Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
I'm looking for a stream exploder.:)
1 2Mbit stream in, and as many as possible out.
And 7*1Gb = 14Gbit, so I'd like to be pushing 7000 streams.
(One advantage is that they will be UDP streams, so there is
a little less bookkeeping in the protocol stack )
Wouldn't it be a case for use of multicast vs unicast? Hardware
is always better anyway, so why not invest in some switch that
can do unicast/multicast in hardware?
Usefull suggestion, only this is going to be in an overlay cloud where
we do not have control over all the endpoint networks. let alone that we
can get them to use multicast. And even those that use multicast in their
last-mule equipment, don't always have correct setups.
My experience is that Multicast in nice in theory and experiment, but when
push comes to shove it does not completely deliver.
I don't know exact requirements and application used, but given IP TV
deployments relying heavily on multicast, and all other "VoD"
technologies also using multicast...I find Your comments disturbing :)
However, if you don't control the network over which it will be
transported, you need to replicate each stream...and so either
you'll find bandwidth to do it (or pay for it) or be forced to switch
to other design.
--
"Don't expect me to cry for all the | Łukasz Bromirski
reasons you had to die" -- Kurt Cobain | http://lukasz.bromirski.net
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
