I've noticed a change in behaviour between FreeBSD 4.9 and FreeBSD 5.4
When sending an undirected broadcast to 255.255.255.255, FreeBSD 4.9
encapsulates this with the broadcast MAC address (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) as the
destination.
However, FreeBSD 5.4 encapsulates the packet using the MAC address o
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:16:56PM -0700, shafi kamal wrote:
> I am wishing to implement tcp minimally .I have taken it as a project
> work.
Good for you. That has nothing to do with FreeBSD, of course.
> Is it possible to do that?
Of course it is possible, depending on a suitable d
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:54:02PM +0200, Anton Bester wrote:
> The following is a tcpdump from the secondary when bind is running:
You really want to use tcpdump -n. Otherwise, every packet seen will trigger
a new reverse DNS lookup, which in turn will trigger your nameserver to make
further look
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:35:04AM +0100, Meka[ni] wrote:
> Why doesn't this work:
> openssl s_client -starttls smtp -connect smtp.gmail.com:25
>
> I've tried adding -CApath /usr/local/share/ssl/certs (that's where I keep
> certs), but nothing changed. This is the error I get:
> CONNECTED(
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:17:15PM +0100, Meka[ni] wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:35:29 +
> Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Run tcpdump and/or ktrace to see what's happening.
> >
> > # tcpdump -i nv0 -n -s1500 -X tcp port 25
> >
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:16:51AM +0100, Meka[ni] wrote:
> > > 14:07:04.306017 IP 64.233.183.109.25 > 82.208.205.163.59631: P 82:129(47)
> > > ack 153 win 5720
> > > 0x: 4510 0057 c387 3206 ac3f 40e9 b76d [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 0x0010: 52d0 cda3 0019 e8ef 6674 b5e2 a714 7dc4 R..
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:44:08AM +0100, jan tore wrote:
> Example 1: a clock-file that limits the speed for sending group mail.(we
> bought the most excpencive version)makes us BIG problem.
> a program limit-send-speed file in the group mail program we bought
> is set to 6 thousand per hour ma
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 02:06:28PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> I want to create a bridge-interface (if_bridge) with a bunch (500+) of
> sub-interfaces (vlan) as members. All members of the bridge should be
> able to "talk" to each other but MAC-addresses must be isolated to their
> "own" vlan.
T
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:25:07PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> In all this - our role is similar to an ISP, but we are buying access to
> our customers from an external part. Every customer is delivered on a
> separate vlan trunked.
>
> - Our DSL customers cannot be set on the same VLAN i a sin
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:08:34PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> The point in all this is to reduce administration on my hand and in some
> cases to offer a service to customers with the feeling that they reside
> "on the same layer".
That is, customer A *wants* to see all the Netbios broadcasts f
t invalidate the cache unless the
file has been modified. However that doesn't help much if the cache is going
to get invalidated anyway the next time the file is opened :-)
Many thanks,
Brian Candler.
P.S. I am working to FreeBSD-4.5-STABLE-20020426
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 04:42:48PM -0700, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote:
> > ... Could it safely be made less restrictive, e.g. don't
> > clear the cache when opening a file for read?
>
> In a word, no. Why couldn't the sysadmin be running "make installworld"
> on the NFS server while you're runnin
Thanks for comments so far.
It looks like the best solution for me is going to be to boot diskless into
a ramdisk. It's been quite a job finding out how to do that; there doesn't
seem to be much in the way of documentation.
Reverse-engineering the source suggests that the following methods exist
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:06:03PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> Not a big fan of Linux though. I will have to wait for this to be ported
> to BSD. Anyone with info if this is being done?
...
> > [1] http://www.sjdjweis.com/linux/proxyarp/
You can do proxyarp like that with FreeBSD now. However yo
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:52:03PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> Scenario#1:
> -I have a range of ip's, for example 215.10.10.0 - 215.10.10.255.
> -I want to distrubute theese ip's to my customers via DHCP.
> -They are all atached to me via a VLAN-trunk on a unique VID
> -I have 200+ customers.
>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 05:35:35PM +, Baldur Gislason wrote:
> I've also wanted to have multiple interfaces on the same physical network
> with
> different addresses on the same subnet.
That's a reasonable thing to want to do, and I remember seeing a statement
saying that FreeBSD plans to a
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:52:03PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> > > Scenario#1:
> > > -I have a range of ip's, for example 215.10.10.0 - 215.10.10.255.
> > > -I want to distrubute theese ip's to my customers via DHCP.
> > > -They are all atached to me via a VLAN-trunk on a unique VID
> > > -I
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 01:45:44PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> The reason why I have to proxy-arp mac between VLANs is that one mac
> cannot end up mapped to more than one port in the switches FDB. If they
> do - we get something called "host-flapping" on IOS-language.
Or put it another way - Ci
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:28:37PM -0200, Ricardo A. Reis wrote:
>I insert this route in my workstation for network test,
>
> #route add -net 200.144.xx.xx 255.255.254.0 172.22.x.x
Linux user I bet ;-)
For FreeBSD you need:
#route add -net 200.144.xx.xx -netmask 255.255.254.0 172.22.x.x
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:20:01PM -0200, Ricardo A. Reis wrote:
> But i use route add 200.144.xx.xx/[mask] 172.22.xx.xx for
> many year, and this work perfectly on freebsd and linux.
Yes it does (as of a couple of years ago, I think).
However if you want to specify the netmask ex
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:18:49PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> In this world of P2P apps it would be neat to have a way that two P2P apps
> could attach to each other even though each is through a firewall. Most
> firewalls only allow
> "outgoing" connections.
>
> It would of course be possib
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:46:10PM +0200, asko wrote:
> I'm searching for a better, faster solution..
> Does it exist?
Do your constraints allow you switch to 'pf' instead of 'ipfw'? I think you
may be able to do it that way. I had a similar situation where I wanted
traffic originating from the l
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:43:16AM -0500, Eric W. Bates wrote:
> Dec 9 23:15:33 gertrude kernel: ipfw: 510 Deny TCP
> [::0001]:6010 [::0001]:61310 out via lo0
Note that ::0001 is the IPv6 "localhost" address (equivalent to IPv4
127.0.0.1)
> I was hoping someone smarter than I could point me to
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:26:50AM -0800, kamal kc wrote:
> i modified the bridge.c file and added a routine to
> compress/decompress
> ip packet. i put my code in bdg_forward(). And ran the
> pc in bridge mode.
>
> The modified kernel is deployed in network where the
> datarate is
> about 4 to
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 01:41:50PM +0200, Oleg Tarasov wrote:
> mpd configuration is attached in mpd.conf and mpd.links. Shortly, ng0
> is a PPPoE connection on rl1 interface.
^
Sounds to me like an MTU problem. Windows machine sends a 1500-byte packet,
but it can't fit into an ethernet
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:15:14PM -0600, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> While doing some network stress-tests from a dual-CPU x86 FreeBSD 5.4
> server, I noticed that a "ping -f" drives dhcpd's CPU usage way up. I
> put dhcpd into debug mode and didn't get any error messages. I then ran
> dhcpd with
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 07:56:51PM +0900, Zongsheng Zhang wrote:
> Hi, *,
>
> For testing throughput of a TCP connection, the following topology is used:
> Host-A ---GB Ethernet--- Dummynet ---GB Ethernet--- Host-B
>
> Host-A/B use FreeBSD v6.0. Sysctl parameters of Host-A/B are:
> kern.ipc.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 10:31:48PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> O> I have the latest version of ported mpd (3.18_3) installed and tried
> O> to insert
> O> set iface enable tcpmssfix
> O> but no positive result, but I understand that this option should help
> O> in this situation.
>
> Un
The IPSEC documentation at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ipsec.html is
pretty weird. It suggests that you encapsulate your packets in IP-IP (gif)
encapsulation and THEN encapsulate that again using IPSEC tunnel mode.
e.g. notice where it shows
spdadd W.X.Y.Z/32 A.B
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:08:54AM -0500, Matt Emmerton wrote:
> While correct, note the scenario for which the configuration is describing:
>
> 14.10.3 The Scenario: Two networks, connected to the Internet, to behave as
> one.
>
> This is something I do all the time to connect retail outlets to
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 04:26:43PM +0100, Eric Masson wrote:
> gif/gre tunnels and ipsec transport mode are quite convenient when
> associated with dynamic routing protocols.
OK, I'll buy gif + IPSEC transport mode as an option. [Although in that
case, perhaps what you want is an external IPSEC tu
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 04:04:04PM +0100, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> > This is a really strange approach which is almost guaranteed not to
> > interoperate with other IPSEC gateways.
>
> It's probably for FreeBSD <-> FreeBSD setups, where it might make sense
> to have an interface endpoint
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 05:15:39PM +0100, Eric Masson wrote:
> Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > OK, I'll buy gif + IPSEC transport mode as an option. [Although in that
> > case, perhaps what you want is an external IPSEC tunnel mode implementation
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 05:43:39PM +0100, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
> > Also excellent would be "bump in the wire" bridging, where the gateway
> > negotiates transport-mode security on behalf of clients without their being
> > aware of it, but as far as I know only OpenBSD supports that.
>
> What is
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 06:04:37PM +0100, Eric Masson wrote:
> > Did someone tried such a setup ?
>
> I plan to do so.
>
> Just have to find ios images that support l2tp and ipsec for my 1601R
> or 2611 and bigger flash modules (I've been given them two weeks ago,
> hardware upgrade is the easy p
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 09:50:47AM +0300, Alexey Popov wrote:
> If we would also have NAT-T support, FreeBSD would be the best choice
> of VPN concentrator.
/usr/ports/security/ipsec-tools/pkg-descr says:
"Known issues:
- Non-threaded implementation. Simultaneous key negotiation performance
s
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:35:21PM +0100, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
> > As it happens this FreeBSD box is also acting as a NAT gateway using pf
> > (myhost is on a private IP) and actually its external IP is also private -
> > it sits behind a second NAT firewall. So maybe that's where the problem
>
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:38:15PM +0100, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
> > "Known issues:
> > - Non-threaded implementation. Simultaneous key negotiation performance
> > should be improved."
> >
> > I think that would limit its usefulness as a scalable concentrator, if the
> > comment is still valid
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 09:01:50PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >IMHO we should disable emitting and acting upon ICMP redirects by default.
>
> I know many places that rely on them heavily.. please don't do that..
> Cisco PIX doesn't generate them.. it makes that machine a pain in the
> to
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 02:52:14AM +, Paul wrote:
> I've just installed FreeBSD 6.0 Release yesterday, I've spend the last
> two days trying to resolve a networking problem, the problem is this:
> when I try and connect to a domain or an IP for that matter, it takes
> several minutes for it to
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 12:39:26PM +1030, Aluminium Oxide wrote:
> Below is the output of `diff res_debug.org.c res_debug.c`
>
> I've also attached this.
> =
> 574,575c574,575
> < precsize_aton(strptr)
> < char **strptr;
> ---
> > precsize_
I've done a bit more debugging on the MSS problem I'm having with sl2tps
running with IPSEC transport layer security. The client is Windows XP
out-of-the-box.
Here's what happens:
1. PPP negotiates an MRU of 1400
2. However, ifconfig ng0 shows an MTU of 1376 (where does that come from?)
3. When t
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:59:56PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> I am having trouble to get isc-dhcp-server to start up without a
> subnet-declaration for a local subnet.
Write empty subnet declarations for those subnets.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mai
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:13:32AM +0100, Przemyslaw Szczygielski wrote:
> Well, for me the config is so complex, that I doubt anyone will
> waste time on going into my config files, but, well... There's
> always hope...
A diagram helps lots. Tell me if this is correct:
\|/ - - - - - - - \|/
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 02:30:08PM +0100, Przemyslaw Szczygielski wrote:
> > ipseccmd -f 0=* -t 10.2.0.1 -a PRESHARE:"foo"
> > ipseccmd -f *=0 -t 10.2.0.2 -a PRESHARE:"foo"
> >
>
> XP: (configured by wizard, from MMC):
>
> "InboundIPsec" prot: ANY, src port: ANY, dst port: ANY, src IP:
>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:55:18PM +0100, Przemys?aw Szczygielski wrote:
> Well - both ways work. The one from the wizard and the one by
> ipseccmd. The difference is i don't know how to deactivate ipseccmd
> filters ;-)
ipseccmd -u
> From XP I pinged 10.2.0.1 with IPSEC on
>
> tcpdump -i ndis0
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:49:18PM +0100, Sebastian Schwerdhoefer wrote:
> Short question:
> Is it possible to redirect packets from localhost with "rdr"?
Short answer: yes.
Longer answer: perhaps this is the kind of thing you're looking for.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2005-Sep
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 09:50:47AM +0300, Alexey Popov wrote:
> > If we would also have NAT-T support, FreeBSD would be the best choice
> > of VPN concentrator.
I just saw this patch posted on the ipsec-tools-devel list:
http://ipsec-tools.sf.net/freebsd6-natt.diff
It's for FreeBSD 6 but also
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 11:04:04AM +, Brian Candler wrote:
> I've done a bit more debugging on the MSS problem I'm having with sl2tps
> running with IPSEC transport layer security. The client is Windows XP
> out-of-the-box.
>
> Here's what happens:
>
>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 05:01:50PM +0200, Oleg Tarasov wrote:
> I run FreeBSD 6.0 and I have begun to recieve quite periodic error messages
> like these:
>
> Jan 25 19:45:50 central named[728]: could not listen on UDP socket:
> permission denied
> Jan 25 19:45:50 central named[728]: creating IPv
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 08:39:41AM -0600, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Brian Candler wrote:
> >>1. PPP negotiates an MRU of 1400
> >>2. However, ifconfig ng0 shows an MTU of 1376 (where does that come from?)
> >>3. When the client opens a TCP connection, it offers an
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:39:08AM -0600, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> First of all, let's be clear about terminology.. there are two different
> MRU's negoatiated in opposite directions and those negoations are done
> independently. The problem, which is basically "the FreeBSD->WinXP MTU
> is causing a P
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 06:50:06PM +1030, Aluminium Oxide wrote:
> > Suggestion: use unified diff (diff -u res_debug.org.c res_debug.c). It's
> > *much* easier to read.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Brian.
>
> Thankyou Brian, I've done as you suggested.
>
> Q: How can I edit the new PR title to ref
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 01:01:53PM +0100, Unix-Solutions - Steven wrote:
> Hi you guy's,
>
> I have a little problem with my natd or ipfw configuration.
This may not be what you want to hear, but in my experience if you have a
configuration with multiple external interfaces and multiple NAT insta
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 08:50:00AM +1030, Aluminium Oxide wrote:
> A...
>
> You're right, but there's only a handlful of these that stop buildworld
> with -O3
I think the issue is that although you may be able to get FreeBSD to *build*
using -O3, it's quite unlikely that it will *work* pr
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:51:28AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Tiago Cruz wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 13:19 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>it is definitly possible
> >>but you will have to do some reading
> >>natd can do it.
> >>
> >>
>
> it should be in the natd man
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:42:36PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >And, If I have't not control about the second gateway? Because my client
> >have a notebook, and he can try connect at anyplace, anytime :-(
> >
> >So, I think that is impossible to to... is true?
> >
> >
> no,
> you should be abl
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:33:44PM -0600, Matthew Lineen wrote:
> I'm trying to workout the specifics of NIC/route fail over on FreeBSD
> 6.0 and hoped someone here could point me in the right direction.
>
> We have 2 ServerIron load balancers and each of our application servers
> is plugged int
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 05:35:33PM +0100, GiZmen wrote:
> I would like to use fastforward option on my freebsd 6.0-stable
> box. But i have strange problem with it. My box is a router for LAN
> with IP visible to internet. I am managinc C class network.
> When i turn on fastforward option any of th
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:53:44PM +0100, GiZmen wrote:
> Yes, clients can ping google IPs.
>
> ping 64.233.187.99
> PING 64.233.187.99 (64.233.187.99): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=0 ttl=238 time=155.613 ms
> 64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=152.681 ms
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 06:07:22PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> The situation is as follows:
>
> We have a couple of FreeBSD routers, with RFC1918 addresses on the
> ethernets and a public address on the loopback. This works fine for
> connecting to the routers, but is problematic for locally o
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 03:58:09PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> It seems that NFS locking is broken for the combo of 4.11 or 5.4 server and
> 6.x client. Apps like eclipse and firefox fail to start with my home dir on
> a 4.11 server and a 6.x client.
This in interesting to me - I'll explain
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:57:35AM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote:
> I'm currently planning renovations for the power mains supplying are
> server room. One of the ideas I have is to float the entire room using
> a isolation transformer. The only problem to this solution, that I can
> think of, is th
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:26:40PM +0400, dima wrote:
> 3. Is at least implementation of NFS client (either kernel-side or
> user-space) stable enough for production use? Client OS replacement is
> impossible (hardly suitable, really) in my project.
I built a big mail/web cluster a few years ago u
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:59:50PM +0400, dima wrote:
> > I built a big mail/web cluster a few years ago using FreeBSD 4.x (4.6.2 I
> > think), where all the front-ends used NFS to access data on a shared
> > fileserver platform (NetApp). It worked without a hitch, and still does.
>
> What is the
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 11:27:00AM +0800, fooler wrote:
> >what the heck is synchronous pppoe? we connect to pppoe via ethernet so
> >it is already synchronous (?)
>
> set speed sync
And how does that change the pppoe ethernet frames?
___
freebsd-net@f
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:59:52PM +0800, fooler wrote:
> >>set speed sync
> >
> >And how does that change the pppoe ethernet frames?
>
> nothing change and still the same... ethernet frames are at layer 2 while
> synchronization (either asynchronous or synchronous) is at layer 1...
> synchronou
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 08:02:04AM -0700, Yeow C.H. wrote:
> It is designed to compliment tcpdump, which by itself has done a great
> job
> in capturing network traffic. With Bit-Twist, you can now regenerate the
> captured traffic onto a live network. Packets are generated from save
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 01:14:27PM +0200, Sten Daniel Srsdal wrote:
> hostap should work, ad-hoc should work. by infrastructure you mean that
> the card operates as a 'station'? then it shouldn't work (correctly) as
> defined by the standard. commercial products tend to implement "mac-nat"
I've se
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:55:11PM +0100, William wrote:
> The switch is a Cisco 3550, trunking is setup on the port and I've
> allowed the VLANS I'm interested in using.
>
> The end result is being able to communicate with all devices on said
> VLANS which is fantastic but my next objective is to
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:38:03PM +0530, JOBY THAMPAN wrote:
>
> > Hi all ,
> >
> > I have a setup like this
> >
> > Linux Machine 1
> > Eth0- DHCP Server
> >
> >
> > Linux Machine 2
> > Eth1- Got IP
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:14:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> A few things..
>
> 1/ thisn is a FreeBSD list so we are not very familiar with linux.
> 2/ PPPOE uses PPP which is a point-to-point protocol and does not support
> broadcast.
> 3/ DHCP is a broadcast protocol and does not s
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:38:39AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Would it be possible to improve the behaviour of the TCP protocol
> implementation so that out-of-order reception was acceptable?
Possibly - but if your FreeBSD box is acting as a router, and it re-orders
packets in transit to t
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:47:48AM -0700, Nash Nipples wrote:
>hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
>
> "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
> but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo=smtp.external.co... -Ac -t" just
> wont work:
> WARNING: RunAsUser for MSP ignore
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 06:19:59AM -0700, Nash Nipples wrote:
> Upgrade to exim - *any* mail routing policy you can think of can be
> implemented in exim.
>
>lol thanks! i've read about it and i think its awesome but yet i dont
>know how do i uninstall sendmail?
It's part of the
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 02:52:19PM -0300, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> > > # route add 128.110.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.0.0.17
> > > add net 128.110.0.0: gateway 255.255.0.0
...
> > >Running netstat -nr I get the following:
> > >
> > > 0&0xa11255.255.0.0UGSc 15 332
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 12:38:31PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. Even at 28.8 I am seeing loss with
> the connection dropping and seeing dropped packets (e.g.
> May 19 12:04:43 soekris4801 ppp[3404]: tun0: Phase: 1: HDLC errors ->
> FCS: 1, ADDR: 0, COMD: 0, PROTO: 0)
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:09:23AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> The internal USR seems to correctly see the carrier drop and PPP
> hence sees it. However, the 2 external Intels I am experimenting
> with on the USB serial ports do not.
USB-serial adaptors tend to be very broken, unfortunately. I
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 07:51:33PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to transmit data between host A and host B. The link between
> these two hosts is really bad: PING reports 30% packet loss
How big are the pings? Try
ping -c100 -s1472 x.x.x.x
to send 1500-byte pings (20 bytes IP
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:10:39PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> It looks like its an issue with the USB serial device and or driver.
> Whether the driver or the actual device (or both) not sure. If I put
> the same 2 modems put on 2 regular serial ports, ppp is able to see
> the carrier is down a
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:43:54PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
> I have setup the GRE tunneling and that is working fine doing pings and
> tracerts when I disable ipsec and ipsec-tools, its just the encryption
> side thats the problem.
Ah, I guess this means you're following the instructions in
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:26:44AM -0700, Nash Nipples wrote:
>ipfw add 5 skipto 500 ip from 192.168.110.1 to any out via tun0
> ipfw add 10 skipto 500 ip from any to 192.168.110.1 to any in via tun0
> ipfw add .. skipto 500 ip from 192.168.110... to any out via tun0
> ...
> ipfw add 500 d
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 08:21:51PM +0200, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> > very efficient way of doing this analysis. You can turn the sflow data into
> > simple CSV records using 'sflowtool', or ntop has an sflow module.
>
> Ntop just seems very unreliable and bloated to me, at least after
>
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:39:17PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> I'm working with a client's FreeBSD system (4.9 with patches) which
> is having trouble resolving certain domains but not others. When I
> try to execute the same queries using "dig", I see the error message
>
> res_nsend: Protocol n
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:30:01PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> The manual page says, that rcmd() is only to be used by root's processes.
DESCRIPTION
The rcmd() function is used by the super-user to execute a command on a
remote machine using an authentication scheme based on reserved
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:47:33AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> What I remain upset about, though, is that the rcmdsh(), which is used by
> rcmd() ignores the fd2p parameter making it impossible to capture the
> remote's stderr...
Well, it's probably worth send-pr'ing it.
I'd first test whet
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 06:40:50PM -0400, Ensel Sharon wrote:
> I can't seem to get ipfw to handle a rule like this:
>
>
> ipfw add 00100 count ip from any not { 10.20.0.0/16 or 10.30.0.0/16 } to
> any via em0 in
>
> The error is:
>
> ipfw: missing ``to''
> ipfw: unrecognised option [-1] 10.20.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 01:06:01PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> How hard would it be to make the stock FreeBSD FTP-server to examine the
> first, say, 100Kb of the uploaded file and interrupt transfer if the file is
> of a prohibited or is not of an allowed type?
>
> Anything under 100Kb is f
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 11:13:47AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> I have an application in which I'd like a FreeBSD router to have
> multiple, isolated LANS attached to it, each with the same address
> space. The FreeBSD box would take the place of multiple NAT routers.
>
> For example, I might wan
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 12:38:56PM +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> Can I somehow use lo1 address
> for connections initiated from Host_2?
Options I know of:
(1) the application which originates the connection can explicitly bind
to the lo1 address (see for example telnet -s and ping -S options)
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 04:09:29PM +0200, Marko Zec wrote:
> > There's a project called 'vimage' which adds a separate virtual forwarding
> > table per jail. This might work for you, although all the natd's "outside"
> > interfaces would need to sit on the same interface, and I don't know if it
> >
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 01:40:13PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> an ng_ip node :-)
> I've considerred it.
Then all the tools like 'netstat' and 'route' need modifying to talk to a
netgraph socket, but in principle I don't see why it couldn't be done.
ISTM there are a zillion userland-to-kernel
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:17:37PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> I've been noodling over this for two weeks now, and am thinking
> that the easiest thing to do might be is map every address in each
> "virtual" router to a unique address from FreeBSD's point of view
> (i.e. 192.168.0.2 on LAN 1 bec
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 02:43:22AM +, Alexandre Martins Garcia wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> I have a modem connected to my freebsd machine in ethernet, so to have a
> configuration from my ISP I did:
>
> hydrus[/home/amg]# dhclient fxp0
> DHCPDISCOVER on fxp0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interva
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:43:28PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
> >We use NetApp Filer clusters (NAS) for that purpose.
> >They aren't cheap, but they work very well.
> I don't like blackboxes with nice GUIs. :)
They have a command-line interface too :) Seriously, these are really
excellent devices.
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:44:52PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
> >>I can solve this problem with Linux
> >How?
> With a shared filesystem of course.
Specifically, which one? If there is a good filesystem for this application
perhaps it could be ported.
___
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:20:47AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2006, at 5:30 AM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> >Brian Candler (B.Candler) writes:
> >>So to make an update, you would have to unmount from box 2,
> >>remount RW on
> >>box 1, make the chang
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:59:39AM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote:
> Ofcourse I should do the [1] trick:
>
> I want to do the following; I have three IPsec endpoints
> at this moment, one at home, one in my personal colo environment
> and one in another colo environment.
>
> The machine(s) in the pers
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 03:46:22PM +0200, Morgan wrote:
> I'm trying som file transfers across the globe. The RTT is almost 400ms and
> the transfer rate is painfully slow. There are 24 router hops on the path
> and I assume most of the problem is there
The number of routers isn't an issue, as lon
I have installed FreeBSD-5.2.1 on my brand new Soltek EQ3702A machine, which
has an nVidia chipset. I have got most of the on-board hardware to work:
kldload snd_ich -- pcm
kldload firewire \ to mount my ipod
kldload sbp /
but I don't seem to be able to get ethernet to work. A google s
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
