Re: Call for testers: RFC 5569 (6rd) support in stf(4)

2010-09-24 Thread Ondoy
Hello Hiroki, Thanks for your reply. I think I now see how you this is supposed to work. What I didn't (crucially) get first was that the BR IPv4 address is configured at the CE when adding the IPv6 default route. It is simpler to get when 6rdPrefixLen is 32 and IPv4MaskLen is 0. Now I'm trying t

Re: Default gateway on different net

2010-09-24 Thread Lasse Brandt
Hi, Thanks for the replies :) On 23/09/2010, at 18.15, bz=li...@zabbadoz.net wrote: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Hiroki Sato wrote: >> la> 1) Is the hosting provider actually forcing me to do something "bad" >> la> og plain wrong? >> >> In that situation normally you get an IP address in the /59 netwo

Re: Default gateway on different net

2010-09-24 Thread Lars Eggert
On 2010-9-24, at 12:06, Lasse Brandt wrote: > IPs: 2a01:::3183:: /64 > Gateway: 2a01:::3180::1 /59 > > And this is my rc.conf: > > ipv6_enable=”YES” > ipv6_static_routes=”defgw” > ipv6_route_defgw=”2a01:::3180:: -prefixlen 59 -iface re0” > ipv6_defaultrouter=”2a01::xxx

Re: Call for testers: RFC 5569 (6rd) support in stf(4)

2010-09-24 Thread Hiroki Sato
Ondoy wrote in : lo> Hello Hiroki, lo> lo> Thanks for your reply. lo> I think I now see how you this is supposed to work. lo> What I didn't (crucially) get first was that the BR IPv4 address is configured lo> at the CE when adding the IPv6 default route. lo> lo> It is simpler to get when 6rdPr

Re: bge watchdog timeout errors FreeBSD 7.3

2010-09-24 Thread a . smith
Quoting Pyun YongHyeon : Please apply patch at the following URL and let me know how it goes. http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/stable/7/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c?r1=207862&r2=208995&view=patch http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c?r1=212302&r2=212755&view=patch Thanks for

Re: Call for testers: RFC 5569 (6rd) support in stf(4)

2010-09-24 Thread Ondoy
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote: > >  Ahh, no, the embedded IPv4 address only supports exactly 32-bit >  length currently.  I am working on the shorter case >  (i.e. 6rdBRIPv4Address cannot be extracted from 6rdPrefix in a simple >  way), so please wait for the next patch ;) >

Re: bge watchdog timeout errors FreeBSD 7.3

2010-09-24 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:39:38PM +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote: > Quoting Pyun YongHyeon : > > >Please apply patch at the following URL and let me know how it goes. > > > >http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/stable/7/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c?r1=207862&r2=208995&view=patch > >http://svn.freebsd.org/

Re: bce(4) - com_no_buffers (Again)

2010-09-24 Thread Tom Judge
On 09/23/2010 02:33 PM, Tom Judge wrote: > The throttle command I am using in the tests is the one from here: > > http://klicman.org/throttle/ > > > On 09/23/2010 02:26 PM, Tom Judge wrote: > >> On 09/23/2010 01:21 PM, David Christensen wrote: >> >> >> Under testing I have yet to see

Re: Server network interface problem?

2010-09-24 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2010-Sep-22 14:32:52 -0400, Carlos Kamtha wrote: >To solve this problem, i plugged out the network cable and plugged it back in. >... >a.) Could this be an issue with the driver on this release for em0? Possibly - there have been some issues with em(4) and some chipsets. Alternatively, it co