On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:33:53 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> b) Instead of replacing the destination address in pf with rdr, try
> leaving it as it is, but use route-to (lo0) to get the packet routed to
> the loopback interface. This would require netsed to listen on
> INADDR_ANY (or use a raw socket, I haven't checked its source code).
Hi Daniel,
I tried this but i only managed to lock up the BSD VM a couple of times (not
even console access, so it was not just network affected). I am not sure if
i've done this correctly ..
pass in on $int_if route-to 127.0.0.1 proto tcp from 172.16.82.81 to O.P.Q.R
tag ROUTED keep state
is that ok ? ( tried also doing route-to 127.0.0.1 $external_addr with no
visible change.) I have logging enabled specifically on lo0 , but i dont see
any packets going through.
I am not entirely sure how netsed will pick up this packets. I've had netsed
listening on *:{port} and 127.0.0.1:{port} and it obviously didnt make any
difference. Could you point me to any reference / sample of what you mean?
thx again,
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
I used to hate weddings; all the Grandmas would poke me and
say, "You're next sonny!" They stopped doing that when i
started to do it to them at funerals.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
