Eitan, good day.
Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:53:26PM +0200, Eitan Shefi wrote:
> I am using 2 hosts with FreeBSD-7.0 connected directly.
> When I change the MTU to a value greater then 1500, for example 3000,
> and then send "ping" with message size 2500, from one host to the other,
> the other host g
Hi,
i have two core system with freebsd 7.0. I have two NIC; first is em and
second is bge.
I wonder why system put irq processes almost always to one core.
There is example:
11 root1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN0 311.2H 96.19% idle: cpu0
10 root 1 171 ki31 0K 8K CPU
Bartosz Giza wrote:
> Another question is why em0 taskq is eating so much cpu ? BGE interface is
> actually one that pushes 2 times more packets than em0 and it uses about
> half cpu comparing to em0. Is that not strange ?
> Could someone tell my why is this happening ? BGE is faster ? or maybe
Bartosz Giza wrote:
Hi,
i have two core system with freebsd 7.0. I have two NIC; first is em and
second is bge.
I wonder why system put irq processes almost always to one core.
There is example:
11 root1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN0 311.2H 96.19% idle: cpu0
10 root 1 171
Ivan Voras wrote:
Bartosz Giza wrote:
Another question is why em0 taskq is eating so much cpu ? BGE interface is
actually one that pushes 2 times more packets than em0 and it uses about
half cpu comparing to em0. Is that not strange ?
Could someone tell my why is this happening ? BGE is faster
HI Byung,
Thank you so much share this great link. It would be great if the nsupdate can
be trigger from the web too.. however, the link did not provided the
instruction on how to do that...
Do you have any advise?
Thanks.
Roberto
From: Byung-Hee HWANG <
Hello, Freebsd-net.
Is here any real difference between two versions of this network
adapter? According to documents on Intel site, only difference I can
see is that server version goes with two brackets: standard and
low-profile one. Everything other is same: picture, controller,
specifications
Oleksandr Samoylyk wrote:
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>> Bartosz Giza wrote:
>>
>>> Another question is why em0 taskq is eating so much cpu ? BGE
>>> interface is actually one that pushes 2 times more packets than em0
>>> and it uses about half cpu comparing to em0. Is that not strange ?
>>> Could someone
Tuesday 28 of October 2008 11:49:21 Oleksandr Samoylyk napisał(a):
> Ivan Voras wrote:
> > Bartosz Giza wrote:
> >> Another question is why em0 taskq is eating so much cpu ? BGE
> >> interface is actually one that pushes 2 times more packets than em0
> >> and it uses about half cpu comparing to em0
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bartosz Giza wrote:
>
>> Another question is why em0 taskq is eating so much cpu ? BGE interface is
>> actually one that pushes 2 times more packets than em0 and it uses about
>> half cpu comparing to em0. Is that not strange
Bartosz Giza wrote:
> Tuesday 28 of October 2008 11:49:21 Oleksandr Samoylyk napisał(a):
>> Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> Bartosz Giza wrote:
Another question is why em0 taskq is eating so much cpu ? BGE
interface is actually one that pushes 2 times more packets than em0
and it uses about ha
Tuesday 28 of October 2008 11:43:40 Oleksandr Samoylyk napisał(a):
> Bartosz Giza wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i have two core system with freebsd 7.0. I have two NIC; first is em
> > and second is bge.
> > I wonder why system put irq processes almost always to one core.
> > There is example:
> >
> > 1
Tuesday 28 of October 2008 12:29:54 Ivan Voras napisał(a):
> Bartosz Giza wrote:
> > Tuesday 28 of October 2008 11:49:21 Oleksandr Samoylyk napisał(a):
> >> Ivan Voras wrote:
> >>> Bartosz Giza wrote:
> Another question is why em0 taskq is eating so much cpu ? BGE
> interface is actually
Hello,
As the subject says, I'm trying to enable jumbo frames on running
machine by setting
ifconfig em0 mtu 9000 by hand, but nothing changed, and I've fount
that when I list
the routing table with the MTU column it shows the connected routes
still with MTU 1500.
Is this supposed to work t
Roberto de Sousa wrote:
Hello Henri,
Thank you for your kindness to help me on this.. I have generated the
key and and edit my named.conf as per your instruction. I have also
tried your script which work great. What i would like to find out more
is that how to modify this script so that it pro
Hi Henri,
thanks for the help. I have this script :
#!/bin/sh
IPADDR=`ifconfig em0 | grep 'inet addr:[0-9]' | tr -s " " | cut -d" " -f3 | tr
-d "addr:"`
echo "update delete host1.customer. A" >> /etc/nsupdate
echo "update delete host2.customer. CNAME" >> /etc/nsupdate
echo "update add host5.custom
Bartosz Giza wrote:
> On other router based on the same hardware and software i have something
> like that:
>
>10 root 1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN1 235.4H 78.66% idle: cpu1
>11 root 1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN0 185.2H 72.12% idle: cpu0
>20 root 1 -68-
On Tuesday 28 of October 2008 15:12:09 Alexander Motin wrote:
> Bartosz Giza wrote:
> > On other router based on the same hardware and software i have something
> > like that:
> >
> >10 root 1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN1 235.4H 78.66% idle:
> > cpu1 11 root 1 171 ki31 0K
It can't change the route table when you've given it no address:
IE. ifconfig em0 HOSTNAME mtu 9000 will update it just fine.
Cheers,
Jack
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Nikolay Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As the subject says, I'm trying to enable jumbo frames on running m
I found the reason for bad performance. It also affected the non-free nvidia
glx driver. It was options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B
real-time extensions not set in the kernel configuration.
--Mikko Kortelainen
2008/10/25 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008
On 28 Oct, 2008, at 18:41 , Jack Vogel wrote:
It can't change the route table when you've given it no address:
IE. ifconfig em0 HOSTNAME mtu 9000 will update it just fine.
Cheers,
Jack
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Nikolay Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello,
As the subject says,
Bartosz Giza wrote:
The CPU time you see there includes much more then just a card handling
itself. It also includes CPU time of the most parts of network stack
used to process received packet. So if you have NAT, big firewall,
netgraph or any other CPU-hungry actions done with packets incoming v
Eitan Shefi wrote this message on Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 23:53 +0200:
> I am using 2 hosts with FreeBSD-7.0 connected directly.
> When I change the MTU to a value greater then 1500, for example 3000,
> and then send "ping" with message size 2500, from one host to the other,
> the other host gets more
Nikolay Denev wrote this message on Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 19:54 +0200:
> On 28 Oct, 2008, at 18:41 , Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> >It can't change the route table when you've given it no address:
> >
> >IE. ifconfig em0 HOSTNAME mtu 9000 will update it just fine.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Jack
> >
> >
> >On T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried the
exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it all
works perfectly, but as soon as I do this on another machine on a public IP,
I'm not getti
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried
> the
> exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it
> all
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, October 28, 2008 22:08:18 -0400 Michael Proto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> I'm trying to ru
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:35:35 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> netstat -nr on the 192 server shows the IP to be at:
>
> > netstat -nr | grep 168.1.100
> 192.168.1.100 52:54:00:12:34:56 UHLW11 fxp0 1128
>
> which is very odd, as that MAC address is n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I only have one VM running on one server ...
- --On Tuesday, October 28, 2008 21:14:28 -0700 Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:35:35 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> netstat -nr on the 192 server
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:38:38 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I only have one VM running on one server ...
Ok.
Here are some debugging suggestions.
- /etc/sysctl.conf should have the following;
net.link.tap.user_open=1
net.link.tap.up_on_open=1
run sysctl manu
Hi,
I would like to setup 10gbit bridge on FreeBSD7 , but I'm little bit
confused which vendor to choose for the NICs.
Can you send me some feed back?
regards,
Mihail Balikov
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
31 matches
Mail list logo
