On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:47:02AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 11/10/10 12:04, Eugene Perevyazko wrote:
>
> >CPU is e5...@2.4ghz, 8 cores, irqs bound to different cores skipping HT
> >ones.
>
> Unless you need the CPU cores for other tasks on the server, they won't
> help you with network thr
Hi,
I have a curious problem I'm hoping someone can help with or at least
educate me on.
I have several large Linux clusters and for each one we hide the compute
nodes behind a head node using NAT. Historically, this has worked very well
for us and any time a NAT gateway (the head node) reboots
Hi,
I have a curious problem I'm hoping someone can help with or at least
educate me on.
I have several large Linux clusters and for each one we hide the compute
nodes behind a head node using NAT. Historically, this has worked very well
for us and any time a NAT gateway (the head node) reboots
On 11/10/2010 04:15, Randy Bush wrote:
> bjoern zeeb just received the itojun award. congratulations, bjoern.
> and than you for all the hard work on the ipv6 stack.
>
> randy
For this not understanding what this is or what its about:
http://www.isoc.org/awards/itojun/
Where you will find Bjoe
> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:49:56 -0800 (PST)
> From: Kirill Yelizarov
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 11/11/10, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> > From: Kevin Oberman
> > Subject: Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
> > To: "Wilkinson, Alex"
> > Cc: freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
> > Date:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:49:52PM +0200, Eugene Perevyazko wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:47:02AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > On 11/10/10 12:04, Eugene Perevyazko wrote:
> >
> > >Tried 2 queues and 1 queue per iface, neither hitting cpu limit.
> >
> > Are you sure you are not hitting the C
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:08:25AM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:34:21PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >>On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:01:36PM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
> >>>On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:05:40PM +0200, Eugene Perevyazko wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:49:52PM +0200, Eugene Perevyazko wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:47:02AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > > On 11/10/10 12:04, Eugene Perevyazko wrote:
> > >
> > > >Tried 2 queues and 1 queue per ifac
The driver already handles the pinning, you shouldnt need to mess with it.
MSIX interrupts start at 256, the igb driver uses one vector per queue,
which
is an TX/RX pair. The driver creates as many queues as cores up to a max
of 8.
Jack
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Eugene Perevyazko wrote
Hello,
i am new in this Maillist and i use an ML370G4 with FreeBSD 8.1 AMD64. I
try with netio and TCP. The used Nics are onboard Broadcom
(PCI-X133Mhz), an Broadcom PCI-X Nic and an intel PCI-X Nic. The CPU
load is around 35% and the performance like this:
Packet size 1k bytes: 99303 KBy
On 11/11/10 6:36 AM, Christopher Penney wrote:
Hi,
I have a curious problem I'm hoping someone can help with or at least
educate me on.
I have several large Linux clusters and for each one we hide the compute
nodes behind a head node using NAT. Historically, this has worked very well
for us an
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
>> VS>I, probably, was to verbose, and didn't make myself clear enough. For now,
>> VS>from network admin point of view, it's 3 problems:
>> VS>1) No ARP support
>
> The ARP table should be there. It may be that it got 'lost' with the ARP
> ch
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:10:57AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:49:56 -0800 (PST)
> > From: Kirill Yelizarov
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Thu, 11/11/10, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> > > From: Kevin Oberman
> > > Subject: Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472 [SEC=UNCLA
Hi,
I have an Asus M2NPV-VM motherboard with integrated Nvidia MCP51 Gigabit
Ethernet NIC and
TP-Link TG-3468 PCIe network card which is using Realtek 8111 chip.
I have problem with the re driver: the Nvidia network interface is working
properly but the other
though it seems recognized by OS I ca
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:56:26PM +0100, Gabor Radnai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an Asus M2NPV-VM motherboard with integrated Nvidia MCP51 Gigabit
> Ethernet NIC and
> TP-Link TG-3468 PCIe network card which is using Realtek 8111 chip.
>
> I have problem with the re driver: the Nvidia network inter
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 07:35:32PM +, r...@reckschwardt.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i am new in this Maillist and i use an ML370G4 with FreeBSD 8.1 AMD64. I
> try with netio and TCP. The used Nics are onboard Broadcom
> (PCI-X133Mhz), an Broadcom PCI-X Nic and an intel PCI-X Nic. The CPU
> load
> From: Pyun YongHyeon
> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:04:36 -0800
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:10:57AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > > Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:49:56 -0800 (PST)
> > > From: Kirill Yelizarov
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Thu, 11/11/10, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > >
> > > > F
Hello YongHyeon,
yes, booth Test-Servers are in idle State, no Disk activity and no
important Networktraffic.
the pciconf -lcbv for the Nics:
e...@pci0:7:1:0: class=0x02 card=0x00db0e11 chip=0x10108086 rev=0x01
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'Dual Port G
here is the pciconf for the onboard Nic
b...@pci0:7:3:0:class=0x02 card=0x00cb0e11 chip=0x16c714e4
rev=0x10 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
device = 'BCM5703A3 NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet'
class = network
subclass = ethernet
bar [10] = t
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:44:31PM +, r...@reckschwardt.de wrote:
> Hello YongHyeon,
>
> yes, booth Test-Servers are in idle State, no Disk activity and no
> important Networktraffic.
>
> the pciconf -lcbv for the Nics:
>
> e...@pci0:7:1:0: class=0x02 card=0x00db0e11 chip=0x10108086 re
Howdy,
After some excellent comments from Bjoern I've put together the following patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~gnn/head-arpqueue4.diff
Please review and comment.
Best,
George
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
On 11/12/10 07:39, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/11/10 6:36 AM, Christopher Penney wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a curious problem I'm hoping someone can help with or at least
>> educate me on.
>>
>> I have several large Linux clusters and for each one we hide the compute
>> nodes behind a head node
On 12.11.2010 03:29, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/12/10 07:39, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/11/10 6:36 AM, Christopher Penney wrote:
Hi,
I have a curious problem I'm hoping someone can help with or at least
educate me on.
I have several large Linux clusters and for each one we hide the compu
Hi,
Gabor Radnai (gabor.rad...@gmail.com) [10.11.11 23:22] wrote:
> pciconf:
> n...@pci0:0:20:0:class=0x068000 card=0x816a1043 chip=0x026910de rev=0xa3
> hdr=0x00
> vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation'
> device = 'MCP51 Network Bus Enumerator'
> class = bridge
> r...@pci0:1:0
24 matches
Mail list logo
