dhclient doing DISCOVER with bad IP checksum - bge

2008-12-01 Thread Jonathan Feally
Sorry for the cross-post, but this could be either lists problem. I have 2 boxes running 7-STABLE as of 20081130, both i386 SMP. One is running ISC DHCPD 3.0.x from recent ports, and the other dhclient from make world. The server is refusing to answer the DISCOVER request, as it thinks the I

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

2008-12-01 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

FreeBSD 7.1 tcp problem (syncache)?

2008-12-01 Thread Paulo Fragoso
Hi, We was using one machine with FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE running apache-worker-2.2.3 + mysql, this server can answer high request from one client using ab: {client}$ ab -n 2000 -c 1000 http://system_using_6.4-RELEASE ... Benchmarking * (be patient) Completed 200 requests Completed 400 reque

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 tcp problem (syncache)?

2008-12-01 Thread Ivan Voras
Paulo Fragoso wrote: > > Using other hardware whit FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE running > apache-worker-2.2.9_5 + mysql, we have a poor result: > > > {client}$ ab -n 2000 -c 1000 http://system_using_7.1-PRERELEASE > ... > Test aborted after 10 failures > > apr_connect(): Invalid argument (22) > {cli

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 tcp problem (syncache)?

2008-12-01 Thread Andre Oppermann
Paulo Fragoso wrote: Hi, We was using one machine with FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE running apache-worker-2.2.3 + mysql, this server can answer high request from one client using ab: {client}$ ab -n 2000 -c 1000 http://system_using_6.4-RELEASE ... Benchmarking * (be patient) Completed 200 request

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 tcp problem (syncache)?

2008-12-01 Thread Paulo Fragoso
Em 01/12/2008 11:42, Andre Oppermann escreveu: Paulo Fragoso wrote: Hi, We was using one machine with FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE running apache-worker-2.2.3 + mysql, this server can answer high request from one client using ab: {client}$ ab -n 2000 -c 1000 http://system_using_6.4-RELEASE ... Bench

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 tcp problem (syncache)?

2008-12-01 Thread Paulo Fragoso
Our machine test have apache-2.0.61_2 running FreeBSD-6.3-RELEASE-p3, its ab program is used on all tests. Paulo. On 01/12/2008 12:18, Petri Helenius wrote: I couldn't get Apache 2.2 ab to work on 7.0 at all. The ab from 2.0 worked fine... Pete Andre Oppermann wrote: Paulo Fragoso wrote

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 tcp problem (syncache)?

2008-12-01 Thread Petri Helenius
I couldn't get Apache 2.2 ab to work on 7.0 at all. The ab from 2.0 worked fine... Pete Andre Oppermann wrote: Paulo Fragoso wrote: Hi, We was using one machine with FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE running apache-worker-2.2.3 + mysql, this server can answer high request from one client using ab:

Re: FreeBSD Window updates

2008-12-01 Thread Venkat Venkatsubra
Hi Andre, When delayed Ack is set the window update is not sent. Does this mean when odd number of packets are received and later read, a window update won't go out either till the next segment arrives or 200 msecs delayed ack timer ? Can this reduced window block the sender from sending the next

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 tcp problem (syncache)?

2008-12-01 Thread Tom Evans
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:53 -0300, Paulo Fragoso wrote: > Hi, > > We was using one machine with FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE running > apache-worker-2.2.3 + mysql, this server can answer high request from > one client using ab: > > > {client}$ ab -n 2000 -c 1000 http://system_using_6.4-RELEASE > ... >

Re: FreeBSD Window updates

2008-12-01 Thread David Malone
Hi Andre, > Slightly improved version attached. I like the idea of checking if the change is about 1 when scaled by the window scaling factor. It might even be better to check if the new window would look better when scaled down, because these aren't exactly the same. Especially when the window i

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 tcp problem (syncache)?

2008-12-01 Thread Paulo Fragoso
On 01/12/2008 12:41, Tom Evans wrote: On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:53 -0300, Paulo Fragoso wrote: Hi, We was using one machine with FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE running apache-worker-2.2.3 + mysql, this server can answer high request from one client using ab: {client}$ ab -n 2000 -c 1000 http://syst

Re: FreeBSD Window updates

2008-12-01 Thread Andre Oppermann
Venkat Venkatsubra wrote: Hi Andre, When delayed Ack is set the window update is not sent. Does this mean when odd number of packets are received and later read, a window update won't go out either till the next segment arrives or 200 msecs delayed ack timer ? Can this reduced window block the s

Re: Gathering Hardware State During a Driver Initiated Kernel Panic

2008-12-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 24 November 2008 04:56:22 pm Sam Leffler wrote: > David Christensen wrote: > > Is there a method or callback in FreeBSD where a driver can > > be notified that it has caused a kernel panic in order to > > generate a dump of internal hardware state information? I've > > written a sysctl

Re: FreeBSD Window updates

2008-12-01 Thread Venkat Venkatsubra
Hi Andre, >To answer your question: I do think we are fine with waiting for the >delayed ACK.  If an application starts to seriously lag behind like >in your example the feedback mechanism should work and cause the sender >to slow down too.  The feedback loop in TCP is not only the network but Th

Re: kern/129352: [xl] [patch] xl0 watchdog timeout

2008-12-01 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: xl0 watchdog timeout New Synopsis: [xl] [patch] xl0 watchdog timeout Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Dec 1 22:53:23 UTC 2008 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/c

Re: kern/122743: [panic] vm_page_unwire: invalid wire count: 0

2008-12-01 Thread Anton Yuzhaninov
The following reply was made to PR kern/122743; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Anton Yuzhaninov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: kern/122743: [panic] vm_page_unwire: invalid wire count: 0 Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:00:40 +0300 It looks like simila

Re: re0: Unknown H/W revision: 0x28000000 device_attach: re0 attach returned 6

2008-12-01 Thread Andrew
2008/12/1 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 03:18:41AM +, Andrew Tulloch wrote: > > I've just installed from the FreeBSD 7.1-BETA1 iso and get the > > following when the re driver attempts to attach to the two onboard > > NICs found on a Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 mothe

Re: re0: Unknown H/W revision: 0x28000000 device_attach: re0 attach returned 6

2008-12-01 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:50:07AM +, Andrew wrote: > 2008/12/1 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 03:18:41AM +, Andrew Tulloch wrote: > > > I've just installed from the FreeBSD 7.1-BETA1 iso and get the > > > following when the re driver attempts to attac

[ipsec]could you help me explain where problem is for aes-ctr of ESP

2008-12-01 Thread wang_jiabo
Hello, all: following is my setkey configration. I can get SAD and SPD. but when I run " ping6 -I rl0 3ffe:501::103:20a:ebff:fe85:9e56 " on FreeBSD FreeBSD report: kernel: esp_aesctr_decrypt aes-ctr:payload length must be multiple of 16 kernel: decrypt fail in IPv

[ipsec] why did not freebsd6.3 support icmp6 echo request on tunnel mode ? it is ok on transport mode.

2008-12-01 Thread wang_jiabo
Hello, all: the following configuration is my setkey info. when I run " setkey -f filename", system report "the result of line 4 :Invalid argument. the result of line 6 : Invalid argument." change "icmp6 128,0" to "icmp6 or any" , that is no problem . or change "tunnel" to "transport" , that is

[ipsec] aes-ctr question

2008-12-01 Thread wang_jiabo
Hello, all: following is my setkey configration. I can get SAD and SPD. but when I run " ping6 -I rl0 3ffe:501::103:20a:ebff:fe85:9e56 " on FreeBSD FreeBSD report: kernel: esp_aesctr_decrypt aes-ctr:payload length must be multiple of 16 kernel: decrypt fail in IPv6

Re: dhclient doing DISCOVER with bad IP checksum - bge (7.1 show stopper??)

2008-12-01 Thread Jonathan Feally
Can someone please confirm or rule out my issue with dhclient sending bad IP checksum packets. It would really suck if 7.1 was released with a broken DHCP client. Jonathan Feally wrote: Sorry for the cross-post, but this could be either lists problem. I have 2 boxes running 7-STABLE as of 200

Re: dhclient doing DISCOVER with bad IP checksum - bge (7.1 show stopper??)

2008-12-01 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 15:57:15 Jonathan Feally wrote: > Can someone please confirm or rule out my issue with dhclient sending > bad IP checksum packets. It would really suck if 7.1 was released with a > broken DHCP client. I had 7.1-PRE (early Octover) send out DHCP requests without issue, a