8.0 RC1 "ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion failed"

2009-09-29 Thread Vlad Galu
Hi, I keep getting these messages whenever I restart OpenVPN. My configuration indeed has some static routes that's supposed to clean upon shutdown, but neither of them have a loopback address as a next hop. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http:/

Re: conf/132179: [patch] /etc/network.subr: ipv6 rtsol on incorrect wlan interface

2009-09-29 Thread David Horn
The following reply was made to PR conf/132179; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Horn To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: conf/132179: [patch] /etc/network.subr: ipv6 rtsol on incorrect wlan interface Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:14:35 -0400 Please close this bug (conf/

RE: 8.0 RC1 "ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion failed"

2009-09-29 Thread Li, Qing
> > Hi, I keep getting these messages whenever I restart OpenVPN. My > configuration indeed has some static routes that's supposed to clean > upon shutdown, but neither of them have a loopback address as a next > hop. > This message is harmless, however, could you please email me Your "ifconfig -

Re: conf/132179: [patch] /etc/network.subr: ipv6 rtsol on incorrect wlan interface

2009-09-29 Thread dougb
Synopsis: [patch] /etc/network.subr: ipv6 rtsol on incorrect wlan interface State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: dougb State-Changed-When: Tue Sep 29 17:36:31 UTC 2009 State-Changed-Why: Originator reports that this problem was fixed by my change in r195029. Responsible-Change

Re: conf/132179: [patch] /etc/network.subr: ipv6 rtsol on incorrect wlan interface

2009-09-29 Thread Doug Barton
David Horn wrote: > Please close this bug (conf/132179) as fixed. SVN r195029 Cool, I fixed a PR without even knowing it. :) Thanks for letting us know it's fixed, and sorry I missed the PR first time around. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___

Re: WLAN performance Windows/XP ./. FreeBSD 8-CURRENT

2009-09-29 Thread Doug Barton
Matthias Apitz wrote: > Hello, > > I am wondering what could cause the following WLAN performance diff > between a XP and 8-CURRENT laptop, sitting side by side and connected to > the same AP: > > OS XP 8-CURRENT > NIC Intel 3945ABGAtheros 5424/2424 > Ping

ipfw gred parameters

2009-09-29 Thread Brett Glass
I've been trying to determine the best parameters for gred ("gentle RED") to allow graceful bandwidth limiting in ipfw, but have found precious little guidance on the Web as to what the parameters mean. The code gives some hints, but I'm still uncertain: what parameters work best in a typical s

RE: kern/139145: [ip6] IPv6 blackhole / reject routes broken

2009-09-29 Thread Li, Qing
I cannot reproduce this problem. I configured my system according to the bug description and I get the expected error message: --- # traceroute6 2a02:898:17:1234:: connect: Network is unreachable --- -- Qing > -

Re: WLAN performance Windows/XP ./. FreeBSD 8-CURRENT

2009-09-29 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, September 29, 2009 a las 11:07:53AM -0700, Doug Barton escribió: > Since you asked the question in the most generic way possible, here > are some generic answers: > > 1. Different hardware > a. Different wlan cards (as you pointed out) > b. Different laptops > c.

Re: ipfw gred parameters

2009-09-29 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:54:53PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > I've been trying to determine the best parameters for gred ("gentle > RED") to allow graceful bandwidth limiting in ipfw, but have found > precious little guidance on the Web as to what the parameters mean. > The code gives some hin