[Patch for review] Experimental NAT-T + PFKey cleanup

[same mail sent both on ipsec-tools-devel and freebsd-net, please use respective MLs for potential issues on each side] Hi all. Here is a beta patch which cleans the way PFKey exchanges NAT-T ports between kernel and userland, available at: http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/experimental/ pa

Re: VLAN interface management - unloading carrying driver hangs the machine

On 1/8/09, Jack Vogel wrote: > Fine with me, go do it and I'll take the driver code out :) > > Jack > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Yony Yossef > wrote: > >> > Jack Vogel wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Sam Leffler > > > > wrote: >> > > >

Re: [Patch for review] Experimental NAT-T + PFKey cleanup

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: Hi, [same mail sent both on ipsec-tools-devel and freebsd-net, please use respective MLs for potential issues on each side] Hi all. Here is a beta patch which cleans the way PFKey exchanges NAT-T ports between kernel and userland, available at: htt

Re: CARP IP level load balancing

--- On Tue, 1/20/09, Alexey Ivanov wrote: > From: Alexey Ivanov > Subject: CARP IP level load balancing > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 9:30 AM > In FreeBSD there is only ARP level LB, that is in some cases > just not enough for load balancing. > Is there any

Cannot resolve hostname; DNS problem when using DHCP

Hello, i have a strange DNS problem. If i use DHCP i'm not able to ping myself using the hostname (and hostname+domain). The strange thing is that i can't reproduce this on my 'real' system (with Fritzbox router) but in a VM (VMWare Player). Also some FreeNAS users have the same problem with 'r

Re: Cannot resolve hostname; DNS problem when using DHCP

Hello, I can't help notice that in /etc/resolv.conf you have: search localdomain Yet you make no mention or definition of/for localdomain in any other place. So, you'll either need to create a CNAME for localdomain in a DNS zone file - or better; search: localhost, or local in your resolv.conf fi

Re: CARP IP level load balancing

Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 9:30 AM In FreeBSD there is only ARP level LB, that is in some cases just not enough for load balancing. Is there any plans to port IP level LB from OpenBSD, and, if yes, will it be ported to 7x and 6x? In my opinion, full CARP realization is one step towards LVS-

Re: bsnmp module for monitoring network flows: bsnmp-pcap

On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Shteryana Shopova wrote: SS>> SS> SS>> SS>This is indeed interesting :) SS>> SS>One thing to point out is that { begemot 206 } is already allocated SS>> SS>for begemotVlan - and the two modules will conflict - you might want SS>> SS>to contact harti for a free OID under begemo

Re: Multiple Routing Tables (FIB) + IPFW problem as (I?) expected

obviously you did some other commands here.. something generated 2 million packets.. Julian, its a production enviroment, firewall was up for a few minutes. Thats the reason. I was thinking of adding a 'reroute' ipfw keyword.. kind of like 'fwd {original dest} ip from any to any' because 'fwd'

Re: kern/130820: [ndis] wpa_supplicant(8) returns 'no space on device'

Old Synopsis: wpa_supplicant returns 'no space on device' New Synopsis: [ndis] wpa_supplicant(8) returns 'no space on device' Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jan 21 18:29:51 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over

NFS-Locking problem with 6.4/7.1-RELEASE

Hi, one of our FreeBSD-Servers is acting as NFS-Server for $HOME for approx. 50 HP-UX Workstations, since the WS itself and the disks in there become quite old in the meantime. That works quite good with FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-pxx but doesn't work with 6.4/7.1 any more. I looked with 'wire

Re: CARP IP level load balancing

Luiz Otavio O Souza wrote: Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 9:30 AM In FreeBSD there is only ARP level LB, that is in some cases just not enough for load balancing. Is there any plans to port IP level LB from OpenBSD, and, if yes, will it be ported to 7x and 6x? In my opinion, full CARP realizat

Re: kern/130846: [vge] vge0 not autonegotiating to 1000baseTX full duplex in 7.1

Old Synopsis: vge0 not autonegotiating to 1000baseTX full duplex in 7.1 New Synopsis: [vge] vge0 not autonegotiating to 1000baseTX full duplex in 7.1 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 22 00:20:11 UTC 2009 Respon

Re: kern/130820: [ndis] wpa_supplicant(8) returns 'no space on device'

On 1/21/09, lini...@freebsd.org wrote: > Old Synopsis: wpa_supplicant returns 'no space on device' > New Synopsis: [ndis] wpa_supplicant(8) returns 'no space on device' > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net > Responsible-Changed-By: linimon > Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jan

Proxy arp on a router?

I have done extensive experimentation on my network and extensive Googling and and am confused as to whether you can use proxy arp in the following situation. I have a router at 192.168.0.200/16 that also has an interface to 192.168.1.1/24. I want to proxy arp the 192.168.1.1 so that requests th