On 15.06.2014 16:01, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 18:08:59 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 6/15/14, 3:00 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> > On 14.06.2014 21:35, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> > > Luigi -
> > >
> > > Does table entry matching use a longest prefix match?
> > I'm not Luigi, but the answer is "yes" anyway :)
>
> this may be about to change, because tables are getting a rewrite,
> but IP-based tables use the same code that the routing tables use.
It'd be a bit anti-POLA for the longest prefix match behaviour to
change, though, especially with some tablearg usage. Alexander?
Well, "cidr" table are LPM by their nature.
Additional algorithms for matching may be introduced (dxr, hashed tables
for host-only prefixes)
but it won't influence user-visible behavior for given type.
cheers, Ian
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
