> Note that iMimic claims to run on a standard FreeBSD platform, which
> would also imply they use kqueue; this alone can probably provide the
> 2x performance boost you see on polygraph.
Yes, we do. In fact, the difference between FreeBSD and Linux is
greater
than 2x. On equivalent processors,
David Xu wrote:
>
> Linux 2.2 is known slow at TCP/IP throughput,
> but did you test Linux 2.4? it is very different.
> while Linux and FreeBSD are being improved, some guys here
> are still comparing FreeBSD with Linux 2.2, it's unfair, useless
> and waste time. please stop doing such a stupid
Jonathan Graehl wrote:
>
> What would it take to get Linus to give the nod to an implementation conforming
> to the kqueue API? I remember him saying that he only wanted it to work for
> file descriptors, and to only allow one kqueue per process - neither of which I
> agree with. The abstractio
