Hi,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Stef wrote:
> Figured this may be interesting for folks...
>
> I've released a bsnmp module which can monitor arbitrary traffic flows
> and expose them as SNMP counters.
>
This is indeed interesting :)
One thing to point out is that { begemot 206 } is already
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Shteryana Shopova wrote:
SS>Hi,
SS>
SS>On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Stef wrote:
SS>> Figured this may be interesting for folks...
SS>>
SS>> I've released a bsnmp module which can monitor arbitrary traffic flows
SS>> and expose them as SNMP counters.
SS>>
SS>
SS>This is in
HI,
> SS>
> SS>This is indeed interesting :)
> SS>One thing to point out is that { begemot 206 } is already allocated
> SS>for begemotVlan - and the two modules will conflict - you might want
> SS>to contact harti for a free OID under begemot.
>
> Argh. Sorry. He contacted me and I messed probably
In FreeBSD there is only ARP level LB, that is in some cases just not enough
for load balancing.
Is there any plans to port IP level LB from OpenBSD, and, if yes, will it be
ported to 7x and 6x?
In my opinion, full CARP realization is one step towards LVS-equal
functionality.
__
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Luiz Otavio O Souza wrote:
>>> obviously you did some other commands here..
>>> something generated 2 million packets..
>>
>> Julian, its a production enviroment, firewall was up for a few
>> minutes. Thats the reason.
>>
>>> I was thinking of adding a 'reroute' ip
Hello! I want to ask you have equivalent commands in FreeBSD and if what they
are. Commands that are talking ip rou, ip roule.Also want to know if FreeBSD is
doing better than Linux Kernel
2.6.8 in
the role of Bridge, Router, VPN and quality of some PPOE hub.
Interested if FreeBSD is doing better
Harti Brandt wrote:
> I probably missed something here. Any other conflicts? Can we move bsnmp-pcap
> to 207? And does bsnmp-jails conflict with something?
Like Shteryana said, it seems like it does conflict...
Would it work to have and 1112? I used those while the software was
in developmen
Harti Brandt wrote:
> I probably missed something here. Any other conflicts? Can we move bsnmp-pcap
> to 207? And does bsnmp-jails conflict with something?
Like Shteryana said, it seems like it does conflict...
Would it work to have and 1112? I used those while the software was
in developmen
Greetings,
Back in the 3.x days of FreeBSD, if I installed it while my COM ports
were attached to my cablemodem, and switch port(s), a VC was automatically
attached to it. I'm not sure what has changed in that area in the more
recent versions of FBSD, but my previous experiences no longer prevail.
