On 2010-10-1, at 1:55, Doug Barton wrote:
> My point about FreeBSD 9 is that if we add the 6rd code today, then
> release 9.0 in about a year, then support the RELENG_9 branch for 4-6
> years that we will still be maintaining code that no one has any use
> for. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
You're s
Doug Barton wrote
in <4ca51544.9080...@freebsd.org>:
do> In any case I didn't say that 6rd was not useful at all. What I tried
do> to make the case for is that its utility is limited, both in the
do> absolute sense and in the temporal sense; and that because of these
do> limitations the benefit
Dan Langille wrote
in <4ca55041.7040...@langille.org>:
da> # cat /etc/rtadvd.conf
da> fxp1:\
da> :addrs#1:addr="2001:470:1f07:b80::":prefixlen#64:tc=ether:
In this case, you do not need rtadvd.conf. The command line "rtadvd
fxp1" should work fine.
da> Where: fxp1 is on my internal LAN
Hi,
In the following is an observation when testing our XLR/XLS network
driver with 16 concurrent instances of netperf on FreeBSD-CURRENT.
Based on this observation, I have a question on which I hope to get
some understanding from here.
When running 16 concurrent netperf instances (each for about
On Fri, October 1, 2010 5:38 am, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote
> in <4ca55041.7040...@langille.org>:
>
> da> # cat /etc/rtadvd.conf
> da> fxp1:\
> da> :addrs#1:addr="2001:470:1f07:b80::":prefixlen#64:tc=ether:
>
> In this case, you do not need rtadvd.conf. The command line "rtad
On 01.10.2010 12:01, Sriram Gorti wrote:
Hi,
In the following is an observation when testing our XLR/XLS network
driver with 16 concurrent instances of netperf on FreeBSD-CURRENT.
Based on this observation, I have a question on which I hope to get
some understanding from here.
When running 16 c
"Dan Langille" wrote
in <0a85d5595ffdc548668406d3e87621c2.squir...@nyi.unixathome.org>:
da> > Can you show the results of "ifconfig fxp1"?
da>
da> # ifconfig fxp1
da> fxp1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
da> options=9
da> ether 00:04:ac:d3:70:12
da> inet 10.55.0.1 netmask
On Fri, October 1, 2010 8:31 am, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> "Dan Langille" wrote
> in <0a85d5595ffdc548668406d3e87621c2.squir...@nyi.unixathome.org>:
>
> da> > Can you show the results of "ifconfig fxp1"?
> da>
> da> # ifconfig fxp1
> da> fxp1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
> 1500
> da> options=9
I'm going to combine all of my responses into one message since it will
be my last on the topic. It's pretty clear to me at this point that the
code is going in, so I will make one last attempt to clarify my points
in the hope that they are beneficial to anyone who is actually
interested in lea
The following reply was made to PR kern/146792; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Nicola Tiling
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
n...@gtelecom.ru
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/146792: [flowtable] flowcleaner 100% cpu's core load
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 23:19:17 +0200
--Apple-Mail-3-570601307
Content-Tra
10 matches
Mail list logo
