running tcpmssd to fix MSS:
/usr/local/bin/tcpmssd -p 100
26 matches
Mail list logo
