Re: [PATCH] multiple instances of ipfw(4)

2012-01-31 Thread Ermal Luçi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Vadim Goncharov wrote: > Hi Ermal Lu?i! > > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:01:13 +0100; Ermal Lu?i wrote about '[PATCH] multiple > instances of ipfw(4)': > >> from needs on pfSense a patch for allowing multiple intances of >> ipfw(4) in kernel to co-exist was developed.

Re: [PATCH] multiple instances of ipfw(4)

2012-01-31 Thread Julian Elischer
On 1/31/12 12:53 AM, Ermal Luçi wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Vadim Goncharov wrote: Hi Ermal Lu?i! On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:01:13 +0100; Ermal Lu?i wrote about '[PATCH] multiple instances of ipfw(4)': from needs on pfSense a patch for allowing multiple intances of ipfw(4) in kern

ports/net/e169-stats (was: UMTS Huawei monitor)

2012-01-31 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, January 30, 2012 a las 12:09:20PM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió: > > Hello, > > I'm used to connect my FreeBSD laptop or netbooks to Internet using > Huawei USB modems (E220 or E1750) with good results, if the networks > coverage of the provider is good enough in the place in que

Re: ports/net/e169-stats (was: UMTS Huawei monitor)

2012-01-31 Thread Milan Obuch
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:44:14 +0100 Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Monday, January 30, 2012 a las 12:09:20PM +0100, Matthias > Apitz escribió: > > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm used to connect my FreeBSD laptop or netbooks to Internet using > > Huawei USB modems (E220 or E1750) with good results, if

Re: ports/net/e169-stats (was: UMTS Huawei monitor)

2012-01-31 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, January 31, 2012 a las 11:01:00AM +0100, Milan Obuch escribió: > > I was thinking about a Huawei USB modem monitor and got a pointer to > > the ports/net/e169-stats (thanks to Milan for this); I have checked > > it out and it does mostly what I was thinking of; I have a few > > que

Re: [PATCH] multiple instances of ipfw(4)

2012-01-31 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:01:13PM +0100, Ermal Lu?i wrote: > Hello, > > from needs on pfSense a patch for allowing multiple intances of > ipfw(4) in kernel to co-exist was developed. > It can be found here > https://raw.github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense-tools/master/patches/RELENG_9_0/CP_multi_inst

Re: ports/net/e169-stats (was: UMTS Huawei monitor)

2012-01-31 Thread Milan Obuch
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:19:31 +0100 Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Tuesday, January 31, 2012 a las 11:01:00AM +0100, Milan Obuch > escribió: > > > > I was thinking about a Huawei USB modem monitor and got a pointer > > > to the ports/net/e169-stats (thanks to Milan for this); I have > > > checked

Re: ports/net/e169-stats (was: UMTS Huawei monitor)

2012-01-31 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, January 31, 2012 a las 11:53:48AM +0100, Milan Obuch escribió: > Hi, > > I will test it later to see, but AFAIR this should be > running/moving/live graph presentation of signal strength and data > transfer (load/speed) done in ASCII, so a bit rough. Not as nice as > done in 'prop

Re: msk0: watchdog timeout interface hang

2012-01-31 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Kim Culhan wrote: >> Running 10-curent from 01-20-12 >> the msk0 interface hung, on the console: >> >> msk0: watchdog timeout >> msk0: prefetch unit stuck? >> msk0: initialization failed: no me

Difference in address selection between ICMP and TCP

2012-01-31 Thread Guido van Rooij
Consider the following: ifconfig em0 inet 1.2.3.4/24 ping 1.2.3.4 Then a tcpdump on lo0 shows: 21:15:56.641571 IP 127.0.0.1 > 1.2.3.4: ICMP echo request, id 36105, seq 10, length 64 21:15:56.641582 IP 1.2.3.4 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 36105, seq 10, length 64 I think that the address u

Re: Difference in address selection between ICMP and TCP

2012-01-31 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 31.01.2012 21:27, Guido van Rooij wrote: Consider the following: ifconfig em0 inet 1.2.3.4/24 ping 1.2.3.4 Then a tcpdump on lo0 shows: 21:15:56.641571 IP 127.0.0.1> 1.2.3.4: ICMP echo request, id 36105, seq 10, length 64 21:15:56.641582 IP 1.2.3.4> 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 36105, s

allowing gif thru ipfw

2012-01-31 Thread Eric W. Bates
Seems like a silly question; but how does one allow the packets composing a gif tunnel thru ipfw? I assumed a gif was made up of ipencap (IP proto 4) packets and added rules: $fwcmd add 00140 allow ipencap from $he_tun to me $fwcmd add 00141 allow ipencap from me to $he_tun ($he_tun is an Hurr

Re: pf not seeing inbound packets on netgraph interface

2012-01-31 Thread Edward Carrel
On Jan 24, 2012, at 2:57 AM, Andreas Longwitz wrote: > Hi Ed, > >> I am running into a roadblock getting PF to filter traffic on >> a Netgraph interface representing an L2TP/IPSec connection. > >> The problem I have is that PF only sees traffic on the outbound >> side of the netgraph interface.

Re: allowing gif thru ipfw

2012-01-31 Thread Eugene Grosbein
01.02.2012 11:36, Eric W. Bates пишет: > Seems like a silly question; but how does one allow the packets > composing a gif tunnel thru ipfw? > > I assumed a gif was made up of ipencap (IP proto 4) packets and added rules: > > $fwcmd add 00140 allow ipencap from $he_tun to me > $fwcmd add 00141 a