Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
Hi,
I'm a student working in GSoC project. My task on this summer is to
write some new features for capsicum framework. Currently I working on
writing two new rights (CAP_SEND_RIGHTS and CAP_RECV_RIGHTS). I have
some questions about error checking in the soreceive_generic and the
soreceive_dgram.
Hi,
Quick update: works now.
Will let you know if it continues like this or if we hit another problem.
Huge thanks for the patch.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 04:20:30PM +0200, claudiu vasadi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The patch applied without
On Sun, 7/14/13, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router problems
To: "Barney Cordoba"
Cc: "isp" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Sunday, July 14, 2013, 1:17 PM
On 14.07.2013 23:14, Barney Cordoba
wrote:
> So why not get a real 10g
On Sun, 7/14/13, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router problems
To: "Barney Cordoba"
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "isp"
Date: Sunday, July 14, 2013, 1:17 PM
On 14.07.2013 23:14, Barney Cordoba
wrote:
> So why not get a real 10g
Thanks for reply.
This approach produces lot of "resource temporary unavailable" (eagain)
on accept-ing connections in N-1 processes.
Is this possible to avoid this by e.g. tweaking kqueue?
On Sun Jul 14 19:37:59 2013, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:16 PM, trafdev wrote:
i've noticed this when doing this stuff in a threaded program with
each thread listening on the same port.
All threads wake up on each accepted connection, one thread wins and
the other threads get EAGAIN.
-adrian
On 15 July 2013 12:31, trafdev wrote:
> Thanks for reply.
>
> This approach pro
Yep I think it's wasting of resources, poll manager should somehow be
configured to update only one process/thread.
Anyone know how to do that?
Thanks.
On Mon Jul 15 12:53:55 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
i've noticed this when doing this stuff in a threaded program with
each thread listening on th
On 15 July 2013 13:04, trafdev wrote:
> Yep I think it's wasting of resources, poll manager should somehow be
> configured to update only one process/thread.
> Anyone know how to do that?
> Thanks.
Well, the problem here is deciding which thread to throw the request at.
If the threads are equall
On 15.07.2013 22:04, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> Also, IP fragmentation and TCP segments are not the same thing. TCP
> segments regularly will come in out of order, NFS is too stupid to do
> things correctly; IP fragmentation should not be done unless necessary
> to accommodate a smaller mtu.
The PR
10 matches
Mail list logo
