Re: FBSD 1GBit router?

Wouldn't it be a case for use of multicast vs unicast? Hardware is always better anyway, so why not invest in some switch that can do unicast/multicast in hardware? -- "Don't expect me to cry for all the | Łukasz Bromirski reasons you had to die&

Re: FBSD 1GBit router?

Willem Jan Withagen wrote: Łukasz Bromirski wrote: Willem Jan Withagen wrote: I'm looking for a stream exploder.:) 1 2Mbit stream in, and as many as possible out. And 7*1Gb = 14Gbit, so I'd like to be pushing 7000 streams. (One advantage is that they will be UDP streams, so there i

Re: fooling nmap

d the "I want Your disk-space" kid will try his SSH exploits with automated script whatever the fingerprint will be? [1]. http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/1593270461/ -- this space was intentionally left blank| Łukasz Bromirski you

OpenBGPd?

Hi, Is anyone working on a port of OpenBGPd, or current version of Quagga (0.97.3)? -- this space was intentionally left blank| Łukasz Bromirski you can insert your favourite quote here | lukasz:bromirski,net

Re: OpenBGPd?

ally left blank| Łukasz Bromirski you can insert your favourite quote here | lukasz:bromirski,net ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: ipfilter 4.1.6 won't build on FreeBSD5.3 amd64 (fwd)

Goran Gajic wrote: Actually I was interested if Dual Opteron with FBSD5.3 can compare with Cisco7206 with NPE-G1 running only for NAT You'll need good motherboard, NICs, 1-2GB of RAM and quite capable CPU. Two won't help much, but sometimes the motherboards for two CPUs provide higher standard (sep

Re: ipfilter 4.1.6 won't build on FreeBSD5.3 amd64 (fwd)

Hi Goran, On my NPE-G1 running just IOS 12.3(12a) cpu utilization was something like 70-90% but with IOS 12.3(11)T3 it is 20% since this one has NAT inside CEF Yes, exactly. However if you compare prices of PC hardware and Cisco hardware > decent PC hardware with FBSD seems like more acceptable s

Re: ipfilter 4.1.6 won't build on FreeBSD5.3 amd64 (fwd)

Tony Sarendal wrote: None of our 7200's will come anyway near those numbers. Are you sure it's cisco you are using =) ;) I can't argue for any 7200 in any situation, but again let me repeat, that the numbers I gave are for pure, fast-switched/CEFed routing. I think this discussion should migrate to

Re: OpenBGPD with FreeBSD

left blank| Łukasz Bromirski you can insert your favourite quote here |lukasz:bromirski,net ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reverse Path Filtering check in ip_input.c

one wiser than me to review the code and 'update' ip_input.c code? -- this space was intentionally left blank|Łukasz Bromirski you can insert your favourite quote here |lukasz:bromirski,net ___ freebsd-net@freebs

Re: Reverse Path Filtering check in ip_input.c

Łukasz Bromirski wrote: Patch applies cleanly on ip_input.c version 1.301.2.3 dated 2005/10/09 (latest RELENG_5 checkout). It will also work with latest RELENG_4 checkout (ip_input.c version 1.130.2.55 dated 2005/01/02). Sorry for small mistake - patch applies cleanly to: ip_input.c

Re: Reverse Path Filtering check in ip_input.c

ng rework of network code I'm sure we'll have it sooner or later and then maybe someone will revise old checks already marked as 'XXX' in the code ;) -- this space was intentionally left blank|Łukasz Bromirski you can insert your fav

Re: Reverse Path Filtering check in ip_input.c

e's always someone who has to do first step... ;) -- this space was intentionally left blank |Łukasz Bromirski you can insert your favourite quote here |lukasz:bromirski,net ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lis

Re: Multiple routes to the same destination

DDoS threats - Linux already did that in 2.6.x, as there an option to compile kernel with either FIB_HASH or FIB_TRIE. -- "Confidence is what you have before you| Łukasz Bromirski understand the problem." -- Woody Allen |lukasz:bromirski,net _