Re: bpf hold buffer in-use flag

2013-01-13 Thread Guy Helmer
On Jan 11, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Christian Peron wrote: > Guy, > > Can you please describe the race and how to reproduce it? When we introduced > zerocopy-bpf, we also introduced bpf_bufheld() and bpf_bufreclaimed() which > are effectively nops for the regular buffer mode. Maybe we could maintain

Re: To SMP or not to SMP

2013-01-13 Thread Bryan Venteicher
- Original Message - > From: "John Baldwin" > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "Peter Jeremy" > > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 9:39:17 AM > Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP > > On Thursday, January 10, 2013 02:36:59 PM Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On 2013-Jan-07 18:2

Re: if_vr(4) and DFE520-TX

2013-01-13 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > Ok, I got some details. It's an DFE-520TX (/C1 or rev. C1). I crafted an > patch attached, but whenever kldloading the modified if_vr, I got this: > > kernel: vr0: port 0xd100-0xd1ff > mem 0xf7c11000-0xf7c110ff irq 19 at de

VMware vmxnet2 driver

2013-01-13 Thread Bryan Venteicher
Hi, During the previous months, I've been porting OpenBSD's vmxnet driver (if_vic) to FreeBSD [1]. It has reach a doneness that I'd like to draw attention to it for those not subscribed to svn-projects. Most of the original OpenBSD driver - the attach, init, and Tx/Rx paths - have been rewritten.