Thanks for reply.

This approach produces lot of "resource temporary unavailable" (eagain) on accept-ing connections in N-1 processes.
Is this possible to avoid this by e.g. tweaking kqueue?

On Sun Jul 14 19:37:59 2013, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:16 PM, trafdev <traf...@mail.ru> wrote:
Hello.

Could someone help with following problem of SO_REUSEPORT.

The most portable "load balance" between processes listening on the
same TCP addr/port probably is:

s=socket();
bind(s);
listen(s);
/* various socketopt and fcntl as you needed */
pid=fork();
if (pid==0) {
     server_loop(s);
     exit(1);
}
server_loop(s);
exit(1);

Even in Linux or DragonFly SO_REUSEPORT "load balance" between
processes listening on the same TCP addr/port was introduced recently,
so you probably won't want to rely on it.

Best Regards,
sephe

_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to