https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203630
--- Comment #23 from Eddy ---
@Dexuan Cui, I'm not sure the patch is merged. The two revisions you mentioned
are made the 28th and 30th of July 2015, whereas the working patch was provided
by Wei the 4th of November.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203630
--- Comment #24 from Dexuan Cui ---
(In reply to Eddy from comment #23)
Hi Eddy, hmm, I am sorry -- I was looking at the wrong patch...
I'll ask the committers to help to merge the correct patch to stable/10.
--
You are receiving this ma
Hi,
I am trying to use the netmap on vmware in CentOS guests, I am able to use
netmap with the e1000 driver on vmware (though the throughput is close to
line speed).
But is there any way to use the netmap with vmxnet3? Is there any patch
available to support that? Or any suggestion on how can I ac
On 18/12/2015 11:51 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Garrett Wollman
wrote:
Or is VIMAGE cheap
enough that I won't notice the performance hit?
Vimage is a negligable overhead in a 1 jail (base jail) system and can
actually end up with a negative overhead (gain) in s
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203630
--- Comment #25 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: royger
Date: Fri Dec 18 14:56:49 UTC 2015
New revision: 292439
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/292439
Log:
MFC r291156:
Ignore the i
It would be nice to use VIMAGE, but is not in a GENERIC kernel.
Using a custom kernel voids a comfort of using freebsd-update
for installing patch revisions and upgrades.
Mark
On 2015-12-18 14:45, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 18/12/2015 11:51 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203630
--- Comment #26 from Dexuan Cui ---
Hi Eddy, roger has merged the fix to stable/10.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailin
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203630
--- Comment #27 from Eddy ---
(In reply to Dexuan Cui from comment #26)
Thank you Dexuan and royger!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Pradosh Datta wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to use the netmap on vmware in CentOS guests, I am able to use
> netmap with the e1000 driver on vmware (though the throughput is close to
> line speed).
>
> But is there any way to use the netmap with vmxnet3? Is there any
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:47:39PM +0100, bcs wrote:
> I have 3 FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE machines and all of them suffers of the
> following problem. They are not responding to ARP requests which causes
> network problem for me, other hosts can't access my FBSD machines on the
> LAN nor my FBSD host
Thanks for the hint, currently I don't want to replace the NIC with
other one, maybe a new server sometime.
Regards,
Csaba
2015. 12. 18. 19:10 keltezéssel, Aleksandr A Babaylov írta:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:47:39PM +0100, bcs wrote:
I have 3 FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE machines and all of them su
hrs added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
sys/net/if_lagg.c:753 Please separate a llq loop from a handler for per-port
configuration. A llq traversal should be required only once in lagg_port_ops()
if the handlers process a single lagg_llq entry.
sys/net/if_lagg.c:837 Is this (llq == NULL),
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128030
Nick B changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicbl...@clkroot.net
--- Comment #16 from
13 matches
Mail list logo
