Re: kern/144564: lltable grows too much

2010-03-31 Thread Evgenii Davidov
Здравствуйте, On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:34:42PM -0500, Kevin Day пишет: > This patch also corrected a long-standing bug we were running into on our > public 6to4 relay that would cause llentry to grow over time until we hit the > limit. I've been testing it for 5 days now with moderate load (>

Re: Workaround for mpd5 and 8.0 broken proxy arp?

2010-03-31 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:25:48PM -0700, Li, Qing wrote: > > Yes, it's still broken (it's a regression compared to 7.x). A > > workaround I've found working after analyzing the newer kernel > > code is to ALWAYS use the same IP address for the local end of > > the tunnel as of the corresponding A

RE: Workaround for mpd5 and 8.0 broken proxy arp?

2010-03-31 Thread J. English
Li, I am using VLANs, but not on my FreeBSD box. Mpd log does not show any "cannot intuit interface index" errors. Would be happy to apply the patches. I followed the links Mike provided, but I'm unsure of what to do at that point (I did read README and UPDATING, but I guess I'm still too new t

net80211 ratectl proof of concept

2010-03-31 Thread Rui Paulo
Hi, I've started developing a ratectl framework for net80211, loosely based on what DragonFly has. Right now only one driver has been ported, but I would like your feedback before continuing. The objective is to, eventually, have all the ratectl stuff (amrr, sample, onoe(?) and rssadapt) in net

Re: net80211 ratectl proof of concept

2010-03-31 Thread Rui Paulo
On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Rui Paulo wrote: >> Hi, >> I've started developing a ratectl framework for net80211, loosely based on >> what DragonFly has. Right now only one driver has been ported, but I would >> like your feedback before con

Re: net80211 ratectl proof of concept

2010-03-31 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote: > On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote: > > This looks great! > > Is there specific reasons to use pointers and not ints for some > > arguments of foo_tx_complete() and foo_tx_update()? > > Not really. I'll probably switch them t

Re: net80211 ratectl proof of concept

2010-03-31 Thread Rui Paulo
On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:04, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote: >>> This looks great! >>> Is there specific reasons to use pointers and not ints for some >>> arguments of foo_tx_complete() and foo_tx_

Re: net80211 ratectl proof of concept

2010-03-31 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:05:27PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote: > On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:04, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote: > >> On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote: > >>> This looks great! > >>> Is there specific reasons to use pointe

Re: net80211 ratectl proof of concept

2010-03-31 Thread Rui Paulo
On 31 Mar 2010, at 18:06, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:05:27PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:04, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote: On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote: > This lo

Re: kern/143788: [iwi] wpa_supplicant(8) can't set privacy on iwi interface

2010-03-31 Thread bschmidt
Synopsis: [iwi] wpa_supplicant(8) can't set privacy on iwi interface State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bschmidt State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 31 17:27:12 UTC 2010 State-Changed-Why: According to the submitter this issue has been fixed. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr