abled by hardware switch
But when i press the button nothing change, no options in the bios too.
Have you an idea where the problem come from ?
Thanks in adavance,
Nicolas.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
Hi Bernhard,
Thanks for your response,
Yes i have a status indicator, the led for the wifi is always orange, i
think if it's work that the led become white.
I try to load/unload a few times but nothing changes, always the same
message !
Another idea ?
Nicolas.
I have no clue.. D
Hi,
I'm also interested.
If you have a patch, I can test it, I have a 5100 card.
Thanks in advance,
Niko.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsu
Hi,
I have a cable modem with dynamic IP, and a FreeBSD 5.3 server just
behind. This server gets its IP with the help of dhclient.
Today I got a huge down because of a problem on the ISP side. During
that time, dhclient made his job trying to get a lease every 4 minutes,
unsuccessfully of cours
of VRRP
inside FreeBSD?
I understand that this made sense at a time due to CISCO patents, but
according to Wikipedia, it seems that those patents did expire some
years ago.
So, would there still be legal issues about this or is FreeBSD now free
to have its own VRRP implementation?
Regards,
Nicolas Masse.
: no bundles defined
> mpd: no bundles defined
> mpd: no bundles defined
> mpd: no bundles defined
> mpd: no bundles defined
> mpd: no bundles defined
> mpd: no bundles defined
--
Nicolas Gieczewski
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, 31 May 2007 22:06:39 +0800, Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recently, I have leased a rack in Asianetcom and some bandwidth.
> However, the speed for my curcuit is substantially slower than my
> provider's company site.
> [...]
> *This server is using FreeBSD 6.2 patch 4 with Apache in
0.008790 TCP 2049
> 799 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=49232 Len=0 TSV=613133118 TSER=4294753266
MSS=1460 WS=0
38 0.008836 TCP 799
> 2049 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=5840 Len=0 TSV=4294753266 TSER=613133118
Thanks,
--
Nicolas
___
Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>>> Our FreeBSD 4.10 NFS server has some problems serving files by NFS
>>> on TCP (no problem with UDP) when the Linux (2.6) or Solar
ow to make that thing work it will be a
great help.
P.S. I try that solution, if there's other who work better, please tell
me .
thanks
Nicolas Beauchesne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
exits.
I that a bad idea? Should I only protect some portions, and why?
Thanks
Nicolas Fritsch
Software Engineer
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
ion period, one could define both an MSIZE and an MBUF_SIZE
equivalent to MSIZE for a couple of versions (say the whole 5.x series),
clearly stating MSIZE is deprecated and shouldn't be used anymore, and
then it could be completely removed in 6.x.
--
Nicolas Christin
Ph.D. Candidate, Universi
;m not that familiar with the code, but I'd be surprised if ICMP
packets were handled by IP functions. (ICMP is not IP.) Not sure where
your checksum problem comes from.
--
Nicolas Christin
Ph.D. Candidate, University of Virginia, Computer Science
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~nicolas
T
(Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 02:33:00PM +0100) jeremie le-hen wrote:
> yoda:tataz# hping -n -I tun0 -V --icmp --dontfrag --icmp-addr 193.252.50.1
> using lo0, addr: 127.0.0.1, MTU: 1500
> HPING 193.252.50.1 (lo0 193.252.50.1): icmp mode set, 28 headers + 0 data bytes
> [send_ip] sendto: Can't assign reque
't think I posted it to this list at the time, it's
more likely I sent a private email to the driver's author. Then again,
these problems occured under 4.3 and 4.5, can't tell if this was fixed
in more recent revisions of the driver.
Best,
--
Nicolas Christin
Ph.D. Candidate, Univ
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Nicolas Christin wrote:
> If there is interest I can try to dig up the old email in which I was
> describing the problem...
Following is a more accurate description of the problem I saw with the
card mentioned in this thread. I don't seem to have a printout of th
Hello,
I would like to know if anyone knows of a port (or a porting project in
progress) of OpenBSD's pf(4) to FreeBSD. I couldn't find anything... (I
know some guy started porting it to NetBSD, but haven't seen anything
FreeBSD-related.)
Best regards,
--
Nicolas
To Unsubscrib
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1816764+1821123+/usr/local/www/db/text/2003/freebsd-questions/20030413.freebsd-questions
Mike Hogsett and Cejka Rudolf seems to have found also this problem.
So I wounder if there is a solution to this problem ?
Thanks,
Nicolas Ross
d the length or
interval of the pauses themselves.
Does anyone happen to know what could be causing this problem?
Cheers,
Nicolas Gieczewski
Nix Software Solutions
http://www.nixsoftware.com/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
in the
KAME tree. See for instance the changelog for July 10 at
<http://orange.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/kame/sys/altq/altq_cbq.c>.
Regards,
--
Nicolas
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubs
connection directly to R1 through the
ti1 interface of R1 it dont work, but when i try to establish a TCP IPv4
connection directly to R1 through the ti0 or ti2 interface of R1 it
work. I can establish from R3 a TCP IPv4 connection directly to R2
through R1.
Do you have an idea how fix the problem
could use this feature to provide port
forwards for a given user, instead of providing it to all users.
While bapt@ thought at first glance that it might be a good idea,
neither of us know whether it would be reasonable to implement.
Any though on this?
Best,
Nicolas
PS: Credit for this idea
ttps://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues
--
Nicolas DEFFAYET
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi all, I want to know the total of bytes in and out of each IP address
assigned as an alias to an bce0 interlace.
if I run netstat -ib I get something like this:
> netstat -ib
NameMtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Idrop
IbytesOpkts Oerrs Obytes Coll
bce0 1500
Here is the output with a better formatting:
http://pastebin.com/arrRsM78
What I would like to understand is why lo1 shows Obytes (incrementing)
while bce0 IP's don't
lo1 is a using NAT
also the sum of lo1 (not including the Hi all, I want to know the total of bytes in and out of each IP addre
Try creating a tap interface and later bridge your VM to that tap.
in your host create a bridge containing re0 and tap0.
regards.
On 04/16/2013 09:31, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm a bit stumped getting a (FreeBSD guest) VM to use bridged networking to
> work. The same VM works fine on
When using bridge mode, use tap interfaces otherwise you will get
problems when using more than one VM.
regards
On 05/08/2013 03:49, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On 2013-05-06 2:49 PM, Norbert Beckmann wrote:
>> To Marc G. Fournier
>>
>> I do not think it's an issue with VirtualBox. I am running Vir
Hi all, I was using NDIS for a (ath0) wifi 3Com
OfficeConnect
Wireless 108Mbps 11g XJACK PC Card under 5.3-stable I
upgraded my src
and hove now 5.4-PRERELEASE but now the card is not
working well, when
I ping to my gateway I get very high response times
and I start to
loose conection. the card ac
28 matches
Mail list logo
