Jim, On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 07:58:04AM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote: J> > Unfortunately, as you see, most people avoid running head, waiting at least for 10.0-RELEASE, or even for pfSense catching up on FreeBSD 10. So probably this change won't be tested soon, and thus won't happen soon, J> As a minor part of the pfSense team, I believe you are mistaken. J> J> I'm out of the office right now, but when I return, I'd already planned to duplicate the test in a test harness with several multi-core boxes acting as source & sink, and the DUT to include several popular platforms for pfSense running a set of software including running same across -HEAD, 9-STABLE, and 8.3, both with the pfSense patches (as pfSense), and without. J> J> I doubt I'll get this done prior to BSDcan, but I'll get it done, if only for internal reasons.
Good news! Thanks, Jim! -- Totus tuus, Glebius. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
