Hello, Gleb.
You wrote 27 апреля 2013 г., 9:53:49:
GS> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 06:22:18PM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labb? wrote:
GS> But I'd like someone with decent hardware and traffic to test that first. I
GS> don't want to do this convertsion blindly w/o benchmark and stability test.
GS> Unfortun
On Apr 27, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Unfortunately, as you see, most people avoid running head, waiting at least
> for 10.0-RELEASE, or even for pfSense catching up on FreeBSD 10. So probably
> this change won't be tested soon, and thus won't happen soon,
Gleb,
As a minor p
Jim,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 07:58:04AM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote:
J> > Unfortunately, as you see, most people avoid running head, waiting at
least for 10.0-RELEASE, or even for pfSense catching up on FreeBSD 10. So
probably this change won't be tested soon, and thus won't happen soon,
J> As a
Hi Jason!
Am 27.04.2013 03:39, schrieb Jason Fesler:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Rainer Bredehorn wrote:
>> I've modified the kernel PF implementation to pass IPv6 fragments.
>> The first fragment is handled by the PF rules of course ignoring possible
>> checksums.
>
> Are you checking L
