RE: PPP routing failure

2005-03-18 Thread bob
Check out the install guide at http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php it has the best step by step instructions for using userppp. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter C. Lai Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 8:37 PM To: f

RE: Multiple Interfaces

2003-07-31 Thread Bob
of incoming segments but more load on the system. END >What am I missing? All you are missing is the fact FreeBSD cannot handle two NICs the same subnet. OpenBSD does, NetBSD does and Linux does. Regards Bob D ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

-current dropping ssh connections

2023-06-21 Thread bob prohaska
Are there other things worth looking for? Right now I'm using in /etc/rc.conf the line sshd_flags="-E /var/log/sshd_debug.log" which is already quite verbose. Is there a better option that emphasizes errors over normal traffic? Thanks for reading, bob prohaska

Re: -current dropping ssh connections

2023-06-21 Thread bob prohaska
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:45:25AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > On Jun 21, 2023, at 10:24, bob prohaska wrote: > > > I've got a Pi4 running -current that seems to selectively drop ssh > > connections. > > Only when the ssh has text streaming over it? Even when it

Re: -current dropping ssh connections

2023-06-22 Thread bob prohaska
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:05:18AM +0100, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > bob prohaska wrote: > > > I can't detect any consistent pattern. For a while I thought load on the > > sshd-host end made a difference, but the latest disconnect was on an idle > > system with s

Re: -current dropping ssh connections

2023-06-26 Thread bob prohaska
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:38:50PM +0100, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > bob prohaska wrote: > > > That seems worth a try. > > The notion of an ssh escape (~. in this case) finding its way into the data > > stream is new to me. > > Thinking again, that looks like

Re: -current dropping ssh connections

2023-06-26 Thread bob prohaska
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 07:38:22PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > On Jun 26, 2023, at 19:00, bob prohaska wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:38:50PM +0100, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > >> bob prohaska wrote: > >> > >>> That seems worth a try. >

Re: -current dropping ssh connections

2023-06-27 Thread bob prohaska
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 03:47:26PM +0100, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > bob prohaska wrote: > > > It is tempting to think USB saturation would account > > for the trouble. A tool similar to gstat, but for > > USB as a whole, would be helpful if it exists. > >

Re: Marvell 88E8057

2009-10-26 Thread Bob Johnson
d at their website. http://www.marvell.com/drivers/search.do I think they provide one FreeBSD driver for all of their chipsets. Don't know if it supports the 88E8057. -- -- Bob Johnson fbsdli...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing

Re: Observations from an old timer playing with 64 bit numbers...

2010-06-23 Thread Bob Johnson
ast in 7.2. But it refers you to them under the alias byteorder(9). - Bob -- -- Bob Johnson fbsdli...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to &qu

Re: IPv6 <-> NAT <-> IPv4 ... possible?

2007-10-19 Thread Bob Johnson
you should be able to have as many hosts has you wish behind it on IPv4. > > If possible, pointers to docs to read would be appreciated ... I wish I had them. You just learned most of what I know about IPv6, but I'm working on improving that. - Bob _

Re: Merging rc.d/network_ipv6 into rc.d/netif

2007-11-05 Thread Bob Johnson
ate network configuration knobs from all the other things found in rc.conf, which some might view as an advantage. And this would be a good time to change defaultrouter to default_router! - Bob ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: SLIP slipping away

2008-03-17 Thread Bob Johnson
cify -l, so it might even fit the symptoms you describe. In other words, try slattach -l -s 115200 /dev/cuad0 and see if that helps. If both systems have Ethernet ports it would be easy (easier, I suspect) to set up a two-node network with a cro

portscan looks like.....

2004-08-23 Thread Bob Ababurko
y computer to hack it up? I am pretty scared at this point. Can somone help me? thanks, Bob ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

gateway for separate networks

2004-09-11 Thread Bob Ababurko
defaultrouter in the rc.conf file for the first, do I do the same or do I add routes to tackle this. If someone could show me any resources on the web that deals with this,that would be great. thanks, Bob ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http

RE: gateway for separate networks

2004-09-11 Thread Bob Ababurko
, what is this fancier setup? /bob At 05:01 PM 9/11/2004 -0700, you wrote: Assuming the second nic is used for it's own private subnet, and not a second route to the internet (which would require a much fancier setup ;-) you don't need to do anything except add the interface, configur

Re: gateway for separate networks

2004-09-12 Thread Bob Ababurko
At 01:18 AM 9/12/2004 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote: On Sep 11, 2004, at 9:41 PM, Bob Ababurko wrote: I have two networks that are routed to me via a serial connection, namely a T1. I have just installed a new router and it has two ethernet ports that will route to the two different networks

Re: Looking for networking solution.

2005-06-16 Thread Bob Bishop
ling to pay someone to develop such a solution for FreeBSD. I'd love to get in touch with someone willing to pick up that challenge. If you haven't done so, you might want to look at http://www.scps.org/scps/Reference_S_W/reference_s_w.html and see whether the reference implementation would

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-24 Thread Bob Bishop
-result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. > +result of vote moves the FCP into the `accepted` or `rejected` state. The > +core team MAY make minor edits to the FCP to correct minor mistakes. Core > +MAY return the proposal to the submitter if there are major proble

Re: Impending NATM removal

2017-04-07 Thread Bob Bishop
move on. I don’t have a dog in this fight, but for instance ProSum PROATM-E155 (patm(4)) still appear to be available. See http://www.prosum.net/en/products/atm-adapters > The planned commit can be seen at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9883 > > -- Brooks -

Erratic ping behavior, was Re: Pi3 answers ssh only if outbound ping is running on -current

2022-02-16 Thread bob prohaska
7;t be found, even though it's visible via ls at the OK prompt. Might - be a prohibited or priviledged character to the loader? Names like kernel.20220214 are likewise not recognized, even though they're visible using ls. For lack of immediately better ideas I've started stress2 running in single-user mode to see if anything of interest results. Thanks for reading, and any ideas! bob prohaska

Re: Erratic ping behavior, was Re: Pi3 answers ssh only if outbound ping is running on -current

2022-03-13 Thread bob prohaska
it's possible to ssh into the machine, with a highly variable delay for the password prompt. Unfortunately, new console errors are appeared: bob@pelorus:~ % (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 00 1f ea a3 c0 00 00 40 00 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error (da0:umass

Re: 60+% ping packet loss on Pi3 under -current and stable-13

2022-04-29 Thread bob prohaska
follow simple instructions. If this sounds like a known bug(s) links to bugzilla would be of much interest. Many thanks for reading, and any ideas! If some essential details have been omitted please indicate and I'll try to supply them. bob prohaska

Re: 60+% ping packet loss on Pi3 under -current and stable-13

2022-04-30 Thread bob prohaska
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 08:14:27PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2022-Apr-29, at 19:12, bob prohaska wrote: > > > Since about December of 2021 I've been noticing problems with > > wired network connectivity on a pair of raspberry pi 3 machines > > using wired

Re: 60+% ping packet loss on Pi3 under -current and stable-13

2022-05-01 Thread bob prohaska
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 06:39:57PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: > On Apr 29, 2022, at 7:12 PM, bob prohaska wrote: > > > > Since about December of 2021 I've been noticing problems with > > wired network connectivity on a pair of raspberry pi 3 machines > > using wir

Re: 60+% ping packet loss on Pi3 under -current and stable-13

2022-05-01 Thread bob prohaska
|--50.1.20.24 pelorus.zefox.org Pi3 13.1 usb-serial---50.1.20.28 switch |--50.1.20.25 nemesis.zefox.com Pi4 -current usb-serial---50.1.20.29 |--50.1.20.28 www.zefox.org Pi3 -current usb-serial50.1.20.25 Thanks for your help! bob prohaska

Re: 60+% ping packet loss on Pi3 under -current and stable-13

2022-05-01 Thread bob prohaska
On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 05:10:59PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: [reply at end] > On 2022-May-1, at 16:27, bob prohaska wrote: > > > On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 12:58:45PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >> > >> Looks like there is some problem getting past >

Re: 60+% ping packet loss on Pi3 under -current and stable-13

2022-05-02 Thread bob prohaska
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 08:56:12AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: [reply at end] > On 5/2/22 03:13, bob prohaska wrote: > > On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 05:10:59PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > [reply at end] > > > On 2022-May-1, at 16:27, bob prohaska wrote: > > >

Re: 60+% ping packet loss on Pi3 under -current and stable-13

2022-05-02 Thread bob prohaska
stat for ue0 . > On the same machine one gets: root@www:/home/bob # netstat -i -n ue0 NameMtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs IdropOpkts Oerrs Coll lo0 16384 lo0185 0 0 185 0 0 lo0 - ::1/128 ::1

Re: 60+% ping packet loss on Pi3 under -current and stable-13

2022-05-02 Thread bob prohaska
my observations of keyboard interaction vis ssh. Input sometimes stop echoing for tens of seconds, then all goes through after the pause. Maybe this really has little or nothing to do with the network, it's just that all my interaction with the two machines is via the network. Neither has had a console and keyboard since I got the Pi4. Thanks for bringing your observations to the discussion! bob prohaska

Re: 60+% ping packet loss on Pi3 under -current and stable-13

2022-05-04 Thread bob prohaska
ually sufficed to let inbound ssh connections work. Here's the console: Starting background file system checks in 60 seconds. Wed May 4 08:10:53 PDT FreeBSD/arm64 (pelorus.zefox.org) (ttyu0) login: bob Password: Last login: Tue May 3 09:01:03 from gateway.zefox.net FreeBSD 13.1-STABLE #53

Re: 60+% ping packet loss on Pi3 under -current and stable-13

2022-05-05 Thread bob prohaska
can be used to compare branch revisions by age? Thanks for reading, bob prohaska

Re: Gigabit for FreeBSD

2001-12-10 Thread Bob Willcox
systems (1.533 GHz CPUs vs. 1.2 GHz for the SMC card's CPUs). 3. If I statically link the driver in the kernel it disrupts my sound card. This doesn't happen if I dynamically load the driver. However, all of these are easily ignored or worked around in my environment. Bob On Mon, Dec 1

Re: Gigabit for FreeBSD

2001-12-10 Thread Bob Willcox
this (though the link usually does finally stay up) with both of the SMC cards that I have tried with my Linksys switch. On the other hand, my Linksys card always comes up on the first try with the Linksys switch. Unfortunately, it's also 25% slower than the SMC cards :-( Bob -- Bob Willcox

Unexpected EADDRINUSE

2006-01-03 Thread Bob Halley
s not technically needed. Nevertheless, we don't see why it should fail either :). I looked at the differences between 4.7 and later kernels but didn't manage to figure out how the changes caused this change in behavior. Regards, /Bob _

Re: Unexpected EADDRINUSE

2006-01-03 Thread Bob Halley
Sorry my attachments didn't make it :) # # sink.py # import socket import traceback s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM, 0) s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1) s.bind(('127.0.0.1', 12345)) s.listen(5) while True: try: n = s.accept()[0] d = N

Re: Removal of netns - politically correct version

2003-03-05 Thread Bob Bishop
iosswrel/ps1835/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008007fba7.html He's dead, Jim. -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 977 4017 [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax +44 (0)118 989 4254 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Re: Removal of netns - politically correct version

2003-03-05 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi At 08:53 5/3/03, Terry Lambert wrote: [...] The code is still useful as a simple implementation, much more easily understood by the student than the current TCP/IP stack, for certain. The same is true for netipx (wc -l *.[ch] is almost identical). -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118

RE: rl interface drops out occasionally

2004-02-03 Thread Bob DeBolt
s moved per day). I had the same description of problem. I shut off the onboard NIC and installed a new rl and problem was solved. I spent several weeks testing different things. For the 5 or ten bucks for a new rl card, it is worth spending it. Sincerely Bob DeBolt Pres / CTO Starblanket Resea

Re: IPv6 Ideas

2009-04-24 Thread Bob Van Zant
That's being done as part of the behave working group: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/behave-charter.html If anyone were to begin working on something like this this they'd probably want to think about following that proposal. I too am interested in working on this. Just haven't

Re: IPv6 Ideas

2009-04-24 Thread Bob Van Zant
do DNS over v4 with whatever the DHCP server gave. In a pure-v6 world... In hindsight it's an obvious oversight that it wasn't included in the first place. -Bob ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma

IPv6 duplicate address detection

2009-05-05 Thread Bob Van Zant
ree that the address shouldn't be marked as a duplicate then I have a python script that reproduces the problem and a patch to nd6_nbr.c to attach to a problem report that I'll file. -Bob [1] RFC 2461 section 7.2.6 paragraph 1: In some cases a node may be able to determine that its li

Re: IPv6 duplicate address detection

2009-05-06 Thread Bob Van Zant
es prevent the behavior I was seeing. I guess this makes it extra clear that the multicast packet I'm sending is simply being looped back in. I'm guessing that the next step is for me to file a PR with this information? Or what do you suggest? -Bob ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: IPv6 duplicate address detection

2009-05-06 Thread Bob Van Zant
ful and potentially seems useful to avoid a few seconds of downtime while the network figures things out. -Bob ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: IPv6 duplicate address detection

2009-05-06 Thread Bob Van Zant
that would be a different thread. I guess that changes my question quite a bit. If you randomly fire off an unsolicited NA right after configuring an interface should that cause a DAD failure? -Bob On 5/6/09 4:55 PM, "JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉" wrote: > At Wed, 06 May 2009 15:49:45

Re: IPv6 duplicate address detection

2009-05-06 Thread Bob Van Zant
ut and clearing this up for me. -Bob On 5/6/09 10:47 PM, "JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉" wrote: > At Wed, 06 May 2009 17:17:52 -0700, > Bob Van Zant wrote: > >> I guess that changes my question quite a bit. If you randomly fire off an >> unsolicited NA right after configur

Debugging a netgraph node

2009-06-16 Thread Bob Van Zant
ning after I call NG_FWD_NEW_DATA? If I got ng_tee wired in would it's tap hooks show me what I want? A better way to try to tee the data? Thanks, Bob ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

IPv6 traffic between two hosts not flowing

2009-07-23 Thread Bob Van Zant
that go nowhere and pulling interfaces in and out of promiscuous mode (tcpdump) the system appears to deadlock. I don't have any proof that it's deadlock other than a completely unresponsive box that needs to have the power cable removed. It

Re: IPv6 traffic between two hosts not flowing

2009-07-28 Thread Bob Van Zant
rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 e...@pci7:8:0:class=0x02 card=0x016d1028 chip=0x10768086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 e...@pci9:4:0:class=0x02 card=0x10028086 chip=0x10268086 rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 em2 was the only device functioning properly on 6.2. -Bob On 7/23/09 9:32 PM, "Julian Elischer"

Re: kern/116837: ifconfig tunX destroy: panic

2008-01-06 Thread Bob Van Zant
The following reply was made to PR kern/116837; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bob Van Zant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: kern/116837: ifconfig tunX destroy: panic Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:46:09 +0530 My FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE box has been running int

Re: kern/116837: [tun] [panic] [patch] ifconfig tunX destroy: panic

2008-01-23 Thread Bob Van Zant
The following reply was made to PR kern/116837; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bob Van Zant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Subject: Re: kern/116837: [tun] [panic] [patch] ifconfig tunX destroy: panic Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:40:19 +0530 I applied the patch

Re: kern/116837: [tun] [panic] [patch] ifconfig tunX destroy: panic

2008-02-04 Thread Bob Van Zant
The following reply was made to PR kern/116837; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bob Van Zant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Subject: Re: kern/116837: [tun] [panic] [patch] ifconfig tunX destroy: panic Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:04:08 +0530 I've been runni

PIM IPv4 user-level process

2004-01-30 Thread Bob Van Valzah
ng obvious? Thanks, Bob ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process

2004-01-30 Thread Bob Van Valzah
set, but I could probably make something work if the amount of patching required is more modest. Where would I find the sources to get started porting/patching? Thanks, Bob On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 10:45, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:43:12AM -0600, Bob Van

Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process

2004-01-30 Thread Bob Van Valzah
per--nearly 1 GB required to build. Bob ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"