> On 16 Jun 2022, at 21:48, Mike Jakubik
> wrote:
>
> After multiple tests and tweaks i believe the issue is not with the HW or
> Numa related (Infinity fabric should do around 32GB) but rather with FreeBSD
> TCP/IP stack. It's like it cant figure itself out properly for the speed that
> t
> On 31 Aug 2022, at 10:11, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Am 31.08.2022 um 11:00 schrieb Peter Jeremy :
>>
>> On 2022-Aug-31 10:18:44 +0200, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
>>> I am looking for a mechanism to get a notification from the OS when, for
>>> instance, an IP address on an in
> On 27 Aug 2022, at 15:48, Michael Pounov wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> I want to propose one new feature about IPFW. FWSync driver exchange dynamic
> state and aliase records between routers.
> If you have interest about such feature to be implemented at FreeBSD code
> base. You are fill free
Hello list!
Today more and more NICs are capable of splitting traffic to different
Rx/TX rings permitting OS to dispatch this traffic on different CPU
cores. However, there are some problems that arises from using multi-nic
(or even singe multi-port NIC) configurations:
Typical (OS) question
On 05.02.2013 18:44, h bagade wrote:
Hi all,
I applied patch on em driver code and I want to check how it is working on
different situations. I need to put some output in different parts of the
code to trace what's going on in different situations.
I've tried to write to files or executing comma
On 19.02.2013 14:49, Jan Markus wrote:
> Hello,
Hello.
>
> our Ministry of the interior now requires that IP traffic logs must
> contain MAC addresses of our clients. I am trying to fulfil this with
> Netflow v9 which (allegedly) should contain the MAC addresses of IP flows.
Netflow version 9 is
On 20.02.2013 02:05, Vijay Singh wrote:
Hi, this patch gives a modest performance improvement here @work.
Please consider.
[/u/vijay/bsd/CODE/cur/sys/net]# svn diff if_ethersubr.c
Index: if_ethersubr.c
===
--- if_ethersubr.c (r
Hello list!
There is a known long-lived issue with interface routes addition/deletion:
ifconfig iface inet 1.2.3.4/24 can fail if given prefix is already in
kernel route table (for example, advertised by IGP like OSPF).
Interface route can be deleted via route(8) or any route socket user
(so
On 07.03.2013 11:39, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 07.03.2013 07:34, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>> Hello list!
>>
>> There is a known long-lived issue with interface routes
>> addition/deletion:
>>
>> ifconfig iface inet 1.2.3.4/24 can fail if given prefix i
On 07.03.2013 15:55, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 07.03.2013 12:43, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>> On 07.03.2013 11:39, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>>> On 07.03.2013 07:34, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>>>> Hello list!
>>>>
>>>> There is a know
It seems I have no choice :)
WBR, Alexander
On 07.03.2013, at 18:03, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 07.03.2013 14:54, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>> On 07.03.2013 15:55, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>>> On 07.03.2013 12:43, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>>>> On 07.
On 07.03.2013 17:51, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 07.03.2013 14:38, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Andre Oppermann > <mailto:an...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
>>
>> On 07.03.2013 12:43, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>>
>>
On 08.03.2013 00:53, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 07.03.2013 16:34, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 07.03.2013 17:51, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 07.03.2013 14:38, Ermal Luçi wrote:
Isn't it better to teach the routing code about metrics.
Routing daemons cope better this way and they can h
On 08.03.2013 01:42, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote this message on Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 08:39 +0100:
Adding interface address is handled via atomically deleting old prefix and
adding interface one.
This brings up a long standing sore point of our routing code
which this patch m
On 09.03.2013 23:17, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Mar 7, 2013, at 9:42 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote this message on Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 08:39 +0100:
Adding interface address is handled via atomically deleting old prefix and
adding interface one.
This brings up a long standi
On 17.03.2013 13:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
any one? :)
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Sami Halabi wrote:
Hi,
Are there ongoing job of mpls in freebsd?
I saw thd site http://freebsd.mpls.in for aboug a year now and I don't
see much progress.
Yep. It was frozen for a while.
Currently I'm worki
On 17.03.2013, at 23:54, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 17.03.2013 19:57, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>> On 17.03.2013 13:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
>>>> ITOH OpenBSD has a complete implementation of MPLS out of the box, maybe
>> Their control plane code is mostly use
On 20.03.2013 04:54, Vladislav Prodan wrote:
Prompt please what or how to implement NAT64 on Freebsd?
Currently you can try to use net/tayga, it can serve for some purposes.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 18.03.2013 17:41, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 18.03.2013 13:20, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 17.03.2013, at 23:54, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 17.03.2013 19:57, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 17.03.2013 13:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
ITOH OpenBSD has a complete implementation of MPLS out of
On 26.03.2013 14:14, Stas Timokhin wrote:
> Hello !
Hello.
>
>
>
> Patch for injecting information network->as_number from extrernal
> sources (RIPE database, for example) into kernel and filling src and dst
> AS-number in Netflow v5 datagrams.
>
>
>
> http://www.stasyan.com/devel/ng_netfl
Hello list.
We currently have VLAHWFILTER functionality allowing underlying
physical/virtual interfaces to be aware of vlans stacked on them.
However, this knowledge is only used to program NIC hw filter (or to
broadcast to member ifaces in lagg case).
Proposed idea is to save vlan ifp pointer i
Hello list!
While experimenting with Chelsio T440-CR (cxgbe) internal firewall, I'm
getting some kind of unexpected results:
filtering 'type ipv4 action drop' permits IPv4 TCP traffic with bad
checksum.
filtering 'type IPv6 action drop' permits IPv6 traffic to multicast
addresses (MLDv2, etc
On 30.06.2013 23:41, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On 06/30/13 07:25, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
Hello list!
While experimenting with Chelsio T440-CR (cxgbe) internal firewall, I'm
getting some kind of unexpected results:
One bit of general advice to begin with: add "hitcnts 1" to
Hello list!
It seems there are still some rough edges with netmap api.
I'm currently experimenting with netmap receiver on fresh -current
(r252470) and ixgbe.
Every time the receiver is killed/coredumped/or ^C'd (stock pkt-gen with
-f rx can act as such receiver), after some random pause (10-3
On 25.07.2013 00:26, Boris Kochergin wrote:
Hi.
Hello.
I am looking for recommendations for a 10gbps NIC from someone who has
successfully used it on FreeBSD. It will be used on FreeBSD 9.1-R/amd64
to capture packets. Some desired features are:
- PCIe
- LC connectors
- 10GBASE-SR
- Either sin
Hello list!
Currently our pxeloader prefer to get NFS server information by its own
instead of using cached one.
This is how it is done:
pxe_open() indirectly opens socket (PXENV_UDP_OPEN, with cached IP from
BOOTPLAYER).
After that, bootp() resolve is done, resulting in (probably) more
"val
On 26.07.2013 19:30, Barney Cordoba wrote:
*From:* Alexander V. Chernikov
*To:* Boris Kochergin
*Cc:* freebsd-net@freebsd.org
*Sent:* Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:10 PM
*Subject:* Re: Recommendations for 10gbps NIC
On
On 27.07.2013 02:14, Barney Cordoba wrote:
*From:* Daniel Feenberg
*To:* Alexander V. Chernikov
*Cc:* Barney Cordoba ;
"freebsd-net@freebsd.org"
*Sent:* Friday, July 26, 2013 4:59 PM
*Subject:* Re: Recommend
On 27.07.2013 12:15, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov
wrote:
On 27.07.2013 02:14, Barney Cordoba wrote:
*From:* Daniel Feenberg
*To:* Alexander V. Chernikov
*Cc:* Barney
On 29.07.2013 13:14, vishal kumar wrote:
Hi Alex,
We found a similar crash on our system, not sure of the cause yet;
but did you find any solution for this?
Well, currently I'm using the following workaround:
http://static.ipfw.ru/patches/netmap_intel.diff
Thanks
--
View this message in co
On 14.08.2013 16:05, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:47:13PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Luigi.
You wrote 14 ?? 2013 ??., 14:21:09:
LR> Then the problem remains that we should keep a copy of route and
LR> arp information in the socket instead of redoing the lo
On 14.08.2013 16:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:15:25PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 14.08.2013 16:05, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:47:13PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Luigi.
You wrote 14 ?? 2013 ??., 14:21:09:
LR> Then
On 14.08.2013 18:00, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 05:01:05PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 14.08.2013 16:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
You can save rte&arp, however doing this
gives you perfect chance to crash your kernel if egress interface is
destroyed (like vlan o
On 14.08.2013 19:40, Marko Zec wrote:
On Wednesday 14 August 2013 14:40:24 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:15:25PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 14.08.2013 16:05, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:47:13PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Luigi.
You
On 14.08.2013 19:48, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 05:40:28PM +0200, Marko Zec wrote:
On Wednesday 14 August 2013 14:40:24 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:15:25PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
...
FWIW, apparently we already have that infrastrucure in place
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24.08.2013 00:54, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to commit this to -10. It migrates the if_lagg locking
> from a rw lock to a rm lock. We see a bit of contention between the
> transmit and
We're running lagg with rmlock on several hundred h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22.08.2013 00:51, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 19.08.2013 13:42, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>> On 14.08.2013 19:48, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 05:40:28PM +0200, Marko Zec wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday
Hello list!
There is a lot constantly raising discussions related to networking
stack performance/changes.
I'll try to summarize current problems and possible solutions from my
point of view.
(Generally this is one problem: stack is slooow,
but we need to know why an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.08.2013 21:18, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> Hi Net,
>
> I'm an infrequent traveler through the networking code and would
> appreciate some feedback on some proposed solutions to issues
> Spectra has seen with outbound LACP traffic.
>
> lacp_select
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.09.2013 00:45, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>
> Not sure about igb, but ixgbe (according to advanced RX descriptor
> format, 7.1.6.2 @ 82599 datasheet) can provide 'real' RSS value
> which can be used in m_flowid instead of NIC queue id.
>
> (And, b
On 14.09.2013 12:44, Anuranjan Shukla wrote:
> Hi,
> At Juniper Networks, interface name size was needed to be longer than what
> FreeBSD has. We're trying to reduce our local changes to FreeBSD to allow us
> an easier time upgrading to newer FreeBSD releases, and support the
> modularization of
On 29.08.2013 02:24, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 28.08.2013 20:30, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
Hello list!
Hello Alexander,
Hello Andre!
I'm very sorry to answer so late.
you sent quite a few things in the same email. I'll try to respond
as much as I can right now. Later you sh
On 29.08.2013 05:32, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:24:48AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
..
while Intel DPDK claims 80MPPS (and 6windgate talks about 160 or so) on the
same-class hardware and
_userland_ forwarding.
Those numbers sound a bit far out. Maybe if the packet
On 29.08.2013 15:49, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
Hello Adrian!
I'm very sorry for the looong reply.
There's a lot of good stuff to review here, thanks!
Yes, the ixgbe RX lock needs to die in a fire. It's kinda pointless to
keep locking things like that on a per-packet basis. We should be able
On 14.09.2013 22:49, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
IXIA ? For the timescales we need to address we don't need an IXIA,
a netmap sender is more than enough
The great netmap generates only one IP flow (same src/dst IP and same
src/dst port).
Th
On 07.10.2013 18:59, Konstantin Kuzvesov wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with NIC performance. Is this the right place to ask for
help?
Probably, if you are able to provide some more detailed information :)
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
On 24.04.2014 01:56, Chris Smith wrote:
> On 23/04/14 19:55, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> On 4/23/14, 4:38 AM, Nikolay Denev wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
>>> wrote:
Hello,
here, http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=248895
interfa
The following reply was made to PR kern/174958; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Alexander V. Chernikov"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, sklo...@cs.berkeley.edu
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/174958: [net] [patch] rnh_walktree_from makes unreasonable
assumptions
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 19:1
Hello guys.
(bootstrapping people involved in previous version of this topic, sorry
for that)
There were several problem descriptions/discussions on using 9k+ mbufs
with current allocator in:
if_em: kern/183381
cxgbe:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2014-February/037834.html
On 13.05.2014 13:46, Dennis Yusupoff wrote:
May be this will help? See answer on
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/189471
I'll try to fix it within a few days.
The problem itself happens due to the fact that every CIDR table address
is packed into IPv6 address and IPv4 ones are en
roy means:
* flush
* table tries (or other structures) freed
* type set to cidr
13.05.2014 14:32, Alexander V. Chernikov пишет:
On 13.05.2014 13:46, Dennis Yusupoff wrote:
May be this will help? See answer on
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/189471
I'll try to fix it within a
On 17.05.2014 19:14, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov
mailto:melif...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
On 13.05.2014 16:05, Dennis Yusupoff wrote:
I think that universal table for all kind of data (ipv4, ipv6,
ports,
etc
On 17.05.2014 23:57, Barney Wolff wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 05:44:37PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 13.05.2014 16:05, Dennis Yusupoff wrote:
I think that universal table for all kind of data (ipv4, ipv6, ports,
etc) is a bad idea by design. At least unless you haven'
Hello list!
This patch adds ability to name tables / reference them by name.
Additionally, it simplifies adding new table types.
Change list:
Kernel:
1) Add new IP_FW_TABLE_XGETCFG / IP_FW_TABLE_XSETCFG opcodes to permit
table reconfiguration
2) Tables data is now opaque to main ipfw code: use
On 19.05.2014 11:51, Bill Yuan wrote:
Hi Alex,
Hello Bill!
You guys are chatting here! I agree with you, the table is the place should
be enhanced, and I am working in this way as described below
1. Support more types.
ip : cidr
ipv4 : same as ip
ipv6 : ip addr v6
mac : mac address
if
On 19.05.2014 12:54, Dennis Yusupoff wrote:
Alex, Bill, it's a good news, glad to hear it.
Let me ask even more functionality:
6. Test if entry exist in table:
ipfw table test
It extremely useful in case of big, unordered data in the table - for
example different networks with different mask.
On 19.05.2014 17:12, bycn82 wrote:
On 5/19/14 21:00, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 19.05.2014 11:51, Bill Yuan wrote:
Hi Alex,
Hello Bill!
You guys are chatting here! I agree with you, the table is the place
should
be enhanced, and I am working in this way as described below
1
On 19.05.2014 17:38, Dennis Yusupoff wrote:
It's not enough, actually.
Imagine what you have a table with different networks. If you'll try to
find out is an IP belongs to some of that networks from the table, you
should to write relatively serious "wrapper" with network range
calculations in it.
On 22.05.2014 00:48, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:10:26PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 21.05.2014 15:10, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:51:08PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
Hello list!
This patch adds ability to name tables / reference them
On 22.05.2014 18:56, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
It looks like we have reached some kind of consensus on table naming,
so I'm going to implement the following as the first part:
* named-only tables, no "user-visible" indexes
* Keep the same opcodes, use additional TLVs to pass
On 22.05.2014 19:47, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 06:56:41PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 22.05.2014 00:48, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:10:26PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
...
we can solve this by using 'low' numbers for the nume
On 29.05.2014 16:33, Nadav Har'El wrote:
Hi,
Hello!
I'm working on the OSv project (http://osv.io/), a new BSD-licensed
operating system for virtual machines. OSv's networking code is based
on that of FreeBSD.
I recently noticed an inefficiency that I believe exists also in
FreeBSD's networkin
re you
going to translate the name to id before calling kernel-space methods?
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:10:26PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 21.05.2014 15:10, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:51:08PM +0400, Alex
On 06.06.2014 17:31, Ian Smith wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 00:10:26 +0800, bycn82 wrote:
Guys, I do understand that this is an important discussion about useful
ipfw feature,
but can you please stop invading this (totally unrelated) topic and
return to original one?
Thank you.
Hi Bill,
> S
On 10.06.2014 07:03, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
Hi,
- Original Message -
So, after finding out that nc has a stupidly small buffer size (2k
even though there is space for 16k), I was still not getting as good
as performance using nc between machines, so I decided to generate some
flame gra
On 10.06.2014 20:24, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Alexander V. Chernikov wrote this message on Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 13:17 +0400:
On 10.06.2014 07:03, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
Hi,
- Original Message -
So, after finding out that nc has a stupidly small buffer size (2k
even though there is
On 10.06.2014 22:11, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
- Original Message -
On 10.06.2014 07:03, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
Hi,
- Original Message -
So, after finding out that nc has a stupidly small buffer size (2k
even though there is space for 16k), I was still not getting as good
as p
On 10.06.2014 22:56, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Alexander V. Chernikov wrote this message on Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 21:33 +0400:
>> On 10.06.2014 20:24, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>>> Alexander V. Chernikov wrote this message on Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 13:17
>>> +0400:
>
On 14.06.2014 21:35, Michael Sierchio wrote:
Luigi -
Does table entry matching use a longest prefix match?
I'm not Luigi, but the answer is "yes" anyway :)
- M
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
On 15.06.2014 16:01, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 18:08:59 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 6/15/14, 3:00 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> > On 14.06.2014 21:35, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> > > Luigi -
> > >
> > > Does table entry
On 15.06.2014 16:36, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 16:04:45 +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> On 15.06.2014 16:01, Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 18:08:59 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > On 6/15/14, 3:00 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov wro
On 23.06.2014 19:32, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, June 20, 2014 11:25:51 am Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've stumbled across the following panic when testing Xen netback with
>> if_bridge:
>>
>> Kernel page fault with the following non-sleepable locks held:
>> exclusive sleep mutex
On 23.06.2014 20:39, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> On 23.06.2014 19:32, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Friday, June 20, 2014 11:25:51 am Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've stumbled across the following panic when testing Xen netback with
>>
On 15.07.2014 14:36, chk wrote:
Hi, everyone,
Help
I have a tincd vpn running in freebsd box FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p2 #0 r265318M.
below is ifconfig outut:
[chk@NUC ~]$ ifconfig
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=4219b
ether ec:a8:6b:f3:76:6a
inet 192.168.2
On 15.07.2014 21:40, chenkun wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov
wrote:
On 15.07.2014 14:36, chk wrote:
Hi, everyone,
Help
I have a tincd vpn running in freebsd box FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p2 #0 r265318M.
below is ifconfig outut:
[chk@NUC ~]$ ifconfig
em0: flags
On 15.07.2014 21:03, hiren panchasara wrote:
+ Alexander
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Kajetan Staszkiewicz
wrote:
The time has come to upgrade my routers to FreeBSD 9.3.
While going through list of patches I had on 9.1, I've noticed that r248070 got
into 9.3 but r250764 did not. Why is th
On 16.07.2014 21:48, Daniel Corbe wrote:
I hope this it the right place to ask questions about netmap. I'm
toying with the idea of writing a netmap-based OSPF implementation
because bird's OSPF implementation isn't as good as its BGP
Hm. What do you need from bird OSPF implementation?
IMHO it i
On 21.07.2014 18:18, Daniel Corbe wrote:
> "Alexander V. Chernikov" writes:
>
>> On 16.07.2014 21:48, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>> Hm. What do you need from bird OSPF implementation?
>> IMHO it is much easier to improve and merge bird code instead of
>> writing
Pawel Tyll wrote:
> Hi lists,
>
> Are there any plans to implement IPv6 tables in ipfw? It would seem
> that our gov. may want to force us into IPv6 in 6 months ;)
I've got working implementation for IPv4+IPv6 and interface tables:
15:56 [0] zfsbase# /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw table 2 list
1
Hello everyone.
Final patch version now uses single IP_FW3 socket option.
Together with other changes this makes me think such changes should be
reviewed by a wider number of people. If there are no
objections/comments I plan to commit this on tuesday.
Changes:
* Tables (actually, radix trees) ar
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 25. Dec 2011, at 17:47 , Pawel Tyll wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>>> Changes:
>>> * Tables (actually, radix trees) are now created/freed on demand.
>> Does this mean IPFW_TABLES_MAX can now be safely set to arbitrarily
>> high number that would allow flexible numberin
On 27.12.2011 04:54, Pawel Tyll wrote:
Hi lists,
Are there any profiling tools in the system or ports that would allow
me to determine how much processing is being done per packet and how
long does it take? I would like to predict possible PPS load for my
system and perhaps locate and remo
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 12/27/2011 6:36 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>>> Is IPFW efficient enough to firewall 2x10GE (in+out) interfaces
>>> without much latency increase, when running on modern hardware
>>> with Intel NICs? Majority of processing
On 01.02.2012 20:45, Andrey Zonov wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to tune machine with 8.2-STABLE for heavy network load and
now playing with netisr. Could anyone explain me why actually works only
one netisr thread if I set them to 8?
Can you please supply `nestat -Q` output and clarify you usage patte
On 02.02.2012 12:59, Коньков Евгений wrote:
Здравствуйте, Andrey.
Вы писали 2 февраля 2012 г., 8:35:23:
AZ> On 02.02.2012 5:11, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 01.02.2012 20:45, Andrey Zonov wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to tune machine with 8.2-STABLE for heavy network load and
now play
On 02.02.2012 21:07, Ryan Stone wrote:
2012/2/2 Alexander V. Chernikov:
P.S. it is also reasonable to set net.isr.bindthreads to 1
I really don't recommend setting this in any release. There is
currently a bug with binding kernel threads that causes unrelated
threads to be unnecess
On 04.02.2012 18:35, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone review/test the attached patch to add "-fib number" option
to route(8)? This should simplify static route configuration across
multiple FIBs in rc.conf. Just adding an -fib option like the
following will do the trick without cha
On 04.02.2012 21:05, Hiroki Sato wrote:
"Alexander V. Chernikov" wrote
in<4f2dc674.4070...@freebsd.org>:
me> On 04.02.2012 18:35, Hiroki Sato wrote:
me> > Hello,
me> >
me> >Can anyone review/test the attached patch to add "-fib number&q
t;From 2ca09cf74ef63fbde0ccede4a7e883c6f0add51d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Alexander V. Chernikov"
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:58:13 +0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Optimize BPF writers
---
share/man/man4/bpf.4 | 31 +---
sys/net/bpf.c| 97 ++
sys/net/bpf
On 20.04.2012 01:12, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 19.04.2012 22:34, K. Macy wrote:
This is indeed a big problem. I'm working (rough edges remain) on
changing the routing table locking to an rmlock (read-mostly) which
This only helps if your flows aren't hitting the same rtentry.
Otherwise you s
On 17.04.2012 01:29, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 15 April 2012 23:33, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 16.04.2012 01:17, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
This has broken (at least) net80211 and bpf, with LOR:
Yes, it is. Please try the attached patch
Hi,
Hello!
Sorry for the late reply, answering
On 28.04.2012 00:42, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi Alex,
Hello!
I don't want to be demanding, but would you please consider committing
your fixes?
I've asked glebius@ for the review for a while ago, but it seems it is a
bit staled..
And if you could, would you please do it as a set of commits, o
On 06.05.2012 12:11, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hello,
is there any on-job work on MPLS support in FreeBSD?
Do you know this site ? It points to some svn repository with mpls patches.
http://freebsd.mpls.in/
Major number of depends are already merged to the tree.
I'm currently working to update c
On 04.06.2012 02:22, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 03/06/2012 23:56 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I wonder if anybody else is seeing this and if there is a fix...
This is very recent (today's) FreeBSD head with pretty dull network
configuration. During boot I run into the following panic:
<118>Se
On 04.06.2012 18:31, Michael Pounov wrote:
Kernel crash when you wish to change interface name from vlan0 to other name
It seems to be in arrival/departure events.
Yes, this is already fixed in r236559.
--
WBR, Alexander
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Hello list!
Since the early days ifconfig(8) has the following functionality:
..
address
For the DARPA-Internet family, the address is either a
host name
present in the host name data base, hosts(5), or a DARPA
Internet
address expressed in the Inte
On 08.06.2012 11:20, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
On Thursday 07 June 2012 17:00:04 Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
Hello list!
Since the early days ifconfig(8) has the following functionality:
[hostname in place of literal address]
Moreover, ifconfig em0 some_valid_fqdn/MASK silently ignores it
On 09.06.2012 00:04, Kolasinski, Brent D. wrote:
Hi All,
I have been doing some tests with the FreeBSD ng_netflow module for
netflow generation. I am trying to export v9 netflow records to another
server running SiLK (which can receive v9 Netlfow from our Cisco routers
just fine).
When exporti
On 09.06.2012 01:56, Sami Halabi wrote:
Hi,
I Manage a FreeBSD server as an edge router& firewall.
the setup has 10G interfaces (ixgbe-82599EB) and 1G interfaces(em-82571EB&
bce-BCM5709) connected to 10G/1G switches.
With the following setup i get higher cpu usage:
bce1-upstream provider with
arg from any to table(1) in recv bce1
It is often a good idea to split in/out rules initially (e.g. skipto
1 ip from any to any out)
You can send me your ipfw config and we can discuss it more detailed.
any other advices?
Sami
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov
mail
1 - 100 of 284 matches
Mail list logo
